IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02505930.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Repenser l’échec entrepreneurial des petites entreprises émergentes

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Smida

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nabil Khelil

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Créer une entreprise demeure aujourd'hui une initiative très risquée. Même si les statistiques montrent que la disparition précoce d'une jeune petite entreprise est un destin plus probable que sa survie, la littérature scientifique sur l'entrepreneuriat se concentre sur la réussite entrepreneuriale. Les petites entreprises émergentes qui échouent demeurent un groupe peu étudié. En plus, il n'y a pas de consensus sur la signification de l'échec entrepreneurial qui, d'ailleurs, par sa nature multidimensionnelle et complexe, peut revêtir plusieurs configurations. Dans le but de mieux percevoir l'échec entrepreneurial, le présent article propose une typologie articulée autour des trois théories : la théorie d'écologie des populations des organisations, l'approche fondée sur les ressources et la théorie de la « brèche aspirations-réalisations ». L'écologie des populations des organisations perçoit l'échec en termes de mortalité. Basée sur la primauté des ressources, l'approche du même nom analyse l'échec en termes de défaillance économique. La troisième théorie accorde un rôle important à la motivation entrepreneuriale. Pour la théorie de la « brèche aspirations-réalisations », l'échec est associé à la déception personnelle du fondateur à la suite de la non-concrétisation de ses aspirations et attentes initiales. À travers la combinaison de ces trois approches, cet article élabore une typologie de huit catégories ou scénarios d'échec. Il tente d'aller au-delà de la dichotomie classique qui oppose l' « échec total » et la « réussite absolue ». Il introduit les scénarios d'« échec marginal » et d'« échec partiel ». Une analyse qualitative exploratoire fondée sur l'étude de 10 cas a servi à illustrer cette typologie.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Smida & Nabil Khelil, 2010. "Repenser l’échec entrepreneurial des petites entreprises émergentes," Post-Print halshs-02505930, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02505930
    DOI: 10.7202/1005762ar
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02505930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02505930/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7202/1005762ar?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth R. Gray & Howard Foster & Marla Howard, 2006. "Motivations Of Moroccans To Be Entrepreneurs," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 297-318.
    2. Rafik Abdesselam & Jean Bonnet & Nicolas Le Pape, 2004. "An Explanation of the Life Span of New French Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 237-254, October.
    3. Michael Fritsch & Udo Brixy & Oliver Falck, 2006. "The Effect of Industry, Region, and Time on New Business Survival – A Multi-Dimensional Analysis," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 28(3), pages 285-306, May.
    4. Cooper, Arnold C. & Artz, Kendall W., 1995. "Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 439-457, November.
    5. Fotopoulos, Georgios & Louri, Helen, 2000. "Location and Survival of New Entry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 311-321, June.
    6. Thornhill, Stewart & Amit, Raphael, 2003. "Comprendre l'echec : mortalite organisationnelle et approche fondee sur les ressources," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2003202f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    7. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    8. Baldwin, John R. Bian, Lin Dupuy, Richard Gellatly, Guy, 2000. "Taux d'échec des nouvelles entreprises canadiennes : nouvelles perspectives sur les entrées et les sorties," Taux d'échec des nouvelles entreprises canadiennes : nouvelles perspectives sur les entrées et les sorties, Statistics Canada, Division de l'analyse économique, number stcb5f, March.
    9. Everett, Jim & Watson, John, 1998. "Small Business Failure and External Risk Factors," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 371-390, December.
    10. Lois M. Shelton, 2005. "Scale Barriers And Growth Opportunities: A Resource-Based Model Of New Venture Expansion," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 333-357.
    11. Singh, Smita & Corner, Patricia & Pavlovich, Kathryn, 2007. "Coping with entrepreneurial failure," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 331-344, November.
    12. Rafik Abdesselam & Jean Bonnet & Nicolas Le Pape, 2004. "An explanation of the life span of new firms : an empirical analysis from French data," Post-Print halshs-00069109, HAL.
    13. Shepherd, Dean A. & Douglas, Evan J. & Shanley, Mark, 2000. "New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(5-6), pages 393-410.
    14. Stearns, Timothy M. & Carter, Nancy M. & Reynolds, Paul D. & Williams, Mary L., 1995. "New firm survival: Industry, strategy, and location," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 23-42, January.
    15. Venkataraman, S. & Van De Ven, Andrew H. & Buckeye, Jeanne & Hudson, Roger, 1990. "Starting up in a turbulent environment: A process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 5(5), pages 277-295, September.
    16. Frank Lasch & Frédéric Le Roy & Saïd Yami, 2005. "Les déterminants de la survie et de la croissance des start-up TIC," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 155(2), pages 37-56.
    17. Jason Cope & Frank Cave & Sue Eccles, 2004. "Attitudes of venture capital investors towards entrepreneurs with previous business failure," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2-3), pages 147-172, February.
    18. C. Mirjam van Praag, 2003. "Business Survival and Success of Young Small Business Owners," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 03-050/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Hannu Littunen & Esa Storhammar & Tuomo Nenonen, 1998. "The survival of firms over the critical first 3 years and the local environment," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 189-202, January.
    20. Honjo, Yuji, 2000. "Business failure of new firms: an empirical analysis using a multiplicative hazards model," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 557-574, May.
    21. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Impact of Strategies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 13, pages 167-181, Palgrave Macmillan.
    22. Cooper, Arnold C. & Gimeno-Gascon, F. Javier & Woo, Carolyn Y., 1994. "Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 9(5), pages 371-395, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khelil, Nabil, 2016. "The many faces of entrepreneurial failure: Insights from an empirical taxonomy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 72-94.
    2. Marco Cantamessa & Valentina Gatteschi & Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2018. "Startups’ Roads to Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Martin Carree & Ingrid Verheul & Enrico Santarelli, 2011. "Sectoral patterns of firm exit in Italian provinces," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 499-517, August.
    4. Nam Pham Xuan & Thanh Ha Le, 2023. "Bribery and firm survival in Vietnam: Moderating effects of market competition, credit, and institutional constraints," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 1242-1269, May.
    5. Lucio Fuentelsaz & Consuelo Gonz�lez-Gil & Juan P. Maicas, 2015. "What determines entepreneurial failure: taking advantage of the institutional context," Documentos de Trabajo dt2015-05, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.
    6. Sahar Ayadi & Sonia Zouari Ghorbel, 2018. "Relevance of the Mann Whitney Wilcoxon test in the survival analysis of newly established companies in Tunisia (Case of the sfax region)," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Xi, Guoqian & Block, Jörn & Lasch, Frank & Robert, Frank & Thurik, Roy, 2017. "How Does Firm Survival Differ between Business Takeovers and New Venture Start-ups?," IZA Discussion Papers 11155, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Gottschalk, Sandra & Greene, Francis J. & Höwer, Daniel & Müller, Bettina, 2014. "If you don't succeed, should you try again? The role of entrepreneurial experience in venture survival," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-009, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Nicola Del Sarto & Alberto Di Minin & Giulio Ferrigno & Andrea Piccaluga, 2021. "Born global and well educated: start-up survival through fuzzy set analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1405-1423, April.
    10. Masatoshi Kato & Koichiro Onishi & Yuji Honjo, 2022. "Does patenting always help new firm survival? Understanding heterogeneity among exit routes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 449-475, August.
    11. Jean-Pierre Huiban, 2011. "The spatial demography of new plants: urban creation and rural survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 73-86, July.
    12. Carla Daniela Calá & Miguel Manjón-Antolín & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2017. "Regional Determinants of Exit Across Firms’ Size: Evidence from Argentina," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(6), pages 768-785, December.
    13. Cheng Shu & Sharon A. Simmons, 2018. "Firm survival in traded industries: does localization moderate the effects of founding team experience?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 643-655, March.
    14. Marco Caliendo & Maximilian Goethner & Martin Weißenberger, 2020. "Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: Measurement and determinants," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 617-647, May.
    15. Alexandre Farias Albuquerque & Edmundo Escrivão Filho & Marcelo Seido Nagano & Luiz Adalberto Philippsen Junior, 2016. "A change in the importance of mortality factors throughout the life cycle stages of small businesses," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Harald Strotmann, 2007. "Entrepreneurial Survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 87-104, January.
    17. Calá, Carla Daniela, 2014. "Regional issues on firm entry and exit in Argentina: core and peripheral regions," Nülan. Deposited Documents 2023, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    18. Chi Zhang & Qingjun Zeng & Charles Chen & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Nipun Dhaulta, 2023. "The Strategic Resources and Competitive Performance of Family-Owned and Non-Family-Owned Firms in the Retail Business of Los Angeles," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 327-355, March.
    19. Peter van der Zwan & Ingrid Verheul & Roy Thurik & Isabel Grilo, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Progress: Climbing the Entrepreneurial Ladder in Europe and the US," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-070/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 17 Mar 2010.
    20. Stewart Thornhill & Raphael Amit, 2003. "Learning About Failure: Bankruptcy, Firm Age, and the Resource-Based View," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 497-509, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02505930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.