IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00650474.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Confiance et coopération entre le contrôleur de gestion et les managers : Une relation réciproque

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Jedidi

    (ISCAE - UMA - Université de la Manouba [Tunisie])

  • Wafa Khlif

    (LIGUE - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire en Gestion : Université-Entreprise - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)

Abstract

When some papers are used to considering that interactions between management controller and managers may be a source of problems, others researchers defend the cooperation relationship between these two groups of actors. This cooperation can be related to some factors particular the trust. Based on this viewpoint, the article endeavors to study the subject and the frequency of cooperation between management controller and mangers on one hand, and to examine the tie between trust and cooperation. In order to do this, a survey conducted about management controllers and managers is presented. The results have enabled us to emphasize a reciprocal relationship between trust and cooperation: the least little bit of trust is necessary to cooperate and the cooperation relationship reinforces trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Jedidi & Wafa Khlif, 2011. "Confiance et coopération entre le contrôleur de gestion et les managers : Une relation réciproque," Post-Print hal-00650474, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00650474
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00650474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00650474/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Pierre Segal, 1991. "Peut-on vaincre les résistances au contrôle de gestion en France ?," Post-Print hal-00823295, HAL.
    2. Ferrin, Donald L. & Bligh, Michelle C. & Kohles, Jeffrey C., 2008. "It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 161-178, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buckley, Peter J. & Cross, Adam & De Mattos, Claudio, 2015. "The principle of congruity in the analysis of international business cooperation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1048-1060.
    2. Kurt T. Dirks & Patrick J. Sweeney & Nikolaos Dimotakis & Todd Woodruff, 2022. "Understanding the Change and Development of Trust and the Implications for New Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 711-730, October.
    3. Bill McEvily, 2011. "Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1266-1276, October.
    4. Rieger, Verena & Klarmann, Martin, 2022. "The effect of cooperative team culture on innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1256-1271.
    5. Dejun Tony Kong & Violet T. Ho & Sargam Garg, 2020. "Employee and Coworker Idiosyncratic Deals: Implications for Emotional Exhaustion and Deviant Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 593-609, July.
    6. Esther Cuadrado & Carmen Tabernero, 2015. "Affective Balance, Team Prosocial Efficacy and Team Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of Prosocial Behavior in Small Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Beenish Arshad & Muhammad Ali & Amna Niazi, 2020. "Team monitoring useful or not useful?," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 6(4), pages 117-128.
    8. Tae-Yeol Kim & Jie Wang & Junsong Chen, 2018. "Mutual Trust Between Leader and Subordinate and Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(4), pages 945-958, June.
    9. Jorge Walter & Daniel Z. Levin & J. Keith Murnighan, 2015. "Reconnection Choices: Selecting the Most Valuable (vs. Most Preferred) Dormant Ties," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1447-1465, October.
    10. Bstieler, Ludwig & Hemmert, Martin & Barczak, Gloria, 2017. "The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university-industry research collaborations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-54.
    11. Jakub Soviar & Martin Holubčík & Josef Vodák, 2018. "Regional Cooperation Ecosystem: Case of the Žilina Self-Government Region (Slovak Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Song, Le & Ma, Yinghong, 2022. "Evaluating tacit knowledge diffusion with algebra matrix algorithm based social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    13. Patricia Elgoibar & Elio Shijaku, 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Weber, Clarissa E. & Maurer, Indre, 2023. "Knowledge acquisition from host-country partners: The interplay of trust and legal safeguards," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    15. Yeomans, Michael & Minson, Julia & Collins, Hanne & Chen, Frances & Gino, Francesca, 2020. "Conversational receptiveness: Improving engagement with opposing views," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 131-148.
    16. Denise Fleck & Roger J. Volkema & Sergio Pereira, 2016. "Dancing on the Slippery Slope: The Effects of Appropriate Versus Inappropriate Competitive Tactics on Negotiation Process and Outcome," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 873-899, September.
    17. Julie Demaret & Jérôme Méric, 2013. "La Constitution De La Legitimite Des Controleurs De Gestion : Une Etude Exploratoire," Post-Print hal-00991887, HAL.
    18. Oana C. Fodor & Alina M. Fleștea & Iulian Onija & Petru L. Curșeu, 2018. "Networks Originate in Minds: An Exploration of Trust Self-Enhancement and Network Centrality in Multiparty Systems," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Paola Gatti & Michelle C Bligh & Claudio G Cortese, 2019. "When a leader job resource can be ambivalent or even destructive: Independence at work as a double-edged sword," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Russell Lacey & Pamela Kennett-Hensel, 2010. "Longitudinal Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 581-597, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00650474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.