IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/othbrf/174463.html

Understanding women’s time use in farming communities: Insights from the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index

Author

Listed:
  • Abdu, Aishat
  • Malapit, Hazel J.
  • Go, Ara

Abstract

Agricultural programs targeting women may increase women’s work burdens and shift the distribution of work between productive and reproductive tasks. Complementary information on women’s sense of control over their time highlights additional benefits of agricultural programs beyond changes in women’s workloads. Despite program interventions, gender norms often persist, affecting how communities perceive work intensity and division of responsibilities between men and women. The relationship between women’s time use and nutrition is complex and interacts with mediating factors, requiring a multifaceted approach to program design and evaluation. Evidence linking time use data to nonfarm work is lacking, highlighting the need to leverage WEAI time use data to fill this critical gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdu, Aishat & Malapit, Hazel J. & Go, Ara, 2025. "Understanding women’s time use in farming communities: Insights from the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," Other briefs 3, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:174463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/174463
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnston, Deborah & Stevano, Sara & Malapit, Hazel J. & Hull, Elizabeth & Kadiyala, Suneetha, 2018. "Review: Time Use as an Explanation for the Agri-Nutrition Disconnect: Evidence from Rural Areas in Low and Middle-Income Countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 8-18.
    2. Greg Seymour & Hazel Malapit & Agnes Quisumbing, 2020. "Measuring Time Use in Developing Country Agriculture: Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 169-199, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierotti, Rachael S. & Friedson-Ridenour, Sophia & Olayiwola, Olubukola, 2022. "Women farm what they can manage: How time constraints affect the quantity and quality of labor for married women’s agricultural production in southwestern Nigeria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Kilic,Talip & Koolwal,Gayatri B. & Vundru,Wilbert Drazi & Daum,Thomas Lothar Georg & Buchwald,Hannes & Seymour,Greg & Mvula,Peter Mathias & Munthali,Alister Chaundumuka & Kachinjika,Monice, 2024. "Recording the Time Divide : A Comparative Study of Smartphone- and Recall-Based Approaches to Time Use Measurement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10695, The World Bank.
    3. Sarah Eissler & Jessica Heckert & Emily Myers & Greg Seymour & Sheela Sinharoy & Kathryn Yount, 2022. "Measuring Women's Empowerment: Gender and Time‐use Agency in Benin, Malawi and Nigeria," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(5), pages 1010-1034, September.
    4. Margolies, Amy & Colantuoni, Elizabeth & Morgan, Rosemary & Gelli, Aulo & Caulfield, Laura, 2023. "The burdens of participation: A mixed-methods study of the effects of a nutrition-sensitive agriculture program on women’s time use in Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Melaku, Astewale Bimr & Qaim, Matin & Debela, Bethelhem Legesse, 2024. "Maternal employment in high-value agriculture and child nutrition: Evidence from the Ethiopian cut-flower industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Liu, Huacong & Fernandez, Frank & Dutz, Gregor, 2022. "Educational attainment, use of numeracy at work, and gender wage gaps: Evidence from 12 middle-income countries," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Oluyemi Adewole Okunlola & Yacouba Kassouri, 2023. "Empirical investigation of the agriculture–malnutrition nexus in Africa: Spatial clustering and spillover effects," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 685-709, May.
    8. Madhulika Khanna & Milan Thomas, 2024. "Gendered time poverty in three developing countries: An intra‐household analysis of children's time use," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 316-342, January.
    9. Hiroyuki Takeshima & Kamiljon Akramov & Allen Park & Jarilkasin Ilyasov & Tanzila Ergasheva, 2022. "Agriculture-Nutrition Linkages, Cooking-Time, Intrahousehold Equality Among Women and Children: Evidence from Tajikistan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 940-977, April.
    10. Field, Erica & Pande, Rohini & Rigol, Natalia & Schaner, Simone & Stacy, Elena & Moore, Charity Troyer, 2023. "Measuring time use in rural India: Design and validation of a low-cost survey module," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Els Lecoutere & Alessandra Galiè & Bjorn Van Campenhout & Marlène Elias & Markus Ihalainen & Lara Roeven & Preeti Bharati & Ana Maria Paez Valencia & Mary Crossland & Barbara, 2023. "Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 294-316, July.
    12. Melaku, Astewale Bimr & Debela, Bethelhem Legesse & Qaim, Matin, 2023. "Women’s employment in high-value agriculture and child nutrition: Evidence from the Ethiopian cut-flower industry," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335848, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Elizabeth Mkandawire & Melody Mentz-Coetzee & Margaret Najjingo Mangheni & Eleonora Barusi, 2021. "Enhancing the Glopan Food Systems Framework by Integrating Gender: Relevance for Women in African Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Thomas Daum & Regina Birner, 2022. "The forgotten agriculture-nutrition link: farm technologies and human energy requirements," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 395-409, April.
    15. Starkweather, Kathrine & Keith, Monica & Zohora, Fatema tuz & Alam, Nurul, 2024. "Impacts of women's work and childcare on child illness among Bangladeshi Shodagor communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    16. Yeyoung Lee & Beliyou Haile & Greg Seymour & Carlo Azzarri, 2021. "The heat never bothered me anyway: Gender‐specific response of agricultural labor to climatic shocks in Tanzania," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 732-749, June.
    17. Nichols, Carly E. & Kumari, Nidhi, 2025. "Centering the body in agricultural development: Bridging conceptualizations of bodies-as-mechanism and bodies-as-affective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    18. Chrisendo, Daniel & Krishna, Vijesh V. & Siregar, Hermanto & Qaim, Matin, 2020. "Land-use change, nutrition, and gender roles in Indonesian farm households," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Rebecca Kyerewaa Dwommoh Prah & Daniel Carrion & Felix Boakye Oppong & Theresa Tawiah & Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba & Stephaney Gyaase & Adolphine Kwarteng & Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise & Oscar Agyei & Mi, 2020. "Time Use Implication of Clean Cookstoves in Rural Settings in Ghana: A Time Use Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. repec:ags:aaea22:335848 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Quisumbing, Agnes & Ahmed, Akhter & Hoddinott, John & Pereira, Audrey & Roy, Shalini, 2021. "Designing for empowerment impact in agricultural development projects: Experimental evidence from the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:othbrf:174463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.