IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/cbslpf/2002_013.html

From Quality Control to Quality Monitoring and Organisational Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Hemlin, Sven

    (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)

  • Wenneberg, Søren Barlebo

    (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)

Abstract

Quality control is an important and integrated part of the scientific system. However, developments in science are changing quality control into quality monitoring. New virtual and fluid organisational forms are emerging. Common boundaries are broken as for example in the “Triple Helix” and the “Mode 2” concepts. And the stakeholders in science are becoming interested in being involved. They want their evaluation criteria to be used, and they want evaluations to be done on a regular basis, because they do not trust the new scientific institutions to be left alone. Quality monitoring changes the assumptions for doing evaluations as part of quality control. Assessment of the societal value of research becomes increasingly important. Finally, quality monitoring emphasises organisational learning rather than controlling quality in scientific organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemlin, Sven & Wenneberg, Søren Barlebo, 2002. "From Quality Control to Quality Monitoring and Organisational Learning," Working Papers 13/2002, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:2002_013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://openarchive.cbs.dk/handle/10398/6333
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braun, Dietmar, 1993. "Who Governs Intermediary Agencies? Principal-Agent Relations in Research Policy-Making," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 135-162, April.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:14271 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Frederiksen, Frode & Hansson, Finn & Wenneberg, Søren, 2001. "Knowledge Assessment in the Agora," Working Papers 14/2001, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braun, Dietmar & Benninghoff, Martin, 2003. "Policy learning in Swiss research policy--the case of the National Centres of Competence in Research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1849-1863, December.
    2. Hayashi, Takayuki, 2003. "Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1421-1442, September.
    3. Anwr ELBASIR & Kalim SIDDIQUI, 2018. "Higher education, funding, polices and politics: A critical review," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, EconSciences Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 152-167, June.
    4. Manuel Fischer & Philip Leifeld, 2015. "Policy forums: Why do they exist and what are they used for?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 363-382, September.
    5. Budzinski, Oliver & Eckert, Sandra, 2015. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 93, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    6. Braun, Dietmar, 1998. "The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 807-821, December.
    7. Van der Meulen, Barend, 1998. "Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 397-414, August.
    8. Landoni, Matteo & ogilvie, dt, 2019. "Convergence of innovation policies in the European aerospace industry (1960–2000)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 174-184.
    9. Kushlin, Valery & Ustenko, Viktoriya, 2017. "Modern World Practice of State Support of Perspective Scientific and Innovative Programs: Evaluation of the Developed Mechanisms of State Management of Innovation Development in the Context of Time Challenges," Working Papers 041718, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    10. Talmar, Madis & Walrave, Bob & Raven, Rob & Romme, A. Georges L., 2022. "Dynamism in policy-affiliated transition intermediaries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Martino Maggetti, 2007. "De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy‐set analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(4), pages 271-294, December.
    12. Sujit Bhattacharya & Arshia Kaul & Shilpa & Praveen Sharma, 2015. "Role of bilateral institution in influencing collaboration: case study of CEFIPRA—a bilateral S&T institution established by India and France," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 169-194, January.
    13. Boon, Wouter P.C. & Moors, Ellen H.M. & Kuhlmann, Stefan & Smits, Ruud E.H.M., 2011. "Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 242-252, March.
    14. Owen, Richard & Pansera, Mario & Macnaghten, Phil & Randles, Sally, 2021. "Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    15. Yih-Chearng Shiue & Ming-Chang Lee & Pei-Jian Lin & Yao-Wen Huang, 2015. "Investor and venture fund managers remuneration paid mechanism based on principle-agent model," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(9), pages 143-151, September.
    16. Takayuki Hayashi, 2003. "Bibliometric analysis on additionality of Japanese R&D programmes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 301-316, March.
    17. Luis Sanz-Menendez & Laura Cruz-Castro, 2005. "Critical Surveys Edited by Stephen Roper," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 939-954.
    18. Seolmin Yang & So Young Kim, 2023. "Knowledge-integrated research is more disruptive when supported by homogeneous funding sources: a case of US federally funded research in biomedical and life sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3257-3282, June.
    19. Bruce Currie-Alder & Rigas Arvanitis & Sari Hanafi, 2018. "Research in Arabic-speaking countries: Funding competitions, international collaboration, and career incentives," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 74-82.
    20. Yingbo Li & Zihan Wang & Mariano Andres Imbert Rodriguez & Zheng Liang & Liyu Zhao, 2025. "Defining organized R&D: collective action for mission-oriented innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:2002_013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lars Nondal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbschdk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.