IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jau/wpaper/2026-1.html

Do Labor Provisions in Trade Agreements Improve Labor Rights?

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Miravet

    (Deptartment of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain)

  • Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso

    (Department of Economics and Center for Statistics, Georg-August Universitaet Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany & IEI and Department of Economics, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain)

Abstract

This paper examines how labor provisions in trade agreements affect labor rights in developing countries. Using panel data for 105 developing countries from 1995 to 2021 and an instrumental variables strategy to address endogeneity, we estimate the effects on both de jure and de facto labor rights. We construct novel measures capturing not only the category but also the depth of labor provisions, drawing on the ILO’s Labor Provisions in Trade Agreements Hub, which covers 79 thematic areas. We find that binding provisions improve de jure labor rights but do not affect de facto outcomes, thereby widening the gap between law and practice. Non-binding provisions show no significant effects, highlighting both the importance and limitations of enforceability and depth in labor provisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Miravet & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2026. "Do Labor Provisions in Trade Agreements Improve Labor Rights?," Working Papers 2026/01, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    • Handle: RePEc:jau:wpaper:2026/1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.doctreballeco.uji.es/wpficheros/Miravet_and_Martinez_01_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haberli, Christian. & Jansen, Marion. & Monteiro, José-Antonio., 2012. "Regional trade agreements and domestic labour market regulation," ILO Working Papers 994700163402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. Baldwin, Richard & Jaimovich, Dany, 2012. "Are Free Trade Agreements contagious?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 1-16.
    3. Isao Kamata, 2015. "Labor Clauses in Regional Trade Agreements and Effects on Labor Conditions: An Empirical Analysis," Discussion papers e-14-019, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    4. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 2001. "Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty, and International Economic Institutions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 519-562.
    5. David KUCERA & Dora SARI, 2019. "New labour rights indicators: Method and trends for 2000–15," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(3), pages 419-446, September.
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:470016 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso & Hendrik W. Kruse, 2019. "Are Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements Improving Labour Conditions?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 975-1003, November.
    8. Sabina Dewan & Lucas Ronconi, 2018. "U.S. Free Trade Agreements and Enforcement of Labor Law in Latin America," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 35-56, January.
    9. Fatima Olanike Kareem, 2024. "How do labour provisions in trade agreements affect decent work?," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 1108-1133, August.
    10. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., 2005. "Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(3), pages 593-629, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Céline Carrère & Marcelo Olarreaga & Damian Raess, 2022. "Labor clauses in trade agreements: Hidden protectionism?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 453-483, July.
    2. Rémi Bazillier & Arslan Tariq Rana, 2025. "Social Clauses in Free Trade Agreements: An Efficient Tool to Improve Labour Standards?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(6), pages 1251-1281, June.
    3. Jonas AISSI & Rafael PEELS & Daniel SAMAAN, 2018. "Evaluating the effectiveness of labour provisions in trade agreements: An analytical and methodological framework," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(4), pages 671-698, December.
    4. Jacopo Timini & Nicola Cortinovis & Fernando López Vicente, 2020. "The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements with labor provisions (Updated March 2021)," Working Papers 2017, Banco de España, revised Mar 2021.
    5. Jacopo Timini & Nicola Cortinovis & Fernando López Vicente, 2022. "The heterogeneous effects of trade agreements with labour provisions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9), pages 2820-2853, September.
    6. Damian Raess & Andreas Dür & Dora Sari, 2018. "Protecting labor rights in preferential trade agreements: The role of trade unions, left governments, and skilled labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 143-162, June.
    7. Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso & Hendrik W. Kruse, 2019. "Are Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements Improving Labour Conditions?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 975-1003, November.
    8. Isao Kamata, 2015. "Labor Clauses in Regional Trade Agreements and Effects on Labor Conditions: An Empirical Analysis," Discussion papers e-14-019, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    9. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Layna Mosley & Robert Galantucci, 2019. "Protecting Workers Abroad and Industries at Home: Rights-based Conditionality in Trade Preference Programs," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1253-1282, May.
    10. Isao Kamatai, 2014. "Regional Trade Agreements with Labor Clauses: Effects on Labor Standards and Trade," Discussion papers e-13-007, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    11. Ruiqi Yang & Han Luo, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Navigating the Evolution of Labor Provisions: Comparative Insights from China, the US, and the EU in Free Trade Agreements," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11128-11160, September.
    12. Robertson,Raymond, 2021. "Deep Integration in Trade Agreements : Labor Clauses, Tariffs, and Trade Flows," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9599, The World Bank.
    13. Andreas Dür & Leonardo Baccini & Manfred Elsig, 2014. "The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 353-375, September.
    14. Isao KAMATA, 2014. "Regional Trade Agreements with Labor Clauses: Effects on labor standards and trade," Discussion papers 14012, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    15. Maggi, Giovanni, 2014. "International Trade Agreements," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 317-390, Elsevier.
    16. Antoni Estevadeordal & Gaston Nievas, 2024. "Trade and diplomacy Economic determinants of international cooperation agreements and its effect on international trade in the post World War II era: 1945-2022," PSE Working Papers halshs-04721902, HAL.
    17. Céline CARRERE & Marcelo OLARREAGA & Damian RAESS, 2017. "Labor Clauses in Trade Agreements: worker protection or protectionism?," Working Papers P200, FERDI.
    18. Aaditya Mattoo & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta & Aaditya Mattoo, 2020. "Handbook of Deep Trade Agreements," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34055, April.
    19. Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2016. "Political stability and trade agreements: Evidence for ‘endgame FTAs’," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 133-148.
    20. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/c8dmi8nm4pdjkuc9g8m2hh491 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Giovanni Maggi & Ralph Ossa, 2020. "Are Trade Agreements Good For You?," NBER Working Papers 27252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • J83 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Workers' Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jau:wpaper:2026/1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: María Aurora Garcia Gallego (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ueujies.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.