IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05215286.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Territorial marketing and branding: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Yahya Hassine

    (UIT - Université Ibn Tofaïl)

  • Kaoutar Alhaderi

    (UIT - Université Ibn Tofaïl)

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic review of territorial marketing and branding literature, focusing on the role of digital strategies in place promotion. Through a thorough analysis of articles from major databases like Scopus, Google Scholar, and we of science, we synthesize current knowledge on how digital tools, such as social media, enhance place branding. This paper presents a systematic literature review of territorial marketing and branding, with a particular focus on the role of digital strategies in enhancing the promotion and perception of places. By analyzing a diverse set of articles sourced from major academic databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, this study synthesizes current knowledge on how digital tools especially social media platforms and influencer marketing are transforming place branding practices. The findings reveal that digital ambassadors, influencers, and user-generated content (UGC) play a central role in shaping public perception, emotional connection, and engagement with territorial brands. Moreover, the results underscore the importance of digital storytelling, cultural adaptation of messages, and the emerging integration of technologies such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality in territorial marketing strategies. While most studies concentrate on well-known urban destinations, the review also sheds light on the challenges faced by smaller or rural territories in the digital landscape. Finally, this paper identifies significant research gaps and proposes directions for future investigations in the field of digital territorial branding.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahya Hassine & Kaoutar Alhaderi, 2025. "Territorial marketing and branding: A systematic literature review," Post-Print hal-05215286, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05215286
    DOI: 10.71420/ijref.v2i7.151
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05215286v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05215286v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.71420/ijref.v2i7.151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05215286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.