IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01239670.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Causal linkages between supply chain management practices and performance: a balanced scorecard strategy map perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Brulhart

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Uche Okongwu

    (Department of Industrial Organisation, Logistics and Technology - Toulouse Business School)

  • Btissam Moncef

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate, from a balanced scorecard strategy map perspective, the types of linkages – sequential, non-sequential, intra-dependent, and reverse – through which supply chain management practices (SCMP) impact on financial and non-financial performance, and consequently lead to the achievement of the firm's strategic objectives. Design/methodology/approach – This study is carried out in two stages. Firstly, based on the survey data collected from 450 French industrial firms (with a return rate of 20.2%), structural equation modelling (SEM) is used to test eight hypotheses that are formulated through the discussion of previous theoretical and empirical findings in extant literature. Then, based on the framework of the balanced scorecard strategy map, the SEM results are used to discuss the linkages between SCMP and firm performance. Findings – After confirming some of the relationships already observed in extant literature, our results show that there are many strategic paths (of different nature) that link supply chain management practices and other intangible assets to financial performance. Practical implications – The results of our study constitute a practical contribution that would guide managers in the strategic alignment of their firm's supply chain initiatives with corporate strategy. We argue that when implementing SCM initiatives, managers should pay particular attention to how intangible assets act as mediating factors in the achievement of the firm's financial objectives. The BSC framework that we propose can also be used by researchers to investigate causal linkages between intangible and tangible assets. Originality/value – There are few studies that adopt an extensive multi-dimensional approach by looking simultaneously at both upstream and downstream linkages of the supply chain while taking into account many performance measures. Using the balanced scorecard strategic map framework, this paper proposes eight types of linkages that could lead to the achievement of the firm's strategic goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Brulhart & Uche Okongwu & Btissam Moncef, 2015. "Causal linkages between supply chain management practices and performance: a balanced scorecard strategy map perspective," Post-Print halshs-01239670, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01239670
    DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-01-2013-0002
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01239670v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01239670v2/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JMTM-01-2013-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim Langfield‐Smith & Michelle R Greenwood, 1998. "Developing Co‐operative Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Case Study of Toyota," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 331-353, May.
    2. Kim, Soo Wook, 2009. "An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 328-346, June.
    3. Li, Suhong & Ragu-Nathan, Bhanu & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Subba Rao, S., 2006. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 107-124, April.
    4. Roger J. Calantone & Jeffrey B. Schmidt & X. Michael Song, 1996. "Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 341-358.
    5. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2013. "The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 566-574.
    6. Srinivasan, Mahesh & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Gaur, Ajai S., 2011. "Buyer-supplier partnership quality and supply chain performance: Moderating role of risks, and environmental uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 260-271, August.
    7. Susan Cohen Kulp & Hau L. Lee & Elie Ofek, 2004. "Manufacturer Benefits from Information Integration with Retail Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 431-444, April.
    8. Hsin Chang & Chung-Jye Hung & Kit Wong & Chin-Ho Lee, 2013. "Using the balanced scorecard on supply chain integration performance—a case study of service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 539-561, December.
    9. Hsin Hsin Chang, 2009. "An empirical study of evaluating supply chain management integration using the balanced scorecard in Taiwan," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 185-202, February.
    10. Sandra Cohen & Dimitris Thiraios & Myrto Kandilorou, 2008. "Performance parameters interrelations from a balanced scorecard perspective: An analysis of Greek companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(5), pages 485-503, May.
    11. Yu, Wantao & Jacobs, Mark A. & Salisbury, W. David & Enns, Harvey, 2013. "The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 346-358.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adejare Yusuff Aremu & Arfan Shahzad & Shahizan Hassan, 2021. "The Empirical Evidence of Enterprise Resource Planning System Adoption and Implementation on Firm’s Performance Among Medium-Sized Enterprises," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1375-1404, December.
    2. Andrea Guerrini & Giulia Romano & Simone Ferretti & Donatella Fibbi & Daniele Daddi, 2016. "A Performance Measurement Tool Leading Wastewater Treatment Plants toward Economic Efficiency and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Dinçer, Hasan & Hacıoğlu, Ümit & Yüksel, Serhat, 2017. "Balanced scorecard based performance measurement of European airlines using a hybrid multicriteria decision making approach under the fuzzy environment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 17-33.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdurrezzak Sener & Mehmet Barut & Ali Dag & Mehmet Bayram Yildirim, 2021. "Impact of commitment, information sharing, and information usage on supplier performance: a Bayesian belief network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 125-158, August.
    2. Sener, Abdurrezzak & Barut, Mehmet & Oztekin, Asil & Avcilar, Mutlu Yuksel & Yildirim, Mehmet Bayram, 2019. "The role of information usage in a retail supply chain: A causal data mining and analytical modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 87-104.
    3. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    4. Prajogo, Daniel & Toy, Jordan & Bhattacharya, Ananya & Oke, Adegoke & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 95-103.
    5. Jing Li & Chien-Wen Chen & Chi-Hui Wu & Hsing-Chun Hung & Ching-Torng Lin, 2020. "How do Partners Benefit from IT Use in Supply-Chain Management: An Empirical Study of Taiwan’s Bicycle Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jacobs, Mark A. & Yu, Wantao & Chavez, Roberto, 2016. "The effect of internal communication and employee satisfaction on supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 60-70.
    7. Ra’ed Masa’deh & Ismail Muheisen & Bader Obeidat & Ashraf Bany Mohammad, 2022. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Operational Performance: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Hu, Da-Chian & Ding, Li-Wen, 2017. "Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 143-153.
    9. Yang, Qian & Zhao, Xiande, 2016. "Are logistics outsourcing partners more integrated in a more volatile environment?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 211-220.
    10. Huu Tuyen Duong & Gilles Paché, 2016. "Relational integration between supply chain members: Proposal of a measurement scale applicable to Asian emerging countries," Post-Print hal-01436446, HAL.
    11. Li, Siyu & Huo, Baofeng & Han, Zhaojun, 2022. "A literature review towards theories and conceptual models of empirical studies on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    12. Prajogo, Daniel & Olhager, Jan, 2012. "Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-522.
    13. Miklós Pakurár & Hossam Haddad & János Nagy & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2019. "The Impact of Supply Chain Integration and Internal Control on Financial Performance in the Jordanian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Rota, Cosimo & Reynolds, Nikolai & Zanasi, Cesare, 2012. "Collaboration and Sustainable Relationships: their Contribution to the Life Cycle Analysis in Agri-Food Supply Chains," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144982, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    15. Liao, Shu-Hsien & Kuo, Fang-I, 2014. "The study of relationships between the collaboration for supply chain, supply chain capabilities and firm performance: A case of the Taiwan׳s TFT-LCD industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 295-304.
    16. Qrunfleh, Sufian & Tarafdar, Monideepa, 2014. "Supply chain information systems strategy: Impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 340-350.
    17. Hong, Jiangtao & Liao, Yi & Zhang, Yibin & Yu, Zhefu, 2019. "The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 227-235.
    18. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Maria Angeles Ramon-Jeronimo, 2017. "Understanding the Generation of Value along Supply Chains: Balancing Control Information and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Downstream and Upstream Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-31, August.
    19. Kyu Kim, Kyung & Yul Ryoo, Sung & Dug Jung, Myung, 2011. "Inter-organizational information systems visibility in buyer-supplier relationships: The case of telecommunication equipment component manufacturing industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 667-676, December.
    20. Qi, Yinan & Huo, Baofeng & Wang, Zhiqiang & Yeung, Hoi Yan Jeff, 2017. "The impact of operations and supply chain strategies on integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 162-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01239670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.