IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02441292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Overcoming the risks of restructuring through the integrative bargaining process: Two case studies in a French context

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Garaudel

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Florent Noël

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Géraldine Schmidt

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

Abstract

In this paper we analyse two French restructuring cases, using Walton and McKersie's theoretical framework, and provide evidence of the potential of integrative bargaining in restructuring. We argue that any restructuring situation, even in an unfavourable context such as the French, displays an integrative potential, in that employers' and employees' risks are closely interrelated and these risks can be successfully addressed in a cooperative way. The two cases are from widely contrasting contexts: a medium-sized firm in the declining textile industry, and a large insurance company with no short-term economic threat. We show to what extent the underlying bargaining processes are illustrative of an integrative approach as defined by Walton and McKersie and that such an approach may prevail in different kinds of situation, decline-related as well as competition-enhancing restructurings. Moreover, in reference with the four sub-processes developed in the Walton and MacKersie's model, we analyse how and under which conditions an integrative approach can be achieved. Finally, we discuss theoretical implications concerning the application of this model to restructuring processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Garaudel & Florent Noël & Géraldine Schmidt, 2008. "Overcoming the risks of restructuring through the integrative bargaining process: Two case studies in a French context," Post-Print hal-02441292, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02441292
    DOI: 10.1177/0018726708094913
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02441292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02441292/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0018726708094913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radin, Tara J. & Werhane, Patricia H., 2003. "Employment-at-Will, Employee Rights, and Future Directions for Employment," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 113-130, April.
    2. Brockner, Joel & Wiesenfeld, Batia M. & Martin, Christopher L., 1995. "Decision Frame, Procedural Justice, and Survivors' Reactions to Job Layoffs," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 59-68, July.
    3. Nicolas Bacon & Paul Blyton, 2007. "Conflict for Mutual Gains?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 814-834, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent Pasquier & Rémi Bourguignon & Géraldine Schmidt, 2020. "La négociation des Plans de Sauvegarde de l'Emploi, quels arbitrages ?," Working Papers hal-03045537, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Behrens & Markus Helfen, 2016. "The Foundations of Social Partnership," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 334-357, June.
    2. Ganegoda, Deshani B. & Folger, Robert, 2015. "Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 27-36.
    3. Ali Ünal & Danielle Warren & Chao Chen, 2012. "The Normative Foundations of Unethical Supervision in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 5-19, April.
    4. Freling, Traci H. & Vincent, Leslie H. & Henard, David H., 2014. "When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 95-109.
    5. Sushmita Biswal Waraich & Gopa Bhardwaj, 2002. "Workforce Reduction and Survivors' Psyche: A Review," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 27(4), pages 229-244, October.
    6. Caleb Bernacchio, 2021. "Virtue Beyond Contract: A MacIntyrean Approach to Employee Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 227-240, June.
    7. Fanny Bastian & Nicolas Poussing, 2023. "Analyzing the employee/employer relationships in the corporate social responsibility context: An empirical investigation of SMEs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2011-2020, July.
    8. Vikram R. Bhargava & Suneal Bedi, 2022. "Brand as Promise," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 919-936, September.
    9. Kay, Adam A. & Skarlicki, Daniel P., 2020. "Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 8-20.
    10. Dan Munter & Lars Lindblom, 2017. "Beyond Coercion: Moral Assessment in the Labour Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 59-70, April.
    11. Levin, Irwin P. & Schneider, Sandra L. & Gaeth, Gary J., 1998. "All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 149-188, November.
    12. Eva E. Tsahuridu, 2006. "Anomie and Ethics at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 163-174, December.
    13. Richard Marens, 2010. "Speaking Platitudes to Power: Observing American Business Ethics in an Age of Declining Hegemony," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 239-253, August.
    14. Wiesenfeld, Batia M. & Brockner, Joel & Thibault, Valerie, 2000. "Procedural Fairness, Managers' Self-Esteem, and Managerial Behaviors Following a Layoff," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-32, September.
    15. Wenchuan Liu & James P. Guthrie & Patrick C. Flood & Sarah Maccurtain, 2009. "Unions and the Adoption of High Performance Work Systems: Does Employment Security Play a Role?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(1), pages 109-127, October.
    16. Daniel J. Zizzo & Andrew J. Oswald, 2001. "Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others'Incomes?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 63-64, pages 39-65.
    17. Muhamamd Zia-ur Rehman & Riasat Ali Khan & Noor Hassan, 2016. "Investigating the Role of Beliefs and Professional Values in HR Management," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 150-166, June.
    18. Harry Buren & Michelle Greenwood, 2008. "Enhancing Employee Voice: Are Voluntary Employer–Employee Partnerships Enough?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 209-221, August.
    19. Lee, Fiona & Tiedens, Larissa Z., 2001. "Who's Being Served? "Self-Serving" Attributions in Social Hierarchies," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 254-287, March.
    20. Paul A. Lengermann, 2002. "Is it Who You Are, Where You Work, or With Whom You Work? Reassessing the Relationship Between Skill Segregation and Wage Inequality," Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical Papers 2002-10, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02441292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.