IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-03611751.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les freelances du numérique au prisme de « l’économie collaborative »

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick Fondeur

    (LISE - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire pour la sociologie économique - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CEET - Centre d'études de l'emploi et du travail - Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam] - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé, Cnam - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam])

Abstract

L'économie collaborative et le développement de plateformes d'échanges ont conduit à la diffusion de nouvelles pratiques de consommation, de production et de financement. Les formes diverses que peut prendre cette économie sont encore peu appréhendées par la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales. Quelles formes émergentes d'économie collaborative ? Quelles conséquences sur les modalités d'emploi, les conditions de travail et la protection sociale des travailleurs collaboratifs ? La recherche de Yannick Fondeur croise trois champs porteurs d'enjeux majeurs en termes de travail et d'emploi : le freelancing, régulièrement présenté comme la plaque avancée de « l'avenir du travail » (Future of Work) ; la plateformisation et l'« économie collaborative », vecteurs supposés d'une transformation profonde des formes productives et d'emploi ; les métiers du numérique, segment « en tension » du marché du travail et réservoir supposé d'emplois qualifiés pour les années à venir. La focale est portée sur le secteur de la prestation de services intellectuels aux entreprises, et plus particulièrement sur les développeurs indépendants, souvent désignés comme les nouveaux « sublimes » en références aux ouvriers très qualifiés du XIXe siècle, imprimeurs ou mécaniciens, qui pouvaient, dans une configuration de marché qui leur était favorable, maîtriser leurs engagements et leur mobilité, concilier travail et projets personnels.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick Fondeur, 2021. "Les freelances du numérique au prisme de « l’économie collaborative »," Working Papers hal-03611751, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03611751
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://cnam.hal.science/hal-03611751v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cnam.hal.science/hal-03611751v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    2. Bernard Convert & Florence Jany-Catrice & Richard Sobel, 2008. "Éditorial. Prouver le mouvement en marchant. Contexte, enjeux et ambitions de la RFSE," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(1), pages 3-7.
    3. Isabelle Berrebi-Hoffmann & Michel Lallement & Odile Piriou, 2010. "La division internationale du travail dans les services informatiques : off-shore et politiques des ressources humaines dans les grandes SSII," Working Papers halshs-01128921, HAL.
    4. Marie-Christine Bureau & Antonella Corsani, 2015. "Les coopératives d'activité et d'emploi : pratiques d'innovation institutionnelle," Post-Print hal-01376315, HAL.
    5. David S. Evans & Richard Schmalensee, 2013. "The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses," NBER Working Papers 18783, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satish Nambisan & Shaker A. Zahra & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1464-1486, December.
    2. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Joao Correia‐da‐Silva & Bruno Jullien & Yassine Lefouili & Joana Pinho, 2019. "Horizontal mergers between multisided platforms: Insights from Cournot competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 109-124, January.
    4. Pierre Andreoletti & Pierre Gaze & Maxime Menuet, 2015. "Can a Platform Make Profit with Consumer' Mobility? A Two-Sided Monopoly Model with Random Endogenous Side-Swiching," Working Papers halshs-01206576, HAL.
    5. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    6. Kirill V. SIMONOV, 2019. "The two-sided trade fair market: Identifying attributes and value creation management," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 24-37, September.
    7. Peitz, Martin & Samkharadze, Lily, 2022. "Collusion between non-differentiated two-sided platforms," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Eric Darmon & Thomas Le Texier & Zhiwen Li & Thierry Pénard, 2019. "Multimarket Contact and Platform Competition: Reassessing the Mutual Forbearance Hypothesis," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 2019-07, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
    9. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:779-797 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Caccinelli, Chiara & Toledano, Joëlle, 2017. "Assessing Anticompetitive Practices in Two-Sided Markets: A Comparative Analysis of four Antitrust Proceedings against Booking.com," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169452, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Patrick Loux & Mathilde Aubry & Sébastien Tran & Emmanuel Baudoin, 2020. "Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts : the role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions," Post-Print hal-02376313, HAL.
    12. Baranes, Edmond & Cortade, Thomas & Cosnita-Langlais, Andreea, 2019. "Horizontal mergers on platform markets: cost savings v. cross-group network effects?," MPRA Paper 97459, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Estelle Malavolti, 2016. "Single Till or Dual Till at airports: a Two-Sided Market Analysis," Post-Print hal-01406372, HAL.
    14. Martin Peitz & Sven Rady & Piers Trepper, 2017. "Experimentation in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 128-172.
    15. Lam, W., 2015. "Switching Costs in Two-sided Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    17. Waterson, Michael, 2023. "Platforms as arbitrageurs and facilitators of arbitrage- a simple analysis," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1481, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    18. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Buechel, Berno & Krähenmann, Philemon, 2022. "Fixed price equilibria on peer‐to‐peer platforms: Lessons from time‐based currencies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 335-358.
    20. Amelio, Andrea & Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane & Valletti, Tommaso, 2020. "Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    21. Renato Gomes & Alessandro Pavan, 2013. "Cross-Subsidization and Matching Design," Discussion Papers 1559, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-03611751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.