IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/irs/cepswp/2013-14.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les réseaux de la gouvernance transfrontalière : une centralité changeante du pouvoir étatique ? L'étude de l’Eurométropole de Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai

Author

Listed:
  • DURAND Frédéric
  • LAMOUR Christian

Abstract

Les régions métropolitaines sont devenues des territoires clés des politiques de développement économique nationales. Elles sont également considérées par un nombre croissant d’acteurs décisionnels comme l'une des échelles les plus appropriées pour définir des partenariats efficaces en matière de développement économique et territorial. Cependant, les accords établis, impliquant une série d’acteurs publics et privés, peuvent être considérés comme une perte de pouvoir de l’Etat ou comme une mutation de la puissance étatique en matière de gestion des espaces. Mais qu'en est-il de la gouvernance au sein des aires métropolitaines transfrontalières? Ces régions spécifiques constituent à la fois des constructions politiques structurées par une multitude d'acteurs politiques de différents niveaux, et de grands centres urbains qui transcendent les frontières nationales et sont engagés dans le réseau mondialisé. Pour autant, est-ce que les régions métropolitaines transfrontalières constituent des échelles où le pouvoir d'Etat est remis en cause ou simplement recomposé ? La centralité du pouvoir étatique sera approchée à travers la prise en considération de deux réseaux d’acteurs (transport public et marketing territorial) organisés au sein de l’Eurométropole Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai. Les résultats révèlent qu’un pouvoir étatique tricéphale se met en place pour définir et organiser la gestion métropolitaine transfrontalière.

Suggested Citation

  • DURAND Frédéric & LAMOUR Christian, 2013. "Les réseaux de la gouvernance transfrontalière : une centralité changeante du pouvoir étatique ? L'étude de l’Eurométropole de Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-14, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    • Handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2013-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.liser.lu/publi_viewer.cfm?tmp=2560
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon MacLeod, 2001. "New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 804-829, December.
    2. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    3. Markus Perkmann, 1999. "Building Governance Institutions Across European Borders," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 657-667.
    4. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521564403 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 861-879, December.
    6. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521564298 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    2. Tassilo Herrschel, 2013. "Competitiveness AND Sustainability: Can ‘Smart City Regionalism’ Square the Circle?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2332-2348, August.
    3. Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, 2002. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    4. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. James Wesley Scott, 2007. "Smart Growth as Urban Reform: A Pragmatic 'Recoding' of the New Regionalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 15-35, January.
    6. Joren Jacobs & Henk-Jan Kooij, 2013. "Fading EUphoria at the Dutch-German Border? The Case of Avantis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(3), pages 379-387, July.
    7. Michaela Trippl, 2010. "Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(2), pages 150-160, April.
    8. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    9. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Einar Leknes & Janne Thygesen, 2013. "Europeanisation of Regional Policy Making: A Boolean Analysis of Norwegian Counties' Participation in the Eu's Interreg Programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 381-400, June.
    11. Pallagst, Karina M. & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Kooperation theoretisch: Erklärungsansätze aus europäischer Integration, Regionalismus und Governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 28-40, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Sean Markey & Sarah-Patricia Breen & Kelly Vodden & Jen Daniels, 2015. "Evidence of Place: Becoming a Region in Rural Canada," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 874-891, September.
    13. Andrew Donaldson, 2006. "Performing Regions: Territorial Development and Cultural Politics in a Europe of the Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2075-2092, November.
    14. Mariona Tomàs, 2015. "If Urban Regions are the Answer, What is the Question? Thoughts on the European Experience," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 382-389, March.
    15. John Harrison, 2008. "Stating the Production of Scales: Centrally Orchestrated Regionalism, Regionally Orchestrated Centralism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 922-941, December.
    16. Keith Jacobs, 2004. "Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 817-832, April.
    17. Stijn Oosterlynck & Yuri Kazepov & Andreas Novy & Pieter Cools & Eduardo Barberis & Florian Wukovitsch & Tatiana Saruis & Bernhard Leubolt, 2013. "The butterfly and the elephant: local social innovation, the welfare state and new poverty dynamics," ImPRovE Working Papers 13/03, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    18. Christian Lamour, 2020. "Living together at the cross‐border regional scale in Europe: Supra‐national and trans‐national identity models in the Greater Region," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 755-766, October.
    19. Jo-Anne Everingham & Lynda Cheshire & Geoffrey Lawrence, 2006. "Regional Renaissance? New Forms of Governance in Nonmetropolitan Australia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(1), pages 139-155, February.
    20. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irs:cepswp:2013-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library and Documentation (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepsslu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.