IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05581311.html

Intersection of negotiation and sustainability in business: review and future research

Author

Listed:
  • Ghazal Layeghi

    (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)

  • Adrian Borbély

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Andrea Caputo

    (UNITN - Università degli Studi di Trento = University of Trento)

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to contribute to the intersection of negotiation and sustainability. These two domains have often overlooked each other's importance despite their shared concerns with cooperation, coordination and value creation. Our study moves beyond descriptive mapping by integrating fragmented research streams and, through a set of original propositions, offers a forward-looking agenda for research and practice. Design/methodology/approach: This paper relies on a structured review of the literature, using the bibliometric-systematic literature review (B-SLR) framework. Findings: Our analysis identifies four main clusters. This work indicates a one-sided engagement: most contributions come from sustainability studies, with limited input from negotiation scholars. Highlighting the absence of an integrative theoretical lens, we suggest that stakeholder theory could bridge the domains. The findings confirm that negotiation is a constitutive process through which sustainability goals are pursued, not merely an instrumental tool. Social implications: For sustainability to move from intention to reality, it must be negotiated. Effective negotiation is vital for firms dealing with internal demands, navigating diverse stakeholder expectations and implementing key initiatives like environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices. This study provides the crucial theoretical framework needed to analyse these processes, ensuring that ambitious sustainability goals are translated into credible, actionable and effective real-world results. Originality/value: Through our six propositions, the study advances a new understanding of how negotiation and sustainability intersect and mutually shape one another. These propositions reframe negotiation as a constitutive process rather than a transactional tool, linking micro-level interactions with macro-level sustainability outcomes and offering new conceptual directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghazal Layeghi & Adrian Borbély & Andrea Caputo, 2026. "Intersection of negotiation and sustainability in business: review and future research," Post-Print hal-05581311, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05581311
    DOI: 10.1108/MD-07-2025-2043
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05581311v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05581311v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/MD-07-2025-2043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Melanie Feeney & Therese Grohnert & Wim Gijselaers & Pim Martens, 2023. "Organizations, Learning, and Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 217-235, April.
    4. Colin Eden & Fran Ackermann, 2021. "Modelling Stakeholder Dynamics for Supporting Group Decision and Negotiation: Theory to Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1001-1025, October.
    5. Ding, Huiping & Zhao, Qilan & An, Zhirong & Tang, Ou, 2016. "Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 191-207.
    6. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    7. Henning Breuer & Florian Lüdeke-Freund, 2019. "Values-Based Stakeholder Management: Concepts and Methods," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Thomas Wunder (ed.), Rethinking Strategic Management, chapter 0, pages 217-239, Springer.
    8. Ortwin Renn & Birgit Blättel‐Mink & Hans Kastenholz, 1997. "Discursive methods in environmental decision making," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 218-231, September.
    9. Ding, Huiping & Zhao, Qilan & An, Zhirong & Xu, Jia & Liu, Qian, 2015. "Pricing strategy of environmental sustainable supply chain with internalizing externalities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 563-575.
    10. Robert B. Gibson, 2006. "Beyond The Pillars: Sustainability Assessment As A Framework For Effective Integration Of Social, Economic And Ecological Considerations In Significant Decision-Making," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 259-280.
    11. Kiril Ivanov, 2022. "Values-Based Business Model Innovation–The Case Of Ecosia And Its Business Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(05), pages 1-41, June.
    12. Robert C. Bird & Vivek Soundararajan, 2020. "The Role of Precontractual Signals in Creating Sustainable Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 81-94, June.
    13. Andrea Caputo & Mariya Kargina, 2022. "A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 82-88, March.
    14. Signe Pedersen & Christian Clausen & Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, 2023. "Navigating value networks to co‐create sustainable business models: An actionable staging approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 240-258, January.
    15. Adele Celino & Grazia Concilio, 2011. "Explorative Nature of Negotiation in Participatory Decision Making for Sustainability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 255-270, March.
    16. Adrian Borbély & Andrea Caputo, 2017. "Approaching Negotiation at the Organizational Level," Post-Print hal-03188181, HAL.
    17. Patricia Elgoibar & Elio Shijaku, 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    18. Robert Perey & Suzanne Benn & Renu Agarwal & Melissa Edwards, 2018. "The place of waste: Changing business value for the circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 631-642, July.
    19. Yosef Jabareen, 2008. "A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-192, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlie Karlsson & Björn Hammarfelt, 2025. "Correction: The growth and development of Nordic regional science research 1982–2022: bibliometric evidence from thirteen regional science journals," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-1, June.
    2. Horobet, Alexandra & Boubaker, Sabri & Belascu, Lucian & Negreanu, Cristina Carmencita & Dinca, Zeno, 2024. "Technology-driven advancements: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic trading literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Manta Eduard Mihai & Davidescu Adriana Ana Maria & Geambasu Maria Cristina & Florescu Margareta Stela, 2023. "Exploring the research area of direct taxation. An empirical analysis based on bibliometric analysis results," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 355-383, December.
    4. Hussain, Walayat & Merigó, José M. & Rahimi, Iman & Lev, Benjamin, 2025. "Half a century of Omega – The International Journal of Management Science: A bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    6. Sa Nguyen Tran & Dao Thi Thieu Ha, 2025. "Green banking disclosure: A bibliometric analysis," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(1), pages 20-37.
    7. Sandip Solanki & Seema Singh & Meeta Joshi, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy: 2013-2022," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 260-270, September.
    8. Mohammed R. M. Salem & Shahida Shahimi, 2025. "A comprehensive analysis of FinTech (1968–2025): a bibliometric approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Naduni Madhavika & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey & Balkrushna Potdar, 2026. "Modern Slavery Disclosure Practices: A Systematic Literature Review Using Bibliometric and Thematic Content Analyses," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 36-66, March.
    10. Martha Flores-Sosa & José M. Merigó & Kenia Sanchez-Valenzuela, 2025. "30 years of the Journal of Heuristics: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 1-55, March.
    11. Saurav Chandra Talukder & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Exploring the Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship and Crowdfunding: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    13. Tejaswi Patil & Zillur Rahman, 2023. "Mapping the Cause-Related Marketing (CRM) field: document co-citation and bibliographic coupling approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 491-520, June.
    14. Alexandra Horobet & Sabri Boubaker & Lucian Belascu & Cristina Carmencita Negreanu & Zeno Dinca, 2024. "Technology-driven advancements: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic trading literature," Post-Print hal-04990283, HAL.
    15. Pedro Borges & Mário Franco & Amélia Carvalho & Carlos Machado dos Santos & Margarida Rodrigues & Galvão Meirinhos & Rui Silva, 2022. "University-Industry Cooperation: A Peer-Reviewed Bibliometric Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Wei Wei & Xiaoling Huang & Shuai Zhang & Wanru Wang & Mengfei Liu, 2025. "Journal of Informetrics 2007–2023: A Retrospective Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    17. Yao, Ye & Du, Huibin & Zou, Hongyang & Zhou, Peng & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Neumann, Anne & Yeh, Sonia, 2023. "Fifty years of Energy Policy: A bibliometric overview," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Huichen Gao & Shijuan Wang, 2022. "The Intellectual Structure of Research on Rural-to-Urban Migrants: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Gary Eckstein & Anup Shrestha & Fiona Russo, 2025. "Thirty-five years of sensemaking in the business & management research: a bibliometric analysis, review and discussion," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3191-3217, December.
    20. Ricardo Rodrigues & Carlos Sampaio & Paulo Duarte & José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón, 2022. "Cross-Border Innovation: Assessing Concepts, Contexts, and Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05581311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.