IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05531554.html

The decoupling of extra-financial materiality assessment practices : Study of cooperative and shareholder banks

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuelle Flores

    (CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UB - Université de Bourgogne - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE])

  • Véronique Blum

    (UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Materiality analyses seek to identify the significant information that needs to be further explored in communications with stakeholders (Beske et al., 2020). Information is considered material if its omission or inaccuracy can affect the economic, social and environmental decisions of users (Edgley, 2014), the link is significant with strategy, risk and long-term value creation (Cerbone et Maroun, 2020 ; Font et al., 2016). Materiality analyses has become a requirement with the adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD 2022/2464/EU). Hence, there should exist an alignment between the areas that are identified as areas where the reporting entity has impact and the content of the extra-financial disclosures. In what manner are the results of a materiality assessment and the entity's extra-financialdisclosures aligned ? To answer that question, we conduct a multiple case study, where we examine the extrafinancial disclosures and their practices within the framework of materiality analyses in a cooperative banking context, the « Banques Populaires » in France. We conduct a review ofmateriality practices through a panel of cooperative and shareholder banks. Our results highlight a typology of three different behaviors. « Decoupled » communication is observed when the companies declare that they are following the process but the evidence are not disclosed or remain laconic. « Discretionary » communication occurs when the banks have undertaken a materiality assessment process, but do not disclose in detail all the methodological aspects and/or do not implement all the steps of the analysis. Finally, « Proactive... but improvable » communication is observed when the banks present detailed methodologies in their reporting, but they remain an opacity testifying of a lack rigor and/or transparency on one or two aspects at most of the method adopted (selection of issues, panel, representativeness, etc.). We analyze our findings in the light of the conceptual framework of Neo-Institutional Theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuelle Flores & Véronique Blum, 2024. "The decoupling of extra-financial materiality assessment practices : Study of cooperative and shareholder banks," Post-Print hal-05531554, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05531554
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05531554v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05531554v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Font, Xavier & Guix, Mireia & Bonilla-Priego, Ma Jesús, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility in cruising: Using materiality analysis to create shared value," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 175-186.
    2. Roberto Aprile & David Alexander & Federica Doni, 2023. "Enhancing the materiality principle in integrated reporting by adopting the General Systems Theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2219-2233, September.
    3. Ghio, Alessandro & Verona, Roberto, 2022. "Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(4).
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570410567791 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2019. "La fabrique de la gouvernance dans les banques coopératives françaises," Post-Print halshs-03127830, HAL.
    6. Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Alkis Henri Otto & Tatjana Minulla, 2023. "Diverse Organizational Adoption of Institutions in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 1073-1088, April.
    7. Emmanuelle Reynaud & Aurélie Walas, 2015. "Discours sur la RSE dans le processus de légitimation de la banque," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(3), pages 187-209.
    8. Jérôme Caby & Éric Lamarque, 2019. "Peut-on parler de création de valeur sociétariale ?," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 141-155.
    9. Cerbone, Dannielle & Maroun, Warren, 2020. "Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    10. Edgley, Carla, 2014. "A genealogy of accounting materiality," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 255-271.
    11. Jérôme Caby & Eric Lamarque, 2019. "Peut-on parler de création de valeur sociétariale ?," Post-Print hal-02300878, HAL.
    12. Patrick de Cambourg & Charlotte Gardes, 2020. "La donnée extra-financière comme prérequis au développement d'une finance durable," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 193-208.
    13. Andreas Georg Scherer & Guido Palazzo, 2011. "The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 899-931, June.
    14. Cynthia E. Clark, 2021. "How do standard setters define materiality and why does it matter?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 378-391, July.
    15. Hervé Dumez & Élodie Gigout & Benoît Journé, 2013. "La visée externe et interne des dispositifs d' accountability . Une étude de cas," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(8), pages 171-180.
    16. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 118-138, January.
    17. Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2019. "La fabrique de la gouvernance dans les banques coopératives françaises : une approche centrée sociétaire," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 129-140.
    18. Carol A. Adams, 2004. "The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 731-757, December.
    19. Emmanuelle Reynaud & Walas Aurélie, 2015. "Discours sur la RSE dans le processus de légitimation de la banque," Post-Print hal-01538398, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamara Menichini & Gennaro Salierno & Nicoletta Maria Strollo, 2026. "Exploring the role of materiality analysis in corporate decision-making for SDG prioritization: A systematic literature review," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:tw6c7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jahmane, Abderrahmane & Gaies, Brahim, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, financial instability and corporate financial performance: Linear, non-linear and spillover effects – The case of the CAC 40 companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    5. Stefano Romito & Clodia Vurro, 2021. "Non‐financial disclosure and information asymmetry: A stakeholder view on US listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 595-605, March.
    6. Widarti Widarti & Desfitrina Desfitrina & Zulfadhli Zulfadhli, 2020. "Business Process Life Cycle Affects Company Financial Performance: Micro, Small, and Medium Business Enterprises During The Covid-19 Period," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 211-219.
    7. Benoit Jamet & Julien Bousquet, 2022. "Financement des filières fossiles et informations sociétale et environnementale : le secteur bancaire en quête de légitimité," Post-Print hal-03889444, HAL.
    8. Jittima Wichianrak & Tehmina Khan & David Teh & Steven Dellaportas, 2023. "Critical Perspectives of NGOs on Voluntary Corporate Environmental Reporting: Thai Public Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Antonio Costantini, 2020. "Materiality in integrated and sustainability reporting: A paradigm shift?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 306-320, January.
    10. Roberto Aprile & David Alexander & Federica Doni, 2023. "Enhancing the materiality principle in integrated reporting by adopting the General Systems Theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2219-2233, September.
    11. Leidy Katerine Rojas Molina & José Ángel Pérez López & María Soledad Campos Lucena, 2023. "Meta-analysis: associated factors for the adoption and disclosure of CSR practices in the banking sector," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1017-1044, September.
    12. Thomas Roulet, 2019. "Les Evaluations Sociales en Stratégie : Légitimité, Réputation, Statut, Stigmate et Cie," Post-Print hal-01970557, HAL.
    13. Prabhir Poruthiyil, 2013. "Weaning Business Ethics from Strategic Economism: The Development Ethics Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 735-749, September.
    14. repec:jpe:journl:1420 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Kelly Gerard, 2023. "Doing aid chains differently: Evaluating the potential of Multi‐Stakeholder Partnerships," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    16. Bianca Alves Almeida Machado & Lívia Cristina Pinto Dias & Alberto Fonseca, 2021. "Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI‐based sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 570-580, March.
    17. Thomas Maak & Nicola M. Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 463-493, May.
    18. Lindsey M. Bier & Candace L. White, 2021. "Cultural diplomacy as corporate strategy: an analysis of Pasona Group’s “New Tohoku” program in Japan," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 180-192, June.
    19. Estévez-Mendoza, Carlos & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Josep M. Lozano, 2022. "From Business Ethics to Business Education: Peter-Hans Kolvenbach’s Contribution," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 135-156, April.
    21. Bianchi, Lara & Passetti, Emilio & Contrafatto, Massimo, 2025. "The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(6).
    22. Nadia Zahoor & Huda Khan & Zaheer Khan & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2024. "Responsible innovation in emerging markets’ SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1175-1209, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05531554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.