IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mhe/chemon/2026-02.html

Aligning community and public priorities in informal settlement upgrading: Evidence from discrete choice experiments in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Rohan Sweeney

    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University)

  • Farzana Hossain

    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, The Superpower Institute, Melbourne)

  • Jumriani Ansar

    (Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar)

  • Indra Dwinata

    (Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar)

  • Sitti Andriani Anwar

    (Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar)

  • Arlyani Risal

    (Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar)

  • Gang Chen

    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne)

  • Michaela F. Prescott

    (Faculty of Art Design & Architecture, Monash University)

  • S Fiona Barker

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University)

  • Karin Leder

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University)

  • Ansariadi Ansariadi

    (Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar)

  • David W. Johnston

    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University)

Abstract

This study employs two discrete choice experiments (DCEs) conducted with two sample groups in Indonesia to investigate the informal settlement upgrading priorities of residents (sample 1) and explore how they align with public taxpayers’ preferences (sample 2). The first DCE explores the relative importance placed upon common planning and public health priorities, such as water security, drainage, and diarrhoea in children, alongside local economic development priorities. The second DCE investigates the relative importance placed upon project implementation design considerations, including project completion time and community consultation. Our findings reveal that residents particularly prioritise improvements in water quality and economic development. While informal settlement upgrading interventions often prioritise improving water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) to reduce diarrhoea and other water-borne disease, our study highlights that residents also highly value economic empowerment, underscoring the need for integrated upgrading approaches that address both health and livelihood concerns. Taxpayer perspectives were well-aligned on upgrading outcome priorities, but diverged slightly on project implementation. Whereas residents prioritized minimizing project duration and were less concerned with significant community consultation, taxpayers emphasized generating employment opportunities for residents within project designs. Both groups expressed an aversion to residents bearing full responsibility for resourcing ongoing operations and maintenance, preferring government or shared responsibility, highlighting the need for sustainable funding models. The study highlights the value of DCEs as a tool to support locally-led development, informing upgrading strategies that are more likely to be both politically feasible and successfully appropriated into urban livelihood practices of residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohan Sweeney & Farzana Hossain & Jumriani Ansar & Indra Dwinata & Sitti Andriani Anwar & Arlyani Risal & Gang Chen & Michaela F. Prescott & S Fiona Barker & Karin Leder & Ansariadi Ansariadi & David , 2026. "Aligning community and public priorities in informal settlement upgrading: Evidence from discrete choice experiments in Indonesia," Papers 2026-02, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2026-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://monash-ch-econ-wps.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/RePEc/mhe/chemon/2026-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2026-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Johannes Kunz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.