IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lue/wpaper/318.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Before-after differences in labor market outcomes for participants in medical rehabilitation in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Fischer

    (Leuphana University Lueneburg, Germany)

  • Inna Petrunyk

    (Leuphana University Lueneburg, Germany)

  • Christian Pfeifer

    (Leuphana University Lueneburg, Germany)

  • Anita Wiemer

    (Leuphana University Lueneburg, Germany)

Abstract

The authors address the issue of effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in terms of labor market outcomes by analyzing a large representative administrative panel data set for Germany. The research design focuses on socio-demographic group differences in before-after differences in days with unemployment benefits, days in employment, and labor income of participants in medical rehabilitation. The mean before-after differences indicate that medical rehabilitation is rather ineffective with respect to labor market outcomes, because the number of days with unemployment benefits is larger and the number of working days and labor income are smaller after the rehabilitation than before. The differences in the before-after differences are however large between socio-demographic groups. For example, older participants perform significantly worse and better educated participants have significant better labor market outcomes after the rehabilitation than before, whereas gender differences are small.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Fischer & Inna Petrunyk & Christian Pfeifer & Anita Wiemer, 2014. "Before-after differences in labor market outcomes for participants in medical rehabilitation in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 318, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:lue:wpaper:318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinrichtungen/ifvwl/WorkingPapers/lue/pdf/wp_318_Upload.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheadle, A. & Franklin, G. & Wolfhagen, C. & Savarino, J. & Liu, P.Y. & Salley, C. & Weaver, M., 1994. "Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: A population- based study of Washington State workers' compensation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(2), pages 190-196.
    2. MacKenzie, E.J. & Morris Jr., J.A. & Jurkovich, G.J. & Yasui, Y. & Cushing, B.M. & Burgess, A.R. & DeLateur, B.J. & McAndrew, M.P. & Swiontkowski, M.F., 1998. "Return to work following injury: The role of economic, social, and job- related factors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(11), pages 1630-1637.
    3. Arndt R. Reichert & Boris Augurzky & Harald Tauchmann, 2015. "Self‐Perceived Job Insecurity And The Demand For Medical Rehabilitation: Does Fear Of Unemployment Reduce Health Care Utilization?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 8-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inna Petrunyk & Christian Pfeifer, 2022. "Diverse effects of shorter potential unemployment benefit duration on labor market outcomes in Germany," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(3), pages 367-388, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan L. Maxwell & Nathan Wozny, "undated". "Risk Factors Associated with Disability Following Work-Related Injuries," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 3cd8cee9c4814af5a406f839c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:8158 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. McLaren, Christopher F. & Reville, Robert T. & Seabury, Seth A., 2017. "How effective are employer return to work programs?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 58-73.
    4. Yan-Hua Diao & Chun-Shuo Chen, 2020. "Research on the Relationship Between Job Competence and Job Well-Being in Service Industry—Based on the Mediating Effect of Job Insecurity," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Gürtzgen, Nicole & Hiesinger, Karolin, 2020. "Dismissal protection and long-term sickness absence: First evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Chadi, Adrian & de Pinto, Marco & Schultze, Gabriel, 2019. "Young, gifted and lazy? The role of ability and labor market prospects in student effort decisions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 66-79.
    7. Sjöberg, Ola, 2017. "Positive welfare state dynamics? Sickness benefits and sickness absence in Europe 1997–2011," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 158-168.
    8. Adrian Chadi & Laszlo Goerke, 2023. "Seeking shelter in times of crisis? unemployment, perceived job insecurity and trade union membership," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 1041-1088, July.
    9. Amanda E Young & YoonSun Choi & Elyssa Besen, 2015. "An Exploration of the Factors Considered When Forming Expectations for Returning to Work following Sickness Absence Due to a Musculoskeletal Condition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Andersen, Signe Hald, 2010. "The cost of sickness: On the effect of the duration of sick leave on post-sick leave earnings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1589, May.
    11. Sergio I. Prada & David Salkever & Ellen J. MacKenzie, 2012. "Level-I Trauma Center Effects on Return-to-Work Outcomes," Evaluation Review, , vol. 36(2), pages 133-164, April.
    12. Galizzi, Monica & Boden, Leslie I., 2003. "The return to work of injured workers: evidence from matched unemployment insurance and workers' compensation data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 311-337, June.
    13. Hogelund, Jan & Holm, Anders, 2006. "Case management interviews and the return to work of disabled employees," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 500-519, May.
    14. Inna Petrunyk & Christian Pfeifer, 2022. "Diverse effects of shorter potential unemployment benefit duration on labor market outcomes in Germany," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 36(3), pages 367-388, September.
    15. Nan Maxwell & Albert Liu & Nathan Wozny & Caroline Massad Francis, 2013. "Addressing Return-to-Work Issues in the Federal Employees' Compensation Act with Administrative Data," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 8e3f929cbea0422e8272f03ab, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Richard J. Butler & William G. Johnson, 2011. "Loss Reduction Through Worker Satisfaction: The Case of Workers’ Compensation," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, March.
    17. Nathan N O’Hara & Marckenley Isaac & Gerard P Slobogean & Niek S Klazinga, 2020. "The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Nicolas Ziebarth, 2014. "Assessing the effectiveness of health care cost containment measures: evidence from the market for rehabilitation care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 41-67, March.
    19. repec:mpr:mprres:7900 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Amélie Speiser, 2021. "Back to work: the effect of a long-term career interruption on subsequent wages in Switzerland," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 157(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Gürtzgen, Nicole & Hiesinger, Karolin, 2020. "Dismissal Protection and Long-term Sickness Absence - First Evidence from Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 202022, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    22. Deborah Graefe & Gordon Jong & Dee May, 2006. "Work disability and migration in the early years of welfare reform," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(4), pages 353-368, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    medical rehabilitation; effectiveness; labor market performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lue:wpaper:318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Wagner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://leuphana.de/institute/ivwl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.