IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02387089.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'ambidextrie comme mode de gestion du paradoxe individuel-collectif : le cas d'une grande banque française

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Jarnias

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Vichara Kin

    (CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Ingrid Mazzilli

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Oiry Ewan

Abstract

Cet article analyse la façon dont l'ambidextrie pourrait être considérée comme un mode de gestion du paradoxe individuel/collectif inscrit dans la GRH des entreprises. Les paradoxes constituent le coeur de nombreuses dynamiques organisationnelles. En particulier, en GRH, les politiques individualisantes et la segmentation de la GRH construisent souvent un paradoxe avec le travail en équipe et la collaboration. Cet article étudie la façon dont différentes formes de l'ambidextrie (structurelle, temporelle, de réseau et contextuelle) participent à la gestion de ce paradoxe. Les données (entretiens et observations) rassemblées dans une banque de détail permettent de mettre en évidence comment le paradoxe individuel/collectif se construit dans cette entreprise et comment les formes d'ambidextries identifiées parviennent-pour partie-à gérer ce paradoxe. Ces résultats permettent de développer des pistes de discussion avec la littérature existante, en particulier, sur le rôle que les politiques RH peuvent jouer dans le soutien de cette ambidextrie.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Jarnias & Vichara Kin & Ingrid Mazzilli & Oiry Ewan, 2019. "L'ambidextrie comme mode de gestion du paradoxe individuel-collectif : le cas d'une grande banque française," Post-Print hal-02387089, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02387089
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02387089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02387089/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maël Sommer & Karine Gauche & Leila Temri, 2018. "Petites entreprises en système de management collectif. Vers une gestion constructive des paradoxes de la durabilité ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(5), pages 111-125.
    2. Anne-Sophie Thelisson & Olivier Meier & Audrey Missonier & Gilles Guieu & Amaury Grimand & Ewan Oiry & Aurélien Ragaigne, 2018. "Comment gérer une intégration post-fusion ?," Post-Print hal-02011228, HAL.
    3. Wendy K. Smith & Michael L. Tushman, 2005. "Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 522-536, October.
    4. Caroline Tahar, 2018. "Des recettes marchandes pour un service public, une stratégie paradoxale ?. Une recherche intervention au sein d’un Crous," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(5), pages 77-90.
    5. V. Chanal & C. Defelix & S. Dhiffalah, 2008. "Quelle gestion des ressources humaines dans les organisations ambidextres ?," Post-Print halshs-00365136, HAL.
    6. Sebastian Raisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Gilbert Probst & Michael L. Tushman, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 685-695, August.
    7. Khoudia Guèye & Elise Marcandella, 2018. "Rôle des tensions dans les projets innovants collaboratifs. Étude longitudinale du projet SIRUS," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(5), pages 147-164.
    8. Bérangère Condomines & Émilie Hennequin, 2018. "Un salarié compétent est-il nécessairement performant ?," Post-Print hal-02369600, HAL.
    9. Caroline Tahar, 2018. "Des recettes marchandes pour un service public, une stratégie paradoxale ? - Une recherche intervention au sein d’un Crous," Post-Print halshs-01970038, HAL.
    10. Anne-Sophie Thelisson & Olivier Meier & Audrey Missonier & Gilles Guieu, 2018. "Comment gérer une intégration post-fusion ?," Post-Print halshs-02425556, HAL.
    11. Francisco Diaz Hermelo & Roberto Vassolo, 2010. "Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1457-1473, December.
    12. Justine Arnoud & Cathy Krohmer & Pierre Falzon, 2018. "Dilemmes et paradoxes, quels effets sur le travail, quelles actions de prévention ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(5), pages 165-177.
    13. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    14. Sawsen Dhifallah & Valérie Chanal & Christian Defélix, 2008. "Quelle gestion des ressources humaines dans les organisations ambidextres ?," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(7), pages 161-175.
    15. Gilde Ralandison & Éric Milliot & Victor Harison, 2018. "Les paradoxes de l’intégration coopétitive. Une approche fondée sur la sociologie de la traduction," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(1), pages 127-142.
    16. Maël Sommer & Karine Gauche & Leila Temri, 2018. "Petites entreprises en système de management collectif : vers une gestion constructive des paradoxes de la durabilité ?," Post-Print hal-01950456, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurélie Dudézert & Pierre Fayard & Cécile Gaumand & Oiry Ewan, 2014. "Au-delà de l’ambidextrie : les apports de l’approche japonaise du management des connaissances," Post-Print hal-02971531, HAL.
    2. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    4. Jan Ossenbrink & Joern Hoppmann & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2019. "Hybrid Ambidexterity: How the Environment Shapes Incumbents’ Use of Structural and Contextual Approaches," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1319-1348, November.
    5. Koryak, Oksana & Lockett, Andy & Hayton, James & Nicolaou, Nicos & Mole, Kevin, 2018. "Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 413-427.
    6. Priyono Anjar & Nursyamsiah Siti & Darmawan Baziedy A., 2019. "Managing ambidexterity in internationalisation of SMEs from an emerging country: A dynamic capability perspective," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 7-26, December.
    7. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2020. "Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 363-372.
    8. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Ku-Ho Lin & Dennis Liute Peng & Peihua Chen, 2019. "Linking Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: The Drivers of Sustainability in High-Tech Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Jan Ossenbrink & Joern Hoppmann, 2019. "Polytope Conditioning and Linear Convergence of the Frank–Wolfe Algorithm," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 1319-1348, February.
    10. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Ku-Ho Lin, 2019. "Impact of Ambidexterity and Environmental Dynamism on Dynamic Capability Development Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Gomes, Paulo J. & Silva, Graça Miranda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Faris Alghamdi, 2018. "Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Karl Aschenbrücker & Tobias Kretschmer, 2022. "Performance-based incentives and innovative activity in small firms: evidence from German manufacturing," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(2), pages 47-64, June.
    15. Jeon, Euiju & Maula, Markku, 2022. "Progress toward understanding tensions in corporate venture capital: A systematic review," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).
    16. Yasser Alizadeh & Antonie J. Jetter, 2019. "Pathways for Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Innovations: A Review and Expansion of Ambidexterity Theory," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-33, August.
    17. Olli-Pekka Kauppila & Michiel P. Tempelaar, 2016. "The Social-Cognitive Underpinnings of Employees’ Ambidextrous Behaviour and the Supportive Role of Group Managers’ Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1019-1044, September.
    18. Frédéric C. Godart & Andrew V. Shipilov & Kim Claes, 2014. "Making the Most of the Revolving Door: The Impact of Outward Personnel Mobility Networks on Organizational Creativity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    19. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    20. Natalie Slawinski & Pratima Bansal, 2015. "Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 531-549, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02387089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.