IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nlsclt/2023_004.html

Religion, beliefs, trust, and COVID vaccination behavior among rural people in Malawi?

Author

Listed:
  • Holden, Stein T.

    (Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences)

  • Tione, Sarah

    (Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences)

  • Tilahun, Mesfin

    (Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences)

  • Katengeza, Samson

    (Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences)

Abstract

This study investigates the religious and other beliefs related to the corona/COVID-19 pandemic and how they are related to covid risk perceptions, trust in COVID vaccines, and how these are affected by the religious beliefs, religious affiliations, trust in authorities, generalized trust, and how these affect vaccine demand/vaccine hesitancy. The study took place in rural areas in six districts in Central and Southern Regions of Malawi during April-May 2022 towards the end of the fourth wave of the pandemic that was dominated by the omicron variant of the virus, through personal interviews of 835 subjects. The study revealed five religious beliefs associated with the pandemic and one non-religious belief that vaccination would lead to infertility in women. This belief (14% of the sample) and the belief that vaccination leads to a triple-six mark from the Devil (33% of the sample) were strongly negatively associated with trust in the vaccine and the trust in the vaccine had a strong impact on the demand for vaccine/vaccine hesitancy. In addition, certain religious groups were associated with more of these pandemic-related beliefs, lower trust in the vaccines, and lower vaccine demand/stronger vaccine hesitancy. Trust in politicians, health personnel, and generalized trust contributed to stronger trust in vaccines. It may be important to address both the beliefs and some of the religious groups and their leaders to promote vaccine demand and reduce vaccine hesitancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Holden, Stein T. & Tione, Sarah & Tilahun, Mesfin & Katengeza, Samson, 2023. "Religion, beliefs, trust, and COVID vaccination behavior among rural people in Malawi?," CLTS Working Papers 4/23, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2023_004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nmbu.no/download/file/fid/58990
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein T Holden & Mesfin Tilahun, 2021. "Preferences, trust, and performance in youth business groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Sebastian Neumann-Böhme & Nirosha Elsem Varghese & Iryna Sabat & Pedro Pita Barros & Werner Brouwer & Job van Exel & Jonas Schreyögg & Tom Stargardt, 2020. "Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(7), pages 977-982, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tine Buyl & Thomas Gehrig & Jonas Schreyögg & Andreas Wieland, 2022. "Resilience: A Critical Appraisal of the State of Research for Business and Society," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 453-463, December.
    2. Krishna Reddy Gujjula & Jiangyue Gong & Brittany Segundo & Lewis Ntaimo, 2022. "COVID-19 vaccination policies under uncertain transmission characteristics using stochastic programming," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Xiang, Hongzhe & Li, Yiwei & Guo, Yu, 2023. "Promoting COVID-19 booster vaccines in Macao: A psychological reactance perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    4. Thomas Wein, 2021. "Ist eine Impfpflicht gegen das Coronavirus nötig? [Is Mandatory Vaccination Against the Coronavirus Necessary?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(2), pages 114-120, February.
    5. Jacques Bughin & Michele Cincera & Kelly Peters & Dorota Reykowska & Marcin Zyszkiewicz & Rafal Ohme, 2021. "Make it or Break it: Vaccination Intention at the Time of Covid-19," Working Papers TIMES² 2021-043, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Principe, Francesco & Weber, Guglielmo, 2023. "Online health information seeking and Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from 50+ Europeans," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Sebastian Neumann-Böhme & Iryna Sabat & Carolin Brinkmann & Arthur E. Attema & Tom Stargardt & Jonas Schreyögg & Werner Brouwer, 2023. "Jumping the Queue:Willingness to Pay for Faster Access to COVID-19 Vaccines in Seven European Countries," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(10), pages 1389-1402, October.
    8. Codruta Mare & Stefana Belbe & Norbert Petrovici, 2025. "Exploring the spatial clustering and spillover effects of COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Romania: an analysis at municipality level," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 109(4), pages 667-688, December.
    9. Muhammad Usman & Li Yuyan & Mudassir Husnain & Muhammad Waheed Akhtar, 2024. "COVID-19, travel restrictions and environmental consequences," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 10261-10281, April.
    10. Abas Khan & Mohd Sarwar Mir, 2021. "Acceptance of COVID 19 Vaccine in India," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 37(4), pages 29692-29693, August.
    11. Josselin Thuilliez & Nouhoum Touré, 2024. "Opinions and vaccination during an epidemic," Post-Print hal-04490900, HAL.
    12. Ashlin Lee & Marian Sheppard & Claire K. Naughtin & Megan A. Rebuli & Emily Brindal, 2025. "Key Predictors that Characterize Different Stances on Significant Global Scientific Challenges: Comparing Vaccine and Climate Change Beliefs," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    13. Keser, Claudia & Rau, Holger A., 2022. "Policy incentives and determinants of citizens' COVID-19 vaccination motives," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 434, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    14. de Ridder, Denise & Adriaanse, Marieke & van Gestel, Laurens & Wachner, Jonas, 2023. "How does nudging the COVID-19 vaccine play out in people who are in doubt about vaccination?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Jian Cao & Christina M. Ramirez & R. Michael Alvarez, 2022. "The politics of vaccine hesitancy in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(1), pages 42-54, January.
    16. Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan & Somtip Watanapongvanich & Yoshihiko Kadoya, 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among the Younger Generation in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Joan Costa‐Font & Caroline Rudisill & Sayward Harrison & Luca Salmasi, 2023. "The social value of a SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine: Willingness to pay estimates from four western countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1818-1835, August.
    18. Agustí Segarra‐Blasco & Mercedes Teruel & Sebastiano Cattaruzzo, 2024. "The international trade in human vaccines before COVID‐19," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1978-2008, May.
    19. Peer Henri Kieweg & Stefanie Schöberl & Gabriele Palozzi, 2021. "The Role of Communication In COVID-19 Crisis Management: Findings about Information Behavior of German and Italian Young People," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(5), pages 263-288, October.
    20. Daniel Graeber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri & Carsten Schröder, 2020. "Hohe Impfbereitschaft gegen Covid-19 in Deutschland, Impfpflicht bleibt kontrovers," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1103, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2023_004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Ephrida Tione (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ioumbno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.