IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i2s1751157725000082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoiding the pitfalls of direct linkage: A novelty-driven approach to measuring scientific impact on patents

Author

Listed:
  • Denter, Nils M.
  • Waterstraat, Joe
  • Moehrle, Martin G.

Abstract

Scientific knowledge plays a major role in the generation of new technological knowledge. We present a new novelty-driven approach to measure the influence of science on patents. We overcome the weaknesses of previous methods based on either citations or semantic similarities, both representing direct linkages between documents. We combine patent novelty measurement with technology-specific, scientific dictionaries, which allow us to measure a patent's nearness to science by stable indirect linkages. We apply our indicator “science-driven novelty” to the testbed of RFID technology and confirm its validity by conducting an expert survey. Subsequently, we test how science impacts patent value, finding that scientific influence increases the average value of a patent. Our results suggest several implications. For academics, we recommend not relying solely on analyzing direct links between papers and patents to determine the influence of science on technology. For management, we provide a new tool to assess scientific influences in patents and thus the value of their company's own patent portfolio as well as the portfolios of third parties. Using text as data, the tool is viable at a very early stage and can be helpful in go/no-go decisions for technology management.

Suggested Citation

  • Denter, Nils M. & Waterstraat, Joe & Moehrle, Martin G., 2025. "Avoiding the pitfalls of direct linkage: A novelty-driven approach to measuring scientific impact on patents," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000082
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000082
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.