IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stan zdrowia w Polsce - rola czynników ekonomiczno-spo³ecznych i stylu zycia.Ocena na podstawie wskaŸnika SRH i PAR


  • Wiktoria Wróblewska

    () (Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.)


W pracy zaprezentowana zosta³a subiektywna miara stanu zdrowia populacji w postaci samooceny stanu zdrowia (SRH). Miara ta jest szeroko stosowanym w badaniach spo³ecznych wskaŸnikiem do oceny stanu zdrowia i wystêpuj¹cych nierównoœci w zdrowiu. W czêœci empirycznej dokonano analizy wp³ywu wybranych czynników na uzyskiwane za pomoc¹ SRH oceny stanu zdrowia osób w wieku 25 lat i wiêcej w Polsce. Skupiono siê na trzech grupach czynników, które charakteryzuj¹ sytuacjê spo³eczno-ekonomiczn¹, sytuacjê rodzinn¹ oraz styl zycia respondenta. Dla oszacowania wp³ywu analizowanych czynników na wystêpowanie negatywnych ocen stanu zdrowia wykorzystano analizê regresji logistycznej. Wyznaczono ponadto wskaŸnik ryzyka populacyjnego (PAR) pozwalaj¹cy na okreœlenie wzglêdnego znaczenia analizowanych zmiennych dla poprawy stanu zdrowia populacji. Podstaw¹ analizy by³y dane z dwóch badañ stanu zdrowia GUS zrealizowanego w latach 1996 oraz 2004. This paper presents self-rated health (SRH) as a right subjective measure of population health. This measure is extensively used as a indicator in social studies for evaluation of health state and health inequality. We analyzed determinants of SRH for people aged 25 and over in Poland, using data from Health Survey of 1996 and 2004. Three groups of factors were examined: socio-economic conditions, family situation and individuals’ life style. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of analyzed factors over the negative assessment of health state. Additionally, we calculated population attributable risk indicator in order to asses relative contribution of the analyzed factors to the improvement in health state of the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiktoria Wróblewska, 2010. "Stan zdrowia w Polsce - rola czynników ekonomiczno-spo³ecznych i stylu zycia.Ocena na podstawie wskaŸnika SRH i PAR," Working Papers 22, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:22

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Bobak, Martin & Pikhart, Hynek & Rose, Richard & Hertzman, Clyde & Marmot, Michael, 2000. "Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 1343-1350, November.
    2. Leinsalu, Mall, 2002. "Social variation in self-rated health in Estonia: a cross-sectional study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 847-861, September.
    3. Manderbacka, Kristiina & Lundberg, Olle & Martikainen, Pekka, 1999. "Do risk factors and health behaviours contribute to self-ratings of health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(12), pages 1713-1720, June.
    4. McFadden, E. & Luben, R. & Bingham, S. & Wareham, N. & Kinmonth, A.-L. & Khaw, K.-T., 2009. "Does the association between self-rated health and mortality vary by social class?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 275-280, January.
    5. Kopp, Maria S. & Skrabski, Árpád & Szedmák, Sándor, 2000. "Psychosocial risk factors, inequality and self-rated morbidity in a changing society," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 1351-1361, November.
    6. Cockerham, William C., 2000. "Health lifestyles in Russia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 1313-1324, November.
    7. Carlson, Per, 1998. "Self-perceived health in East and West Europe: another European health divide," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1355-1366, March.
    8. Bobak, Martin & Pikhart, Hynek & Hertzman, Clyde & Rose, Richard & Marmot, Michael, 1998. "Socioeconomic factors, perceived control and self-reported health in Russia. A cross-sectional survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 269-279, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Milena Borkowska). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.