Detection and Interpretation of Communities in Complex Networks: Methods and Practical Application
Community detection is an important part of network analysis and has become a very popular field of research. This activity resulted in a profusion of community detection algorithms, all different in some not always clearly defined sense. This makes it very difficult to select an appropriate tool when facing the concrete task of having to identify and interpret groups of nodes, relatively to a system of interest. In this article, we tackle this problem in a very practical way, from the user's point of view. We first review community detection algorithms and characterize them in terms of the nature of the communities they detect. We then focus on the methodological tools one can use to analyze the obtained community structure, both in terms of topological features and nodal attributes. To be as concrete as possible, we use a real-world social network to illustrate the application of the presented tools, and give examples of interpretation of their results from a Business Science perspective.
|Date of creation:||2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Computational Social Networks: Tools, Perspectives and Applications, Springer, pp.81-113, 2012, <10.1007/978-1-4471-4048-1_4>|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00633653v3|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:dau:papers:123456789/654 is not listed on IDEAS
- G. Agarwal & D. Kempe, 2008. "Modularity-maximizing graph communities via mathematical programming," The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 409-418, December.
- R. Luce, 1950. "Connectivity and generalized cliques in sociometric group structure," Psychometrika, The Psychometric Society, vol. 15(2), pages 169-190, June.
- Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, 05.
- Mark S. Handcock & Adrian E. Raftery & Jeremy M. Tantrum, 2007. "Model-based clustering for social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 301-354.
- Lawrence Hubert & Phipps Arabie, 1985. "Comparing partitions," Journal of Classification, The Classification Society, vol. 2(1), pages 193-218, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00633653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.