IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iez/wpaper/1402.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Privacy Concern in Western Balkan Countries: Developing a Typology of Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • Jelena Budak

    (The Institute of Economics, Zagreb)

  • Edo Rajh

    (The Institute of Economics, Zagreb)

  • Ivan-Damir Anic

    (The Institute of Economics, Zagreb)

Abstract

This study examines which segments of population with similar attitudes towards privacy, data protection and surveillance exist in selected Western Balkan countries, and whether they can be differentiated by demographic characteristics and by country of residence. The data collected by survey were analyzed using factor analysis, k-means cluster analysis and chi-square test. The findings indicate that there are three groups of citizens with similar attitudes in selected Western Balkan countries: (1) pro-surveillance oriented citizens, (2) citizens concerned about being surveilled, and (3) citizens opting for better data protection. The identified groups of citizens differ in age, education, employment and country of residence. The results provide insights on how individuals form their attitudes on contemporary privacy, data protection and surveillance issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Ivan-Damir Anic, 2014. "Privacy Concern in Western Balkan Countries: Developing a Typology of Citizens," Working Papers 1402, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
  • Handle: RePEc:iez:wpaper:1402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/174304
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelena Budak & Ivan-Damir Anic & Edo Rajh, 2012. "Public Attitudes towards Surveillance and Privacy in Western Balkans: The Case of Serbia," Working Papers 1203, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    2. Jelena Budak & Ivan-Damir Anic & Edo Rajh, 2011. "Public Attitudes Towards Surveillance and Privacy in Croatia," Working Papers 1101, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    3. Mike Z. Yao & Ronald E. Rice & Kier Wallis, 2007. "Predicting user concerns about online privacy," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(5), pages 710-722, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vedran Recher & Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh, 2015. "Eye in the Sky: Contextualizing Development with Online Privacy Concern in Western Balkan Countries," Working Papers 1502, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Cecere, Grazia & Le Guel, Fabrice & Soulié, Nicolas, 2012. "Perceived Internet privacy concerns on social network in Europe," MPRA Paper 41437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sophie Hemker & Carolina Herrando & Efthymios Constantinides, 2021. "The Transformation of Data Marketing: How an Ethical Lens on Consumer Data Collection Shapes the Future of Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Amel Attour & Marco Baudino & Jackie Krafft & Nathalie Lazaric, 2020. "Determinants of smart energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Post-Print hal-02942483, HAL.
    5. Xu, Zhuo, 2019. "An empirical study of patients' privacy concerns for health informatics as a service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 297-306.
    6. Edo Rajh & Jelena Budak & Mateo Zokalj, 2016. "Personal Values of Internet Users: A Cluster Analytic Approach," Working Papers 1606, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    7. Ruwan Bandara & Mario Fernando & Shahriar Akter, 2020. "Privacy concerns in E-commerce: A taxonomy and a future research agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 629-647, September.
    8. Pagani, Margherita & Malacarne, Giovanni, 2017. "Experiential Engagement and Active vs. Passive Behavior in Mobile Location-based Social Networks: The Moderating Role of Privacy," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 133-148.
    9. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Sunčana Slijepčević & Bruno Škrinjarić, 2021. "Conceptual Research Framework of Consumer Resilience to Privacy Violation Online," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Jelena Budak & Ivan-Damir Anic & Edo Rajh, 2012. "Public Attitudes towards Surveillance and Privacy in Western Balkans: The Case of Serbia," Working Papers 1203, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    11. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Lee, Cheng fang, 2022. "Adoption model of healthcare wearable devices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Cloarec, Julien, 2022. "Privacy controls as an information source to reduce data poisoning in artificial intelligence-powered personalization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 144-153.
    13. Moustaka, Vaia & Theodosiou, Zenonas & Vakali, Athena & Kounoudes, Anastasis & Anthopoulos, Leonidas G., 2019. "Εnhancing social networking in smart cities: Privacy and security borderlines," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 285-300.
    14. Jacopo Arpetti & Marco Delmastro, 2021. "The privacy paradox: a challenge to decision theory?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 505-525, December.
    15. Sophie Cockcroft & Saphira Rekker, 2016. "The relationship between culture and information privacy policy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(1), pages 55-72, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    privacy; data protection; surveillance; typology of citizens; Western Balkans;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iez:wpaper:1402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Doris Banicevic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eizgghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.