IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05361256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Reformulation Of The Concept Of Returns To Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Anselme Njocke

    (CATT - Centre d'Analyse Théorique et de Traitement des données économiques - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

We propose the gh-returns to scale concept which generalizes the traditional returns to scale concept. This new concept takes into account variations of all the inputs in unspecified proportions, in the evolution of production, contrary to the returns to scale concept which takes into account, only equiproportionate variations of all the inputs which lead to the implementation of production. It will appear that, when characterizing (or determining) the returns to scale (constant, increasing or decreasing), homogeneity of degree of a (production) function no longer plays the central role (except the traditional case where all the factors vary in the same proportions) it was once attributed as the nature of returns to scale can be evoked, with this new approach of unspecified variations of the proportions, whatever the degree of homogeneity of a (production) function. It will also appear that, if the producer wishes or if he is constrained to be located in a precise zone of the gh-returns to scale (for example, that of increasing gh-returns to scale, because of limited outlets or a badly filled order book), the change of its size or scale in the long run, (in case of an investment which requires capital deepening synonymous with the increase in the proportion of a factor (capital) to the detriment of the reduction in the proportion of another factor (labor)), should not be made in a hazardous way, but must rather obey specific conditions (or constraints) characterizing such a zone of the gh-returns to scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Anselme Njocke, 2017. "A Reformulation Of The Concept Of Returns To Scale," Post-Print hal-05361256, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05361256
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-05361256v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://univ-pau.hal.science/hal-05361256v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas, Paul H, 1976. "The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 903-915, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & de Pinho Matos, Giordano Bruno Braz, 2015. "Statistical evaluation of Data Envelopment Analysis versus COLS Cobb–Douglas benchmarking models for the 2011 Brazilian tariff revision," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 47-60.
    2. Xu, Xianghui & Chen, Yingshan & Zhou, Yan & Liu, Wuyuan & Zhang, Xinrui & Li, Mo, 2023. "Sustainable management of agricultural water rights trading under uncertainty: An optimization-evaluation framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Jean Pierre Namahoro & Wu Qiaosheng & Deyun Wang, 2025. "Mineral rents, renewable energy, and real growth nexus: evidence from top-rich countries in minerals across East-Central African regions," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 38(2), pages 359-375, June.
    4. Julien Forder & Florin Vadean & Stacey Rand & Juliette Malley, 2018. "The impact of long‐term care on quality of life," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 43-58, March.
    5. Montresor, Sandro & Vezzani, Antonio, 2015. "The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 381-393.
    6. Roman G. Smirnov & Kunpeng Wang, 2019. "The Cobb-Douglas production function revisited," Papers 1910.06739, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    7. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Rieger, Laszlo & Quiroga, Ricardo E., "undated". "Fixed Effects and Stochastic Frontier Estimates of Firm-Level Technical Efficiency," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270867, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Nie, Pu-yan & Yang, Yong-cong, 2016. "Effects of energy price fluctuations on industries with energy inputs: An application to China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 329-334.
    9. Fakhri J. Hasanov & Jeyhun I. Mikayilov & Sabuhi Yusifov & Khatai Aliyev & Samra Talishinskaya, 2019. "The role of social and physical infrastructure spending in tradable and non-tradable growth," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 13(1), March.
    10. Oryani, Bahareh & Koo, Yoonmo & Rezania, Shahabaldin & Shafiee, Afsaneh, 2021. "Investigating the asymmetric impact of energy consumption on reshaping future energy policy and economic growth in Iran using extended Cobb-Douglas production function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Jesus Felipe & F. Gerard Adams, 2005. ""A Theory of Production" The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 427-445, Summer.
    12. Fang, Yinhai & Xu, Haiyan & Perc, Matjaž & Tan, Qingmei, 2019. "Dynamic evolution of economic networks under the influence of mergers and divestitures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 89-99.
    13. Chi, Wei & Qian, Xiaoye, 2013. "Regional disparity of labor's share in China: Evidence and explanation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 277-293.
    14. Kolodinsky, Jane M. & Wang, Qingbin & Pelch, Leslie, 1999. "Community Supported Agriculture (Csa): A Hypothesis Test Of Membership Activities And Utility," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21692, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Bert M. Balk, 2024. "Why is the Cobb-Douglas production function so popular?," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Ferris, Stephen P. & Hanousek, Jan & Tresl, Jiri, 2021. "Corporate profitability and the global persistence of corruption," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Zhao, Xiaobing & Du, Ding & Xiong, Jun & Springer, Abraham & Masek Lopez, Sharon R. & Winkler, Blake & Hubler, Kenedy, 2019. "The impact of forest restoration on agriculture in the Verde River watershed, Arizona, USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Dale W. Jorgenson, 1991. "Productivity and Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, pages 19-118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Zefeng Mi & Zhixin Qiu & Gang Zeng & Can Zhou & Lei Ye, 2023. "The innovation effect of low‐carbon technology transfer from the perspective of carbon emission reduction demand: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 625-648, June.
    20. Jesus Felipe & Franklin M. Fisher, 2003. "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 208-262, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05361256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.