IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02671149.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On inefficiencies in the European sugar regime
[Facteurs d'inefficacité économique dans la politique sucrière en Europe]

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Christophe Bureau

    (ECO-PUB - Economie Publique - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - INA P-G - Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon)

  • Herve Guyomard

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Vincent V. Requillart

    (Station d'économie et sociologie rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

Sont étudiées trois sources d'inefficacité économique dans le régime sucre de la politique agricole commune. Le premier est dans l'allocation rigide qu'impose le régime actuel de quota difficilement transférable. Des simulations sont présentées sur l'impact d'un marché pan-européen des quotas. La seconde source d'inefficacité étudiée est le régime de financement des exportations du sucre "A" et "B". Bien que le régime soit neutre sur un plan budgétaire, une réforme de ces catégories de quotas, qui pourrait passer par une baisse du quota global, pourrait se révéler payante pour les agriculteurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Christophe Bureau & Herve Guyomard & Vincent V. Requillart, 2001. "On inefficiencies in the European sugar regime [Facteurs d'inefficacité économique dans la politique sucrière en Europe]," Post-Print hal-02671149, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02671149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bureau, Jean-Christophe, et al, 1997. "Quota Mobility in the European Sugar Regime," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30.
    2. Hervé Guyomard & Xavier Delache & Xavier Irz & Louis‐Pascal Mane, 1996. "A Microeconometric Analysis Of Milk Quota Transfer: Application To French Producers," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 206-223, January.
    3. Rucker, Randal R & Thurman, Walter N & Sumner, Daniel A, 1995. "Restricting the Market for Quota: An Analysis of Tobacco Production Rights with Corroboration from Congressional Testimony," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(1), pages 142-175, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theodore Levantis & Frank Jotzo & Vivek Tulpulé, 2005. "Sweetening the Transition in EU Sugar Preferences: The Case of Fiji," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 893-915, June.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    3. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jo Swinnen, 2008. "Static and Dynamic Distributional Effects of Decoupled Payments," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 51(2), pages 20-47.
    4. Gohin, Alexandre & Bureau, Jean-Christophe, 2005. "Sugar Market Liberalization: Modeling the EU Supply of "C" Sugar," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24740, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Huan-Niemi, Ellen & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2003. "The Impact of Preferential, Regional and Multilateral Trade Agreements: A Case Study of the EU Sugar Regime," ENARPRI Working Papers 25134, European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes (ENARPRI).
    6. Chopin, Pierre & Doré, Thierry & Guindé, Loïc & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2015. "MOSAICA: A multi-scale bioeconomic model for the design and ex ante assessment of cropping system mosaics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 26-39.
    7. Ellen Huan-Niemi & Jyrki Niemi, 2003. "The impact of preferential, regional and multilateral trade agreements: a case study of the EU sugar regime," ENARPRI Working Papers 001, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    8. Gotor, Elisabetta & Tsigas, Marinos E., 2011. "The impact of the EU sugar trade reform on poor households in developing countries: A general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 568-582, July.
    9. repec:lic:licosd:20708 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Naudé, Wim & Rossouw, Riaan, 2008. "South African quotas on textile imports from China: A policy error?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 737-750.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    2. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jo Swinnen, 2008. "Static and Dynamic Distributional Effects of Decoupled Payments," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 51(2), pages 20-47.
    3. repec:lic:licosd:20708 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Barkaoui, A. & Butault, J. P. & Guyomard, H., 1997. "Mobilité des droits à produire dans l'Union européenne : Conséquences d'un marché des quotas laitiers à l'échelle régionale, nationale ou communautaire," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 44.
    5. Frederic Chantreuil & J. Mathurin, 1997. "Implementation of a production control program within the EU : a cooperative games approach," Working Papers hal-01593978, HAL.
    6. Renwick, Alan W. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Reader, Mark A., 2005. "Uk Sugar Beet Farm Productivity Under Different Reform Scenarios: A Farm Level Analysis," Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Papers 31936, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy.
    7. Eric Tollens, 2004. "Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: the one euro question," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Sckokai, Paolo, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Econometric Models," Working Papers 14800, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    9. Nancy H. Chau & Harry de Gorter, 2005. "Disentangling the Consequences of Direct Payment Schemes in Agriculture on Fixed Costs, Exit Decisions, and Output," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1174-1181.
    10. Jeroen BUYSSE & Bruno FERNAGUT & Olivier HARMIGNIE & Bruno HENRY DE FRAHAN & Ludwig LAUWERS & Philippe POLOMÉ & Guido VAN HUYLENBROECK & Jef VAN MEENSEL, 2010. "Modelling the Impact of Sugar Reform on Belgian Agriculture," EcoMod2004 330600031, EcoMod.
    11. Elskamp, Rebecca & Hailu, Getu, 2013. "Do Efficient Dairy Producers Purchase Quota?," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149678, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Gohin, Alexandre & Bureau, Jean-Christophe, 2006. "WTO Discipline and the CAP: the Constraints on the EU Sugar Sector," Working Papers 18872, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    13. Ramsey, Austin F. & Goodwin, Barry K., 2024. "A Different 'Law of One Price:' Missouri's Livestock Marketing Law of 1999," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343679, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Aldanondo, Ana Maria & Puertolas, Javier, 2002. "International Quota Transfer and Intermediate Goods," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24851, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Patricia Combette & Éric Giraud-Héraud & Vincent Réquillart, 1997. "La politique sucrière européenne après les accords du Gatt," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 127(1), pages 1-13.
    16. Haß, Marlen, 2016. "Der Zuckermarkt Im Wandel: Was Passiert Nach Dem Eu-Quotenende?," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 245190, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    17. Sauer, Johannes, 2008. "Quota Deregulation and Organic versus Conventional Milk – A Bayesian Distance Function Approach," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6425, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Renwick, Alan W. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2005. "Analysis Of The Impact On Uk Sugar Production Efficiency Of Reforming The Eu Sugar Regime," Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Papers 31938, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy.
    19. Renwick, Alan W. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2005. "Crop Substitution On Uk Sugar Beet Farms And Its Effects On The Environment: A Multi-Product Cost Function Approach," Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Papers 31933, University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy.
    20. Irena Benešová & Helena Řezbová & Luboš Smutka & Karel Tomšík & Adriana Laputková, 2015. "European Sugar Market - Impact of Quota System," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(6), pages 1825-1838.
    21. Grafton, R Quentin & Squires, Dale & Fox, Kevin J, 2000. "Private Property and Economic Efficiency: A Study of a Common-Pool Resource," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 679-713, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02671149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.