IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03562657.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bibliometric analysis of sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Saglietto

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to review the literature on sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics to answer the three following questions: How is the literature on sharing economy logistics structured? What are the main trends in sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics? What are the future research options? Design/methodology/approach Bibliometric analysis is used to evaluate 85 articles published over the past 12 years; it identifies the top academic journals, authors and research topics contributing to the field. Findings The sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics literature is structured around several disciplines and highlights that some are more scientifically advanced than others in their subject definitions, designs, modelling and innovative solutions. The main trends are organized around three clusters: Cluster 1 refers to the optimal allocation of costs, prices, distribution and supplier relationships; Cluster 2 corresponds to business related crowdsourcing and international industry practices; and Cluster 3 includes the impact of transport on last-mile delivery, crowd shipping and the environment. Research limitations/implications The study is based on data from peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences. A broader overview could include other data sources such as books, book chapters, working papers, etc. Originality/value Future research directions are discussed in the context of the evolution from crowd logistics to crowd intelligence, and the complexities of crowd logistics such as understanding how the social crowd can be integrated into the logistics process. Our results are part of the crowd science and engineering concept and provide some answers about crowd cyber-system questions regarding crowd intelligence in logistic sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Saglietto, 2021. "Bibliometric analysis of sharing economy logistics and crowd logistics," Post-Print halshs-03562657, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03562657
    DOI: 10.1108/IJCS-07-2020-0014
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03562657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03562657/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJCS-07-2020-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akeb, Hakim & Moncef, Btissam & Durand, Bruno, 2018. "Building a collaborative solution in dense urban city settings to enhance parcel delivery: An effective crowd model in Paris," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 223-233.
    2. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    3. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    4. Bruno Durand & Hakim Akeb & Btissam Moncef, 2018. "Building a collaborative solution in dense urban city settings to enhance parcel delivery: An effective crowd model in Paris [L'élaboration d'une solution collaborative de livraisons urbaines en vu," Post-Print hal-01781155, HAL.
    5. Scavarda, Manuel & Seok, Hyesung & Puranik, Anurag S. & Nof, Shimon Y., 2015. "Adaptive direct/indirect delivery decision protocol by collaborative negotiation among manufacturers, distributors, and retailers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 232-245.
    6. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Zhong, Guan-Yu, 2017. "The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Robert J. David & Shin‐Kap Han, 2004. "A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 39-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joash Mageto, 2022. "Current and Future Trends of Information Technology and Sustainability in Logistics Outsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Xiao, Fei & Wang, Haijun & Guo, Shuojia & Guan, Xu & Liu, Baoshan, 2021. "Efficient and truthful multi-attribute auctions for crowdsourced delivery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Wang, Haibo & Alidaee, Bahram, 2023. "White-glove service delivery: A quantitative analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Wang, Yi-Jia & Wang, Yue & Huang, George Q. & Lin, Ciyun, 2024. "Public acceptance of crowdsourced delivery from a customer perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 793-805.
    7. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    8. Hou, Ting & Zhang, Wen, 2021. "Optimal two-stage elimination contests for crowdsourcing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Liu, Feng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Zhang, Zhuoye & Zhang, Fangni, 2024. "Optimal operation strategies of an urban crowdshipping platform in asset-light, asset-medium, or asset-heavy business format," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Quan Dai & Hongfei Jia & Yao Liu, 2020. "Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(2), pages 15501477209, February.
    12. Le, Tho V. & Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Xue, Jiawei & Van Woensel, Tom, 2021. "Designing pricing and compensation schemes by integrating matching and routing models for crowd-shipping systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Chen, Cheng & Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Qiu, Rongzu, 2021. "The adoption of self-driving delivery robots in last mile logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Rossolov, Oleksandr & Susilo, Yusak O., 2024. "Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Anuj Mittal & Amy A. Marusak & Caroline C. Krejci & Narjes Sadeghiamirshahidi & K. Jamie Rogers, 2022. "Evaluating the Suitability of Crowd-Shipping Platforms for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Luo, Hao & Yang, Xuan & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2019. "A synchronized production-warehouse management solution for reengineering the online-offline integrated order fulfillment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 211-230.
    17. Yu, Yaoqin & Lian, Feng & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2021. "Pricing of parcel locker service in urban logistics by a TSP model of last-mile delivery," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 206-214.
    18. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    19. He, Bo & Mirchandani, Prakash & Wang, Yong, 2020. "Removing barriers for grocery stores: O2O platform and self-scheduling delivery capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Ma, Fei & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2019. "The determinants of customers’ intention to use smart lockers for last-mile deliveries," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 316-326.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03562657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.