IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intlab/v157y2018i4p671-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effectiveness of labour provisions in trade agreements: An analytical and methodological framework

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas AISSI
  • Rafael PEELS
  • Daniel SAMAAN

Abstract

This article puts forward an analytical and methodological framework for examining the effectiveness of labour provisions in trade agreements, illustrated by indicative case studies. Developing the notion of capacity at three levels (state, civil society and firms), the authors differentiate between proximate outcomes (legal, institutional and political) and distant, socio‐economic outcomes (improving labour rights and working conditions). They thus consider labour provisions in trade agreements as a multifaceted “policy mix” to be evaluated through qualitative and/or quantitative methods, depending on the aspect of capacity that is of interest, and on the available data. Some policy recommendations are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas AISSI & Rafael PEELS & Daniel SAMAAN, 2018. "Evaluating the effectiveness of labour provisions in trade agreements: An analytical and methodological framework," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(4), pages 671-698, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:157:y:2018:i:4:p:671-698
    DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12125
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ilr.12125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haberli, Christian. & Jansen, Marion. & Monteiro, José-Antonio., 2012. "Regional trade agreements and domestic labour market regulation," ILO Working Papers 994700163402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. Franz Christian EBERT, 2016. "Labour provisions in EU trade agreements: What potential for channelling labour standards-related capacity building?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 155(3), pages 407-433, September.
    3. Isao Kamata, 2015. "Labor Clauses in Regional Trade Agreements and Effects on Labor Conditions: An Empirical Analysis," Discussion papers e-14-019, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    4. Elva López Mourelo & Daniel Samaan, 2018. "Can labor provisions in trade agreements promote gender equality? Empirical evidence from Cambodia," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 404-433, February.
    5. Damian Raess & Andreas Dür & Dora Sari, 2018. "Protecting labor rights in preferential trade agreements: The role of trade unions, left governments, and skilled labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 143-162, June.
    6. Sabina Dewan & Lucas Ronconi, 2018. "U.S. Free Trade Agreements and Enforcement of Labor Law in Latin America," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 35-56, January.
    7. Berliner, Daniel & Greenleaf, Anne & Lake, Milli & Noveck, Jennifer, 2015. "Building Capacity, Building Rights? State Capacity and Labor Rights in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 127-139.
    8. Sabina Dewan & Lucas Ronconi, 2014. "U.S. Free Trade Agreements and Enforcement of Labor Law in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 87253, Inter-American Development Bank.
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:470016 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Liam CAMPLING & James HARRISON & Ben RICHARDSON & Adrian SMITH, 2016. "Can labour provisions work beyond the border? Evaluating the effects of EU free trade agreements," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 155(3), pages 357-382, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francois, Joseph & Hoekman, Bernard & Manchin, Miriam, 2022. "Pursuing Environmental and Social Objectives through Trade Agreements," Papers 1377, World Trade Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Céline Carrère & Marcelo Olarreaga & Damian Raess, 2022. "Labor clauses in trade agreements: Hidden protectionism?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 453-483, July.
    2. Robertson,Raymond, 2021. "Deep Integration in Trade Agreements : Labor Clauses, Tariffs, and Trade Flows," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9599, The World Bank.
    3. Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2017. "Governance Spillovers of Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements," Working Papers 2017-2, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    4. International Organisation, 2017. "Handbook on Assessment of Labour Provisons in Trade and Investment Arrangements," Working Papers id:11929, eSocialSciences.
    5. Aaditya Mattoo & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta, 2020. "Handbook of Deep Trade Agreements," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34055, December.
    6. Potrafke, Niklas, 2013. "Globalization and labor market institutions: International empirical evidence," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 829-842.
    7. Ronconi, Lucas & Zarazaga S.J., Rodrigo, 2015. "Labor Exclusion and the Erosion of Citizenship Responsibilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 453-461.
    8. Maria Artuso & Carolan McLarney, 2015. "A Race to the Top: Should Labour Standards be Included in Trade Agreements?," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 40(1), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Alice Evans, 2019. "Incentivising Pro-Labour Reforms," CID Working Papers 349, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    10. Fangjin Ye, 2020. "The impact of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) on collective labor rights in developing countries," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 899-921, October.
    11. Hoang, Thi Minh Hang & Nguyen, Thi Lan & Nguyen, Hoang My Linh & Phung, Thi Yen & Tran, Thi Lien Huong, 2014. "Labour provisions in preferential trade agreements: potential opportunities or challenges to Vietnam?," Papers 917, World Trade Institute.
    12. Matthew Amengual & Janice Fine, 2017. "Co‐enforcing Labor standards: the unique contributions of state and worker organizations in Argentina and the United States," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 129-142, June.
    13. John S. Ahlquist & Layna Mosley, 2021. "Firm participation in voluntary regulatory initiatives: The Accord, Alliance, and US garment importers from Bangladesh," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 317-343, April.
    14. Dewey, Matías & Ronconi, Lucas, 2023. "Weberian Civil Service and Labor Enforcement," IZA Discussion Papers 16295, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Paul Welfens & Tony Irawan, 2014. "Transatlantic trade and investment partnership: sectoral and macroeconomic perspectives for Germany, the EU and the US," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 293-328, September.
    16. Tonia NOVITZ, 2020. "Engagement with sustainability at the International Labour Organization and wider implications for collective worker voice," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(4), pages 463-482, December.
    17. Damian Raess & Andreas Dür & Dora Sari, 2018. "Protecting labor rights in preferential trade agreements: The role of trade unions, left governments, and skilled labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 143-162, June.
    18. Dike, Onyemaechi, 2019. "Informal employment and work health risks: Evidence from Cambodia," MPRA Paper 92943, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Mar 2019.
    19. Robert G Blanton & Shannon Lindsey Blanton & Dursun Peksen, 2020. "Confronting human trafficking: The role of state capacity," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(4), pages 471-489, July.
    20. Axel Marx & Franz Ebert & Nicolas Hachez, 2017. "Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 49-59.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:157:y:2018:i:4:p:671-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.