IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iip/wpaper/31.html

A dataset of scientific citations in U.S. patent Office Actions

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle Higham

    (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research)

  • Hannah Kotula

    (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research)

  • Emma Scharfmann

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Steve Gong

    (Google)

  • Gaétan de Rassenfosse

    (Ecole polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne)

Abstract

We present a curated dataset of about 850,000 citations extracted from Office Actions issued by examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These references, historically underused due to accessibility challenges, provide a granular view into the patent examination process and complement traditional front-page citation data. We classify each citation into one of 14 categories and focus on the 265,000 references to scientific literature, which we parse, clean, and disambiguate using machine learning and external bibliographic services. To enhance reusability, disambiguated records are linked to OpenAlex, a comprehensive research metadata platform. The dataset enables new research on examiner behavior, science–technology linkages, and the construction of citation-based metrics. All data and code are openly available to facilitate reuse across disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle Higham & Hannah Kotula & Emma Scharfmann & Steve Gong & Gaétan de Rassenfosse, 2026. "A dataset of scientific citations in U.S. patent Office Actions," Working Papers 31, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:iip:wpaper:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdm-repec.epfl.ch/iip-wpaper/WP31.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • K29 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Other
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iip:wpaper:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gaétan de Rassenfosse (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stip.epfl.ch/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.