IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05578404.html

Liquidity Constraints and Auditor Responses to Repo Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • J. Z. Zhang

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Repurchase agreements (repos) are often used by banks to manipulate their reported quarter-end risk levels. Prior research has documented adverse capital market consequences associated with active window dressing of repo liabilities. In this study, we investigate whether repos also affect auditors' risk assessments of client banks. Our study reveals that auditor reactions to repos are contingent on the client bank's liquidity constraints, rather than on the extent of repo transactions. Specifically, we find that downward quarter-end deviations in repo liabilities are not perceived by auditors as risky actions for banks with more liquidity. For banks with high liquidity risk exposure, however, we document a strong positive association between repo deviations and audit fees. Our findings suggest that auditors could utilise the contextual cue of liquidity constraints in their attempt to resolve ambiguity surrounding repo transactions, and accordingly charge higher fees for riskier clients. Our results persist for other types of auditor responses, including auditor changes and the issuance of going concern opinions.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Z. Zhang, 2026. "Liquidity Constraints and Auditor Responses to Repo Transactions," Post-Print hal-05578404, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05578404
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70036
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05578404v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05578404v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bidisha Chakrabarty & Gaiyan Zhang, 2012. "Credit Contagion Channels: Market Microstructure Evidence from Lehman Brothers’ Bankruptcy," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 320-343, June.
    2. Simunic, Da, 1980. "The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 161-190.
    3. Edward L. Owens & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2015. "Quarter-end repo borrowing dynamics and bank risk opacity," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1164-1209, September.
    4. Vladimir Atanasov & Bernard Black, 2021. "The Trouble with Instruments: The Need for Pretreatment Balance in Shock-Based Instrumental Variable Designs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1270-1302, February.
    5. Lennox, Clive S. & Park, Chul W., 2006. "The informativeness of earnings and management's issuance of earnings forecasts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 439-458, December.
    6. Loutskina, Elena, 2011. "The role of securitization in bank liquidity and funding management," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 663-684, June.
    7. Feng Guo & Chenxi Lin & Adi Masli & Michael S. Wilkins, 2021. "Auditor Responses to Shareholder Activism," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 63-95, March.
    8. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J, 1971. "Improved Forecasting Through the Design of Homogeneous Groups," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(4), pages 432-450, October.
    9. Chitru S. Fernando & Anthony D. May & William L. Megginson, 2012. "The Value of Investment Banking Relationships: Evidence from the Collapse of Lehman Brothers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(1), pages 235-270, February.
    10. Bassi, Claudio & Behn, Markus & Grill, Michael & Waibel, Martin, 2024. "Window dressing of regulatory metrics: Evidence from repo markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Erik L. Beardsley & Dennis R. Lassila & Thomas C. Omer, 2019. "How Do Audit Offices Respond to Audit Fee Pressure? Evidence of Increased Focus on Nonaudit Services and their Impact on Audit Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 999-1027, June.
    12. Markus Behn & Giacomo Mangiante & Laura Parisi & Michael Wedow, 2022. "Behind the Scenes of the Beauty Contest—Window Dressing and the G-SIB Framework," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 18(5), pages 1-42, December.
    13. Dimitris K. Chronopoulos & Lemonia M. Rempoutsika & John O. S. Wilson, 2024. "Audit committee oversight and bank financial reporting quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1-2), pages 657-687, January.
    14. Vladimir Kotomin & Drew Winters, 2006. "Quarter-End Effects in Banks: Preferred Habitat or Window Dressing?," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 29(1), pages 61-82, February.
    15. Panayiotis C. Andreou & Dennis Philip & Peter Robejsek, 2016. "Bank Liquidity Creation and Risk-Taking: Does Managerial Ability Matter?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1-2), pages 226-259, January.
    16. Allen, Linda & Saunders, Anthony, 1992. "Bank window dressing: Theory and evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 585-623, June.
    17. Fields, L. Paige & Fraser, Donald R. & Wilkins, Michael S., 2004. "An investigation of the pricing of audit services for financial institutions," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 53-77.
    18. Atanasov, Vladimir & Black, Bernard, 2016. "Shock-Based Causal Inference in Corporate Finance and Accounting Research," Critical Finance Review, now publishers, vol. 5(2), pages 207-304, December.
    19. Kim, Jaewoo, 2018. "Asymmetric timely loss recognition, adverse shocks to external capital, and underinvestment: Evidence from the collapse of the junk bond market," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 148-168.
    20. Du, Brian & Palia, Darius, 2018. "Short-Term Debt and Bank Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(2), pages 815-835, April.
    21. Liangliang Jiang & Mingming Ji, 2024. "Risk management committee and bank performance: Evidence from the adoption of the Dodd–Frank Act," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7-8), pages 1762-1788, July.
    22. Gorton, Gary & Metrick, Andrew, 2012. "Securitized banking and the run on repo," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 425-451.
    23. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bassi, Claudio & Behn, Markus & Grill, Michael & Waibel, Martin, 2024. "Window dressing of regulatory metrics: Evidence from repo markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Gorton, Gary & Metrick, Andrew & Xie, Lei, 2021. "The flight from maturity," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    3. Edward L. Owens & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2015. "Quarter-end repo borrowing dynamics and bank risk opacity," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1164-1209, September.
    4. Olbrich, Justus, 2025. "The effect of changes in internal control systems on audit risk," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(3), pages 657-676.
    5. Luis Garcia & Ulf Lewrick & Taja Sečnik, 2023. "Window Dressing and the Designation of Global Systemically Important Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 64(2), pages 231-264, October.
    6. Brian Du, 2020. "Securitized banking and interest rate sensitivity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 851-876, April.
    7. Benjamin Munyan, 2015. "Regulatory Arbitrage in Repo Markets," Working Papers 15-22, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    8. Chu, Ling & Simunic, Dan A. & Ye, Minlei & Zhang, Ping, 2018. "Transaction costs and competition among audit firms in local markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 129-147.
    9. Bank for International Settlements, 2024. "Banks' window-dressing of the G-SIB framework: causal evidence from a quantitative impact study," BCBS Working Papers 42, Bank for International Settlements.
    10. Bassi, Claudio & Behn, Markus & Grill, Michael & Waibel, Martin, 2023. "Window dressing of regulatory metrics: evidence from repo markets," Working Paper Series 2771, European Central Bank.
    11. Luis Garcia & Ulf Lewrick & Taja Sečnik, 2021. "Is window dressing by banks systemically important?," BIS Working Papers 960, Bank for International Settlements.
    12. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    13. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Kitto, Andrew R., 2024. "The effects of non-Big 4 mergers on audit efficiency and audit market competition☆," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1).
    15. Chen, Xiao & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Liu, Leo Jiahe, 2025. "Audit implications of major customer diversity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    16. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    17. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    18. Kotomin, Vladimir & Smith, Stanley D. & Winters, Drew B., 2008. "Preferred habitat for liquidity in international short-term interest rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 240-250, February.
    19. Battaglia, Francesca & Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella, 2021. "Securitization and crash risk: Evidence from large European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05578404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.