IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05333604.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Techno‐eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation

Author

Listed:
  • Monideepa Tarafdar

    (UMass Amherst - University of Massachusetts [Amherst] - UMASS - University of Massachusetts System)

  • Jean‐françois Stich

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine, ICN Business School)

  • Christian Maier

    (University of Bamberg)

  • Sven Laumer

    (FAU - Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg = University of Erlangen-Nuremberg)

Abstract

Technostress is an inevitable part of work life. This paper takes a step toward mastering it by focusing on positive stress that Information Systems (IS) creates for IS users, known as techno‐eustress. Factors that create techno‐eustress are known as techno‐eustress creators, which we conceptualise as cognitions experienced by IS users, that IS positively challenges and motivates them to enhance their work. They are important to study because they represent foundational opportunities for professional achievement and growth emanating from IS use. Drawing from theories of psychological eustress, self‐determination and proactive work, this paper theorises and validates an instrument to measure techno‐eustress creators. We establish the construct's validity and examine its nomological relationships based on data collected from working professionals who used IT for their work. We draw on data from two qualitative studies ( N = 35) and three quantitative surveys ( N = 980) conducted at different points in time. We validate techno‐eustress creators as a second‐order reflective construct having four dimensions: techno‐mastery, techno‐autonomy, techno‐enrichment and techno‐relatedness. We examine its nomological relationships with factors that create techno‐distress, IT strain, and user satisfaction. We contribute to the literature by theorising and validating four ways in which IS users are challenged and motivated by IS to enhance their work. We inform to managerial practice by drawing attention to how organisations can strengthen the different ways employees experience the creators of the ‘good' stress that use of IS generates.

Suggested Citation

  • Monideepa Tarafdar & Jean‐françois Stich & Christian Maier & Sven Laumer, 2024. "Techno‐eustress creators: Conceptualization and empirical validation," Post-Print hal-05333604, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05333604
    DOI: 10.1111/isj.12515
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05333604v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05333604v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/isj.12515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    3. Davenport, Thomas H., 2018. "The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262039176, December.
    4. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    5. Cram, W. Alec & Wiener, Martin & Tarafdar, Monideepa & Benlian, Alexander, 2022. "Examining the Impact of Algorithmic Control on Uber Drivers’ Technostress," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130811, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    6. Wm. David Salisbury & Wynne W. Chin & Abhijit Gopal & Peter R. Newsted, 2002. "Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement—Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 91-103, March.
    7. Han Li & Ashish Gupta & Xin Luo & Merrill Warkentin, 2011. "Exploring the impact of instant messaging on subjective task complexity and user satisfaction," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 139-155, March.
    8. Ofir Turel, 2015. "Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: a theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 431-446, July.
    9. Ronald T. Cenfetelli & Andrew Schwarz, 2011. "Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 808-823, December.
    10. Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "A Daily Field Investigation of Technology-Driven Stress Spillovers from Work to Home," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 113238, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Paul M. Leonardi, 2018. "Social Media and the Development of Shared Cognition: The Roles of Network Expansion, Content Integration, and Triggered Recalling," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 547-568, August.
    12. Edwards, Jeffrey R. & Cooper, Cary L., 1988. "The impacts of positive psychological states on physical health: A review and theoretical framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1447-1459, January.
    13. Greta L Polites & Nicholas Roberts & Jason Thatcher, 2012. "Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: a review and guidelines for their use," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 22-48, January.
    14. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    15. Ping Zhang & Gisela M. von Dran, 2000. "Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two‐factor model for website design and evaluation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(14), pages 1253-1268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Jakob Wirth & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 489-514, June.
    2. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    3. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    4. Viete, Steffen & Erdsiek, Daniel, 2018. "Trust-based work time and the productivity effects of mobile information technologies in the workplace," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Ae-Ri Lee, 2021. "Investigating the Personalization–Privacy Paradox in Internet of Things (IoT) Based on Dual-Factor Theory: Moderating Effects of Type of IoT Service and User Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Stefan Schweikl & Robert Obermaier, 2023. "Lost in translation: IT business value research and resource complementarity—an integrative framework, shortcomings and future research directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1713-1749, December.
    7. Khedhaouria, Anis & Montani, Francesco & Jamal, Arshad & Hussain Shah, Mahmood, 2024. "Consequences of technostress for users in remote (home) work contexts during a time of crisis: The buffering role of emotional social support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03026903, HAL.
    9. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    10. Zhen Shao & Lin Zhang & Tian Meng & Jing Zhang, 2024. "The paradox of technology quality and ethical concerns in building trust and behavioral intention in the AI-enabled face recognition payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Stany Wee Lian Fong & Hishamuddin bin Ismail & Tan Pei Kian, 2023. "Reflective-Formative Hierarchical Component Model for Characteristic-Adoption Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    12. Sun, Jonghak & Teng, James T.C., 2017. "The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 400-416.
    13. Sebastian Köffer & Kevin Ortbach & Iris Junglas & Björn Niehaves & Jeanne Harris, 2015. "Innovation Through BYOD?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(6), pages 363-375, December.
    14. Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary L Cooper & Jean‐françois Stich, 2018. "The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research," Post-Print hal-01689038, HAL.
    15. Nathalie Greenan & Silvia Napolitano, 2021. "Why Do Employees Participate in Innovation? Skills and Organisational Design Issues and the Ongoing Technological Transformation," Working Papers halshs-03270141, HAL.
    16. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Damon E. Campbell & John D. Wells & Joseph S. Valacich, 2013. "Breaking the Ice in B2C Relationships: Understanding Pre-Adoption E-Commerce Attraction," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 219-238, June.
    18. Jean-Charles Pillet & Kevin Carillo & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni, 2020. "What Does It Do? Theorizing Functional Ambiguity As A Factor Influencing User Perceptions Of Information Technology," Post-Print hal-03026903, HAL.
    19. Christoph Weinert & Tim Weitzel, 2023. "Teleworking in the Covid-19 Pandemic," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 309-328, June.
    20. Roy, Sanjit K. & Singh, Gaganpreet & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Shabnam, Saadia & Japutra, Arnold & van Doorn, Sebastian & Ray, Subhasis & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2024. "Smart service value: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation in the retailing context," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05333604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.