IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05411228.html

Scarcity, absorptive capacity, and social networking — Antecedents of self-constructed innovation in Vietnamese SMEs?

Author

Listed:
  • Son Thi Kim Le
  • Laurent Scaringella

    (Rennes SB - Rennes School of Business)

Abstract

Literature on innovation has identified specific innovation patterns under scarcity conditions. This research investigates organizational and business environment factors that could be predictors of Jugaad-driven innovation to gain insight into the mechanisms of how resourceconstrained firms can innovate following an informally recognized innovation paradigm. In particular, we explore the drivers of self-constructed innovation-a form of Jugaad-driven innovation among small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in resource-constrained environments in developing countries. Using quantitative analysis of 2929 Vietnamese SMEs, we investigate how resource scarcities, social networking, and absorptive capacity influence the emergence of self-constructed innovation. Our findings reveal that weak infrastructure plays a significant role in triggering self-constructed innovation, whereas capital and human resource constraints do not show a significant effect. Additionally, we find that strong social networking and higher absorptive capacity enhance SMEs' ability to access external knowledge and develop selfconstructed innovations. The study also highlights that self-constructed innovation primarily emerges as a cost-effective, non-R&D alternative for firms facing resource limitations, reinforcing its strong connection with bricolage and frugal innovation. By examining the combined influence of external knowledge sources and internal capabilities, this study contributes to the literature on non-R&D innovation management, in particular Jugaad innovation and responds to the call for further research on innovation networks in developing economies. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and managers seeking to support SME innovation under resource constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Son Thi Kim Le & Laurent Scaringella, 2025. "Scarcity, absorptive capacity, and social networking — Antecedents of self-constructed innovation in Vietnamese SMEs?," Post-Print hal-05411228, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05411228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijis.2025.07.001
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05411228v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05411228v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Ananthram & C. Chan, 2021. "Institutions and frugal innovation: The case of Jugaad," Post-Print hal-03336967, HAL.
    2. Pierre Blanchard & Jean-Pierre Huiban & Antonio Musolesi & Patrick Sevestre, 2013. "Where there is a will, there is a way? Assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(3), pages 679-710, June.
    3. Omid Aliasghar & Arash Sadeghi & Elizabeth L. Rose, 2023. "Process innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: The critical roles of external knowledge sourcing and absorptive capacity," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(4), pages 1583-1610, July.
    4. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 13-41.
    5. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Post-Print hal-02985953, HAL.
    6. Roud, Vitaliy, 2018. "Understanding the heterogeneity of innovation modes: Performance effects, barriers, and demand for state support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 238-253.
    7. Jaideep Prabhu & Sanjay Jain, 2015. "Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 843-868, December.
    8. Maria Luisa Mancusi & Andrea Vezzulli, 2014. "R&D AND CREDIT RATIONING IN SMEs," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 1153-1172, July.
    9. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
    10. Sun, Yuan & Cao, Haiyang & Tan, Barney & Shang, Rong-An, 2016. "Developing Frugal IS Innovations: Applied insights from Weqia.com," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1260-1264.
    11. Pablo D'Este & Francesco Rentocchini & Jaider Vega-Jurado, 2014. "The Role of Human Capital in Lowering the Barriers to Engaging in Innovation: Evidence from the Spanish Innovation Survey," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Islam, Md. Mazharul & Habes, Essam M. & Alam, Md. Mahmudul, 2018. "The usage and social capital of mobile phones and their effect on the performance of microenterprise: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 156-164.
    13. Galia, Fabrice & Legros, Diego, 2004. "Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1185-1199, October.
    14. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Francisca Sempere-Ripoll & Carles Boronat-Moll & Sofia Estelles-Miguel, 2020. "SME open innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicated external knowledge sourcing," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 409-445, March.
    15. Subramaniam Ananthram & Christopher Chan, 2021. "Institutions and frugal innovation: The case of Jugaad," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1031-1060, September.
    16. Christian Rammer & Dirk Czarnitzki & Alfred Spielkamp, 2009. "Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-58, June.
    17. Zeting Liu & Blandine Laperche, 2015. "The knowledge capital of SMEs: The French paradox," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 27-48.
    18. Mikko Moilanen & Stein Østbye & Kristin Woll, 2014. "Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 447-462, August.
    19. Garud, Raghu & Karnoe, Peter, 2003. "Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 277-300, February.
    20. André Spithoven & Wim Vanhaverbeke & Nadine Roijakkers, 2013. "Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 537-562, October.
    21. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    22. Tobias Buchmann & Alexander Haering & Muhamed Kudic & Michael Rothgang, 2024. "Overcoming Innovation Barriers along the Automotive Industry Value Chain – A Framed Experiment," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 191-222.
    23. Giacomo Zanello & Xiaolan Fu & Pierre Mohnen & Marc Ventresca, 2016. "The Creation And Diffusion Of Innovation In Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 884-912, December.
    24. Audretsch, David B. & Belitski, Maksim, 2020. "The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    25. Alfonso Miranda & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2006. "Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 6(3), pages 285-308, September.
    26. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Savona, Maria, 2017. "No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 510-521.
    27. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Francisca Sempere-Ripoll & Carles Boronat-Moll, 2014. "Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 873-886, December.
    28. MariaLaura Di Domenico & Helen Haugh & Paul Tracey, 2010. "Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 681-703, July.
    29. Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar, 2020. "Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    30. Iizuka, Michiko & Hollanders, Hugo, 2017. "The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries," MERIT Working Papers 2017-032, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    31. Hernández-Barahona, Jorge & San Román, Elena & Gil-López, Águeda, 2023. "Bricolage and Innovation in the Emergence and Development of the Spanish Tourism Industry," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 1119-1161, December.
    32. Rameshwar Dubey & Vandana Sonwaney & Padmanabha Aital & V.G. Venkatesh & Sadia Samar Ali, 2015. "Antecedents of innovation and contextual relationship," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14.
    33. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    34. Müller, Julian M. & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2021. "The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 333-343.
    35. Arza, Valeria & López, Emanuel, 2021. "Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: Quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    36. de-Oliveira, Fernando & Rodil-Marzábal, Óscar, 2019. "Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 306-314.
    37. Sophie Mignon & Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Marc Robert & Joel West, 2020. "Managerial Innovation and Management of Open Innovation," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 3-12.
    38. Bianchi, Carlos & Bianco, Mariela & Ardanche, Melissa & Schenck, Marcela, 2017. "Healthcare frugal innovation: A solving problem rationale under scarcity conditions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 74-80.
    39. Bruno Cassiman & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2006. "In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R& D and External Knowledge Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 68-82, January.
    40. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2021. "Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    41. Hullova, Dusana & Trott, Paul & Simms, Christopher Don, 2016. "Uncovering the reciprocal complementarity between product and process innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 929-940.
    42. D’Este, Pablo & Iammarino, Simona & Savona, Maria & von Tunzelmann, Nick, 2012. "What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 482-488.
    43. Keupp, Marcus Matthias & Gassmann, Oliver, 2013. "Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1457-1468.
    44. Pansera, Mario & Owen, Richard, 2015. "Framing resource-constrained innovation at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: Insights from an ethnographic case study in rural Bangladesh," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 300-311.
    45. Khan, Muhammad Salar, 2022. "Absorptive capacities and economic growth in low- and middle-income economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 156-188.
    46. Dean A. Shepherd & Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2020. "The Surprising Duality of Jugaad: Low Firm Growth and High Inclusive Growth," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 87-128, January.
    47. Chudnovsky, Daniel & Lopez, Andres & Pupato, German, 2006. "Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms' behavior (1992-2001)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 266-288, March.
    48. Giacomo Ciambotti & Matteo Pedrini, 2021. "Hybrid Harvesting Strategies to Overcome Resource Constraints: Evidence from Social Enterprises in Kenya," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 631-650, January.
    49. Rui Torres de Oliveira & Simona Gentile-Lüdecke & Sandra Figueira, 2022. "Barriers to innovation and innovation performance: the mediating role of external knowledge search in emerging economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1953-1974, April.
    50. Sophie Mignon & Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Marc Robert & Joel West, 2020. "Managerial Innovation and Management of Open Innovation," Post-Print hal-03037869, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arza, Valeria & López, Emanuel, 2021. "Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: Quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    2. de-Oliveira, Fernando & Rodil-Marzábal, Óscar, 2019. "Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 306-314.
    3. Jaureguy, Micaela Vidal & Bianchi, Carlos & Blanchard, Pablo, 2023. "Financial and knowledge barriers to innovation: Complementary and substitution effects on innovative effort," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    4. Blind, Knut & Petersen, Sören S. & Riillo, Cesare A.F., 2017. "The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 249-264.
    5. Dragana Radicic, 2021. "Financial and Non-Financial Barriers to Innovation and the Degree of Radicalness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Castaneda, Monica & Herrera, Milton M. & Méndez-Morales, Alberto, 2023. "A simulation-based approach for assessing the innovation barriers in the manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "Financial constraints and intangible investments. Do innovative and non-innovative firms differ?," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2019-07, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Leoncini, Riccardo, 2016. "Learning-by-failing. An empirical exercise on CIS data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 376-386.
    9. Levan Bzhalava & Uwe Cantner, 2018. "The journey towards open innovation: why do firms choose different routes?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 245-265, September.
    10. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Savona, Maria, 2017. "No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 510-521.
    11. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera, 2022. "Determinants of financing constraints," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1427-1439, March.
    12. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Soufiane Kherrazi & Karim Saïd, 2022. "Managerial Practices Within Multilateral And Public-Funded R&D Collaborations," Post-Print hal-04205187, HAL.
    14. Duc Anh Nguyen & Liliana Mitkova, 2024. "Recent research trends in open innovation in SMEs: a bibliometric literature review," Post-Print hal-04712830, HAL.
    15. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2015. "Barriers to innovation: can firm age help lower them?," Working Papers 2015/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    16. Pablo D’Este & Alberto Marzucchi & Francesco Rentocchini, 2014. "Exploring and yet failing less: Learning from exploration, exploitation and human capital in R&D," SPRU Working Paper Series 2014-23, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. Mehak Majeed & Saeed Owais Mushtaq & Zahid Gulzar Rather, 2022. "The Complementarity Between the Formal and Informal Sub-sectors of the Indian Industry," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(4), pages 981-1006, December.
    18. Claudia Fuentes & Fernando Santiago & Serdal Temel, 2020. "Perception of innovation barriers by successful and unsuccessful innovators in emerging economies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1283-1307, August.
    19. Pavla Matulova & Petra Maresova & Mohammad Ali Tareq & Kamil Kuča, 2018. "Open Innovation Session as a Tool Supporting Innovativeness in Strategies for High-Tech Companies in the Czech Republic," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca & Boronat-Moll, Carles, 2021. "Technological innovation typologies and open innovation in SMEs: Beyond internal and external sources of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05411228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.