IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04367651.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can quantified-self change urban mobility behaviour? The importance of information presentation
[Le quantified-self peut-il changer les comportements de mobilité urbaine ? De l'importance de la présentation de l'information]

Author

Listed:
  • Ulysse Soulat

    (NUDD - Usages du Numérique pour le Développement Durable - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

  • Jeanne Lallement

    (NUDD - Usages du Numérique pour le Développement Durable - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

This research focuses on how quantified-self can change users' everyday urban mobility behaviour. As part of an exploratory approach, we are analysing fifty-five individual interviews of a group of young daily smartphone users. Using framing theory, our results highlight the importance of the form in which self-quantified information is presented in the context of an application with an environmental dimension. The information CO2 of individual mobility has more impact if the benefits are presented simply and in small quantities (vs. complex), in the form of gains (vs. losses), whose scope is individual (rather than collective), favouring descriptive norms (over injunctive norms), with in a short-term (vs. long-term) perspective. In the context of the ecological transition, we suggest some avenues for managerial reflection, in particular on how practitioners can design a mobile application with an environmental focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulysse Soulat & Jeanne Lallement, 2023. "Can quantified-self change urban mobility behaviour? The importance of information presentation [Le quantified-self peut-il changer les comportements de mobilité urbaine ? De l'importance de la pré," Post-Print hal-04367651, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04367651
    DOI: 10.54695/ror.182.0039
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04367651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04367651/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.54695/ror.182.0039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiggle, Susan, 1994. "Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 491-503, December.
    2. Pierre Dubois & Paulo Albuquerque & Olivier Allais & Céline Bonnet & Patrice Bertail & Pierre Combris & Saadi Lahlou & Natalie Rigal & Bernard Ruffieux & Pierre Chandon, 2021. "Effects of front-of-pack labels on the nutritional quality of supermarket food purchases: evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 119-138, January.
    3. Sihem Dekhili & Laure Lavorata, 2020. "Marketing et développement durable : quels enjeux pour les marques et les consommateurs ? [Editorial]," Post-Print hal-03100800, HAL.
    4. Kusmanoff, Alexander M. & Hardy, Mathew J. & Fidler, Fiona & Maffey, Georgina & Raymond, Christopher & Reed, M.S. & Fitzsimons, James A. & Bekessy, Sarah A., 2016. "Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 124-128.
    5. Hartmann-Boyce, J. & Jebb, S.A. & Fletcher, B.R. & Aveyard, P., 2015. "Self-help for weight loss in overweight and obese adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(3), pages 43-57.
    6. Cesare Amatulli & Matteo Angelis & Alessandro M. Peluso & Isabella Soscia & Gianluigi Guido, 2019. "The Effect of Negative Message Framing on Green Consumption: An Investigation of the Role of Shame," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1111-1132, July.
    7. Alexa Spence & Wouter Poortinga & Nick Pidgeon, 2012. "The Psychological Distance of Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 957-972, June.
    8. Lydiane Nabec, 2017. "Améliorer les comportements alimentaires avec l’étiquetage nutritionnel : vers un agenda de recherche au service du Bien-être des consommateurs," Post-Print hal-04213410, HAL.
    9. Anne-Sophie Binninger & Isabelle Robert & Nacima Ourahmoune, 2014. "Étiquettes environnementales et consommation durable : des relations ambiguës en construction," Post-Print hal-04214086, HAL.
    10. Markus Giesler & Ela Veresiu, 2014. "Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 840-857.
    11. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1986. "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 251-278, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trisha R. Shrum, 2021. "The salience of future impacts and the willingness to pay for climate change mitigation: an experiment in intergenerational framing," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Á. Ní Choisdealbha & P. D. Lunn, 2020. "Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 699-722, December.
    3. Schikofsky, Jan & Dannewald, Till & Kowald, Matthias, 2020. "Exploring motivational mechanisms behind the intention to adopt mobility as a service (MaaS): Insights from Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 296-312.
    4. Srinath Jagannathan & Anupam Bawa & Rajnish Rai, 2020. "Narrative Worlds of Frugal Consumers: Unmasking Romanticized Spirituality to Reveal Responsibilization and De-politicization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 149-168, January.
    5. Ghaffari, Mahsa & Jafari, Aliakbar & Sandikci, Ozlem, 2019. "The role of mundane and subtle institutional work in market dynamics: A case of fashion clothing market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 434-442.
    6. Laetitia Mimoun & Lez Trujillo-Torres & Francesca Sobande, 2022. "Social Emotions and the Legitimation of the Fertility Technology Market [The Role of Emotions in Marketing]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(6), pages 1073-1095.
    7. Lehberger, Mira & Grüner, Sven, 2021. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for plants protected by beneficial insects – Evidence from two stated-choice experiments with different subject pools," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Giana M. Eckhardt & Susan Dobscha, 2019. "The Consumer Experience of Responsibilization: The Case of Panera Cares," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 651-663, October.
    9. Bernard Cova & Gerald Gaglio & Juliette Weber & Philippe Chanial, 2018. "Organizational Sensemaking of Non-ethical Consumer Behavior: Case Study of a French Mutual Insurance Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 783-799, April.
    10. Ulusoy, Ebru, 2016. "Experiential responsible consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 284-297.
    11. Janel Jett & Leigh Raymond, 2021. "Issue Framing and U.S. State Energy and Climate Policy Choice," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 278-299, May.
    12. Daly, Bonita A. & Schuler, Drue K., 1998. "Redefining a certified public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 549-567.
    13. Güth, W., 1997. "Boundedly Rational Decision Emergence -A General Perspective and Some Selective Illustrations-," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,29, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    14. Nicoletta Buratti & Francesco Derchi & Giorgia Profumo, 2015. "The blurred boundary between empowered and working consumers: insights from the winner taco case," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 133-156.
    15. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Freeman, Steven F., 1997. "Good decisions : reconciling human rationality, evolution, and ethics," Working papers WP 3962-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    17. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.
    18. Kumar, Alok, 2007. "Do the diversification choices of individual investors influence stock returns?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 362-390, November.
    19. Jensen, Robert & Lleras-Muney, Adriana, 2012. "Does staying in school (and not working) prevent teen smoking and drinking?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 644-657.
    20. Cristel Russell & Dale Russell & Jill Klein, 2011. "Ambivalence toward a country and consumers’ willingness to buy emblematic brands: The differential predictive validity of objective and subjective ambivalence measures on behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 357-371, November.
    21. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04367651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.