IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03584620.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fintech et seniors Sud-Coréens : Une étude des facteurs d'acceptation

Author

Listed:
  • Sa-Rang Um

    (Kyung Hee Université)

  • Hye-Ri Shin

    (Kyung Hee Université)

  • Young-Sun Kim

    (Kyung Hee Université)

  • Gurvan Branellec

    (BBS - Brest business school)

  • Ji-Yong Lee

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Cette recherche a pour but d'explorer les facteurs d'acceptation de la Fintech chez les seniors. Différents courants théoriques traitent les variables qui influencent l'acceptation des innovations technologiques. Le modèle choisi au niveau de cette étude est inspiré du modèle d'acceptation de la technologie (MAT ou, plus fréquemment, TAM pour Technology Acceptance Model). Notre modèle inclut les variables de l'utilité perçue, de la facilité d'utilisation, de l'accessibilité, du coût d'accès, de l'esprit d'innovation et de l'incertitude. La validation empirique du modèle a été réalisée à l'aide des méthodes d'équations structurelles sur un échantillon de 457 adultes coréens. Une analyse statistique a été réalisée par les logiciels SPSS 23.0 et AMOS 18. Nos résultats montrent que l'acceptation de la Fintech par les seniors est influencée par l'utilité perçue, la facilité d'utilisation, l'esprit d'innovation et l'incertitude. Toutefois, l'accessibilité et le coût d'accès n'ont pas une influence statistiquement significative sur l'intention d'utilisation de la Fintech. Cette étude a des implications pour les Fintech puisqu'elle peut leur permettre d'adapter leurs solutions à ce segment du marché voire de développer des produits adaptés à cette population (assurance vie en ligne, solutions de gestion de patrimoine et de succession…).

Suggested Citation

  • Sa-Rang Um & Hye-Ri Shin & Young-Sun Kim & Gurvan Branellec & Ji-Yong Lee, 2022. "Fintech et seniors Sud-Coréens : Une étude des facteurs d'acceptation," Post-Print hal-03584620, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03584620
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03584620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03584620/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    2. Quentin Oget, 2021. "When Economic Promises Shape Innovation and Networks: A Structural Analysis of Technological Innovation in the Silver Economy," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 55-80.
    3. Posner, Richard A., 1995. "Aging and Old Age," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226675664, Febrero.
    4. Denis Guiot & Ziad Malas & Eloïse Sengès, 2014. "Peut-on prédire la consommation des 50-65 ans à partir du critère du Bien Vieillir Désiré ?," Post-Print hal-01651174, HAL.
    5. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1992. "The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 434-448, December.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14133 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    8. Quentin Oget, 2021. "When Economic Promises Shape Innovation and Networks: A Structural Analysis of Technological Innovation in the Silver Economy," Post-Print hal-03321141, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    2. Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei & David Morquin & Claudio Vitari, 2016. "Perceptions of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR): lessons from a French longitudinal survey," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923438, HAL.
    3. Gabriel JIPA, 2018. "Mobile Applications Buying Opinions Exploration using Topic Modeling," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 44-55.
    4. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    5. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    6. Minseok Choi & Kyeongseok Han & Jeongil Choi, 2015. "The effects of product attributes and service quality of transportation card solutions on service user’s continuance and word-of-mouth intention," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 463-490, September.
    7. Hoon S. Cha & Jong Hyun Wi & Chanhi Park & Taeha Kim, 2021. "Sustainability Calculus in Adopting Smart Speakers—Personalized Services and Privacy Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Johannes Putzke & Detlef Schoder & Kai Fischbach, 2010. "Adoption of Mass-Customized Newspapers: An Augmented Technology Acceptance Perspective," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 143-164.
    9. Yang-Chieh Chin, 2016. "Consumer Acceptance of Online Complaint Forms: An Integration of TPB, TAM and Values Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 265-279, December.
    10. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    12. John A. Aloysius & Hartmut Hoehle & Soheil Goodarzi & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2018. "Big data initiatives in retail environments: Linking service process perceptions to shopping outcomes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 25-51, November.
    13. Ainsworth, Jeremy & Ballantine, Paul W., 2017. "Consumers’ cognitive response to website change," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 56-66.
    14. Oliver Michler & Reinhold Decker & Christian Stummer, 2020. "To trust or not to trust smart consumer products: a literature review of trust-building factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 391-420, August.
    15. Rolfsen Christian Nordahl & Lassen Ann Karina, 2020. "On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2064-2071, January.
    16. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Avornyo, Philip & Fang, Jiaming & Antwi, Collins Opoku & Aboagye, Michael Osei & Boadi, Evans Asante, 2019. "Are customers still with us? The influence of optimum stimulation level and IT-specific traits on mobile banking discontinuous usage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 348-360.
    18. Mital, Monika & Chang, Victor & Choudhary, Praveen & Papa, Armando & Pani, Ashis K., 2018. "Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 339-346.
    19. Lorne D. Booker & Brian Detlor & Alexander Serenko, 2012. "Factors affecting the adoption of online library resources by business students," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(12), pages 2503-2520, December.
    20. Maria Tsourela & Dafni-Maria Nerantzaki, 2020. "An Internet of Things (IoT) Acceptance Model. Assessing Consumer’s Behavior toward IoT Products and Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fintech; Technology Acceptance; Seniors; Acceptation de la technologie;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03584620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.