IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Knowledge Assessment in the Agora

Listed author(s):
  • Frederiksen, Frode

    (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)

  • Hansson, Finn

    (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)

  • Wenneberg, Søren

    (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)

Registered author(s):

    The internal scientific evaluation of knowledge claims done by peer review is todayhas for the last 20 years been supplemented by new methods of knowledge assessment. These methods are usually taken from other sectors such as the public administration and the corporate sector. Because of their different backgrounds compared to the peer review method, it is necessary to critically examine them in relation to assessment of quality. But this also calls for a new understanding of science and knowledge. The article starts by briefly explaining this new understanding, before going into more details on the new methods of knowledge assessment and the perspectives behind them.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://openarchive.cbs.dk/handle/10398/6357
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy in its series Working Papers with number 14/2001.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 16 pages
    Date of creation: 01 Dec 2001
    Handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:2001_014
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School, Blaagaardsgade 23 B, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

    Phone: +45 3815 3815
    Web page: http://www.cbs.dk/departments/mpp/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Ernø-Kjølhede, Erik & Husted, Kenneth & Mønsted, Mette & Wenneberg, Søren Barlebo, 2001. "Managing University Research In the Triple Helix," Working Papers 13/2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:2001_014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lars Nondal)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.