IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp4818.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative Statics for a Consumer with Possibly Multiple Optimum Consumption Bundles

Author

Listed:
  • Dasgupta, Indraneel

    () (Indian Statistical Institute)

  • Pattanaik, Prasanta K.

    () (University of California, Riverside)

Abstract

Non-positivity of the generalized substitution effect, non-positivity of the own-price substitution effect, homogeneity of degree zero in all prices and income, and the law of demand are some of the most primitive comparative static results in the standard revealed preference theory of consumers’ behaviour. These results are however derived for demand functions. The literature does not have corresponding comparative static results for the more plausible case of demand correspondences, where the consumer is permitted to have multiple chosen bundles in a given price-income situation. Using the revealed preference approach to the theory of consumers' behaviour, this note establishes such results for demand correspondences; the analysis can be readily adapted to prove corresponding results in the preference-based approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Dasgupta, Indraneel & Pattanaik, Prasanta K., 2010. "Comparative Statics for a Consumer with Possibly Multiple Optimum Consumption Bundles," IZA Discussion Papers 4818, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp4818.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1994. "Comparing Equilibria," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 441-459, June.
    2. Hicks, J. R., 1986. "A Revision of Demand Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198285502.
    3. Amartya K. Sen, 1971. "Choice Functions and Revealed Preference," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 307-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    demand correspondence; weak axiom of revealed preference; non-positivity of generalized substitution effect; non-positivity of own-price substitution effect; homogeneity of degree zero; law of demand;

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Fallak). General contact details of provider: http://www.iza.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.