IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6195-d1115630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Perspectives of NGOs on Voluntary Corporate Environmental Reporting: Thai Public Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Jittima Wichianrak

    (Hat Yai Campus, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand)

  • Tehmina Khan

    (School of Accounting, Information Systems and Supply Chain, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • David Teh

    (College of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Steven Dellaportas

    (International Business School Suzhou (IBSS), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215000, China)

Abstract

This study examines the nature of environmental disclosures of Thai public listed companies (PLCs) which operate in environmentally sensitive industries and the factors affecting environmental disclosures as well as the need for a critical perspective from Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) on corporate environmental reporting. A semi-structured interview approach was used for 19 interviews to attain critical perspectives of NGOs on environmental reporting. Thematic analysis through the lens of legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory is undertaken to identify themes and patterns that emerged from the study. Findings of this study reveal that the lack of quantity and quality when it comes to corporate environmental reports are serious issues, thus activating civil society’s criticism. Quality issues are dominant for the lack of reliance on voluntary environmental reporting by NGOs. The government’s monitoring and regulatory compliance systems is key, which has been highlighted as another factor. NGOs prefer government information over environmental information reported by companies. There is strong support for third-party verification and assurance to make the reports more reliable and useful. This study adds to the environmental disclosures and reporting literature by providing insights into civil society perspectives on corporate environmental reporting in the context of a developing country—Thailand. It sheds light on how companies can improve their stakeholder management and engagement strategy. It provides recommendations which may be used to inform relevant policy makers in improving Thai disclosure regulation and compliance mechanisms to promote greater monitoring and accountability. It also suggests companies further explore and examine potential technologies to support their reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jittima Wichianrak & Tehmina Khan & David Teh & Steven Dellaportas, 2023. "Critical Perspectives of NGOs on Voluntary Corporate Environmental Reporting: Thai Public Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6195-:d:1115630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Gray & Reza Kouhy & Simon Lavers, 1995. "Corporate social and environmental reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 47-77, May.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2016-2468 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dent, Jeremy F., 1991. "Accounting and organizational cultures: A field study of the emergence of a new organizational reality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 705-732.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2013-1439 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Deegan, Craig & Islam, Muhammad Azizul, 2014. "An exploration of NGO and media efforts to influence workplace practices and associated accountability within global supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 397-415.
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570210435861 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam & Elizabeth Monk & Clare Roberts, 2006. "The emancipatory potential of online reporting: The case of counter accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(5), pages 681-718, September.
    8. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-06-2013-1380 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Khosroshahi, Hossein & Azad, Nader & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Verma, Manish, 2021. "Investigating the level and quality of the information in the environmental disclosure report of a corporation considering government intervention," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Rob Gray & Jan Bebbington & David Collison, 2006. "NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 319-348, May.
    11. David Teh & Tehmina Khan & Brian Corbitt & Chin Eang Ong, 2020. "Sustainability strategy and blockchain-enabled life cycle assessment: a focus on materials industry," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 605-622, December.
    12. Muhammad Islam & Craig Deegan, 2010. "Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: A study of two global clothing and sports retail companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 131-148.
    13. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579510146996 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Oana Mihaela Apostol, 2015. "A project for Romania? The role of the civil society’s counter-accounts in facilitating democratic change in society," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 210-241, February.
    15. Sarah George Lauwo & Olatunde Julius Otusanya & Owolabi Bakre, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in the mining sector of Tanzania," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 1038-1074, August.
    16. Florence Depoers & Thomas Jeanjean & Tiphaine Jérôme, 2016. "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 445-461, March.
    17. Rob Gray & Jan Bebbington & David Collison, 2006. "NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(3), pages 319-348, April.
    18. Mahmood Ahmed Momin, 2013. "Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosures: The Case of Bangladesh," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 150-161, June.
    19. Andreas Georg Scherer & Guido Palazzo, 2011. "The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 899-931, June.
    20. de Villiers, Charl & van Staden, Chris J., 2006. "Can less environmental disclosure have a legitimising effect? Evidence from Africa," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 763-781, November.
    21. Cecília Carmo & Mercedes Miguéis, 2022. "Voluntary Sustainability Disclosures in Non-Listed Companies: An Exploratory Study on Motives and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    22. Ian Thomson & Colin Dey & Shona Russell, 2015. "Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(5), pages 809-845, June.
    23. A. M. Chijoke-Mgbame, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the UK," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Current Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, edition 1, pages 399-417, Springer.
    24. Carol A. Adams & Carlos Larrinaga‐González, 2007. "Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 333-355, June.
    25. Glyn M. Rimmington & Mara Alagic, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility: ThirdPlaceLearning for Absorbing Diverse Perspectives," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Katrin Hansen & Cathrine Seierstad (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility and Diversity Management, pages 269-288, Springer.
    26. Julian F. Kölbel & Timo Busch & Leonhardt M. Jancso, 2017. "How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 2266-2284, November.
    27. Cheng-Li Huang & Fan-Hua Kung, 2010. "Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 435-451, October.
    28. Brendan O'Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman & John Bradley, 2005. "Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 14-43, February.
    29. Oana Mihaela Apostol, 2015. "A project for Romania? The role of the civil society’s counter-accounts in facilitating democratic change in society," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 210-241, February.
    30. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2012-01057 is not listed on IDEAS
    31. Dayuan Li & Min Huang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Lutao Ning, 2018. "Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1089-1104, July.
    32. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-01-2015-1942 is not listed on IDEAS
    33. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570410567791 is not listed on IDEAS
    34. Noel Brown & Craig Deegan, 1998. "The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 21-41.
    35. Mercy Denedo & Ian Thomson & Akira Yonekura, 2017. "International advocacy NGOs, counter accounting, accountability and engagement," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 1309-1343, August.
    36. Muttanachai Suttipun, 2021. "The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(4), pages 391-402, December.
    37. Momin, Mahmood Ahmed, 2013. "Social and environmental NGOs’ perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosures: The Case of Bangladesh," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 150-161.
    38. Nongnooch Kuasirikun & Michael Sherer, 2004. "Corporate social accounting disclosure in Thailand," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(4), pages 629-660, September.
    39. Florence Depoers & Thomas Jeanjean & Tiphaine Jerome, 2016. "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports," Post-Print hal-01735774, HAL.
    40. Xiaojun Du & Fei Feng & Wei Lv, 2022. "Bibliometric Overview of Organizational Legitimacy Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    41. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570410554588 is not listed on IDEAS
    42. Carol A. Adams & Carlos Larrinaga‐González, 2007. "Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 333-355, June.
    43. Hildy Teegen & Jonathan P Doh & Sushil Vachani, 2004. "The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(6), pages 463-483, November.
    44. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    45. Carol Adams & Ambika Zutshi, 2004. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Business Should Act Responsibly and Be Accountable," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(34), pages 31-39, November.
    46. Sonja Gallhofer & Jim Haslam & Elizabeth Monk & Clare Roberts, 2006. "The emancipatory potential of online reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(5), pages 681-718, September.
    47. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570710748535 is not listed on IDEAS
    48. Brendan O'Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman & Elaine Hession, 2005. "User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 759-787.
    49. Niloufar Fallah Shayan & Nasrin Mohabbati-Kalejahi & Sepideh Alavi & Mohammad Ali Zahed, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    50. Craig Deegan & Michaela Rankin & John Tobin, 2002. "An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 312-343, August.
    51. Helen Tregidga, 2017. "“Speaking truth to power”: analysing shadow reporting as a form of shadow accounting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 510-533, March.
    52. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570610689668 is not listed on IDEAS
    53. David J. Cooper & Wayne Morgan, 2013. "Meeting the evolving corporate reporting needs of government and society: arguments for a deliberative approach to accounting rule making," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 418-441, August.
    54. Ian Thomson & Colin Dey & Shona Russell, 2015. "Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(5), pages 809-845, June.
    55. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570510584647 is not listed on IDEAS
    56. Waris Ali & Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Zubair Ahmad & Zeeshan Mahmood & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "The Relationship between Social Visibility and CSR Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, March.
    57. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570610670325 is not listed on IDEAS
    58. Phattraporn Soytong & Ranjith Perera, 2017. "Spatial analysis of the environmental conflict between state, society and industry at the Map Ta Phut-Rayong conurbation in Thailand," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 839-862, June.
    59. Spence, Crawford, 2009. "Social accounting's emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 205-227.
    60. Carol A. Adams, 2004. "The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 731-757, December.
    61. Magdalena Ziolo & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Cheba, 2019. "How to Design More Sustainable Financial Systems: The Roles of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in the Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-34, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George, Sendirella & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse, 2023. "Social movement activists’ conceptions of political action and counter-accounting through a critical dialogic accounting and accountability lens," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Pazzi, Silvia & Svetlova, Ekaterina, 2023. "NGOs, public accountability, and critical accounting education: Making data speak," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Stacchezzini, Riccardo & Masiero, Eleonora & Lai, Alessandro, 2023. "Histories as counter-accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Deegan, Craig & Haque, Shamima, 2021. "Corporate human rights performance and moral power: A study of retail MNCs’ supply chains in Bangladesh," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Martinez, Daniel & Himick, Darlene, 2023. "Accounting in (direct) action: Prefiguring emancipation in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Osman, Mohamed & Gallhofer, Sonja & Haslam, Jim, 2021. "Contextualising and critically theorising corporate social responsibility reporting: Dynamics of the late Mubarak Era in Egypt," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Brown, Judy & Tregidga, Helen, 2017. "Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through Rancière: On the value of dissensus," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-21.
    8. Andrew, Jane & Baker, Max, 2020. "The radical potential of leaks in the shadow accounting project: The case of US oil interests in Nigeria," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Jane Andrew & Max Baker, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: The Last 40 Years and a Path to Sharing Future Insights," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(1), pages 35-65, March.
    10. Moazzem Hossain & Angela Hecimovic & Aklema Choudhury Lema, 2015. "Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Reporting Practices from an Emerging Mobile Telecommunications Market," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(4), pages 389-404, December.
    11. Tzu-Kuan Chiu & Yi-Hsin Wang, 2015. "Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 379-398, June.
    12. Vinnari, Eija & Laine, Matias, 2017. "The moral mechanism of counter accounts: The case of industrial animal production," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-17.
    13. Haque Shamima & Islam Muhammad Azizul, 2015. "Stakeholder pressures on corporate climate change-related accountability and disclosures: Australian evidence," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 355-390, August.
    14. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    15. Belal, Ataur Rahman & Cooper, Stuart M. & Roberts, Robin W., 2013. "Vulnerable and exploitable: The need for organisational accountability and transparency in emerging and less developed economies," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 81-91.
    16. Die Wu & Shuzhen Zhu & Aftab Ahmed Memon & Hafeezullah Memon, 2020. "Financial Attributes, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Tregidga, Helen & Milne, Markus J., 2022. "Not at our table: Stakeholder exclusion and ant/agonistic engagements," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Perkiss, Stephanie & Bernardi, Cristiana & Dumay, John & Haslam, Jim, 2021. "A sticky chocolate problem: Impression management and counter accounts in the shaping of corporate image," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Ruff, Katherine, 2022. "In support of making up users," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Lauwo, Sarah & Otusanya, Olatunde Julius, 2014. "Corporate accountability and human rights disclosures: A case study of Barrick Gold Mine in Tanzania," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 91-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6195-:d:1115630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.