IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/25047.html

Voting for Gender Balancing? The effect of a multiple-vote system on women’s representation

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshikuni ONO
  • Hirofumi MIWA
  • Yuko KASUYA

Abstract

Does allowing voters to choose multiple candidates foster diversity in legislative bodies? Majoritarian systems typically restrict voters to casting a ballot for one candidate, yet research suggests that permitting voters to select multiple candidates could boost the election of women and racial minorities. Despite indications of greater diversity under multiple-vote systems, voter behavior evidence remains scarce. To address this, our survey experiment varied the number of selectable candidates on a ballot in local elections. Results revealed that respondents alternated candidate genders, particularly in their second and third choices, supporting the theory that multiple voting promotes diverse representation. However, men more frequently became their first choice when multiple candidates were selectable, giving male candidates an overall advantage on the aggregate level.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshikuni ONO & Hirofumi MIWA & Yuko KASUYA, 2025. "Voting for Gender Balancing? The effect of a multiple-vote system on women’s representation," Discussion papers 25047, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:25047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/25e047.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mummolo, Jonathan & Peterson, Erik, 2019. "Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(2), pages 517-529, May.
    2. Sona N. Golder & Laura B. Stephenson & Karine van Der Straeten & André Blais & Damien Bol & Philipp Harfst & Jean-François Laslier, 2017. "Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates," Post-Print halshs-01518271, HAL.
    3. Hainmueller, Jens & Hopkins, Daniel J. & Yamamoto, Teppei, 2014. "Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-30, January.
    4. Catalinac, Amy, 2018. "Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems: Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(1), pages 31-48, February.
    5. Kostanca Dhima & Sona Golder & Laura Stephenson & Karine van Der Straeten, 2021. "Permissive electoral systems and descriptive representation," Post-Print hal-03542971, HAL.
    6. Schaffner, Brian F., 2022. "Optimizing the Measurement of Sexism in Political Surveys," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 364-380, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barceló, Joan & Sheen, Greg Chih-Hsin & Tung, Hans H. & Wu, Wen-Chin, 2022. "Vaccine nationalism among the public: A cross-country experimental evidence of own-country bias towards COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. repec:osf:socarx:7ady6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Julio Elías & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2026. "Is the Price Right? The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in Explaining Reactions to Price Surges," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1814-1834, March.
    4. Lala Muradova & Ross James Gildea, 2021. "Oil wealth and US public support for war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(1), pages 3-19, January.
    5. Haggerty, Fabian & Rudolph, Lukas & Thurner, Paul, 2026. "Cross-Country Differences in Citizens‘ Reactions to Arms Transfers. How united is NATO?," SocArXiv wqka2_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Lisanne de Blok & Max Heermann & Julian Schuessler & Dirk Leuffen & Catherine E. de Vries, 2024. "All on board? The role of institutional design for public support for differentiated integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 593-604, September.
    7. Park, Seollee & Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant, 2026. "The effects of nutrition support on behavioral outcomes and labor productivity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    9. Catherine E De Vries & Simon Hix & Miriam Sorace, 2025. "Reforming supranational institutions: Insights from a conjoint experiment in 16 countries," European Union Politics, , vol. 26(4), pages 649-666, December.
    10. Hamrak, Bence & Simonovits, Gabor & Szucs, Ferenc, 2024. "Equilibrium communication in political scandals," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Krawczyk, Michal & Blasco, Andrea & Gajderowicz, Tomasz & Giergiczny, Marek, 2024. "Support for temporary protection of displaced populations in the EU: A conjoint experiment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Andrea F.M. Martinangeli & Lisa Windsteiger, 2019. "Immigration vs. Poverty: Causal Impact on Demand for Redistribution in a Survey Experiment," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2019-13, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    13. Stephanie Mertens & Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 25-46, January.
    14. Jiawei Fu & Xiaojun Li, 2024. "A Formal Theory of Survey Experiment Generalizability: Attention and Salience," Papers 2405.06779, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    15. Beutel, Johannes & Metiu, Norbert & Stockerl, Valentin, 2021. "Toothless tiger with claws? Financial stability communication, expectations, and risk-taking," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 53-69.
    16. Cattaneo, Maria & Lergetporer, Philipp & Schwerdt, Guido & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger & Wolter, Stefan C., 2020. "Information provision and preferences for education spending: Evidence from representative survey experiments in three countries," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Cavapozzi, Danilo & Francesconi, Marco & Nicoletti, Cheti, 2024. "Dividing Housework between Partners: Individual Preferences and Social Norms," IZA Discussion Papers 17370, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    19. Flörchinger, Daniela & Frondel, Manuel & Sommer, Stephan & Andor, Mark A., 2025. "Pro-environmental behavior and environmentalist movements: Evidence from the identification with Fridays for Future," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Okada, Isamu, 2024. "What procedures matter to social acceptance of mining? A conjoint experiment in Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    21. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Christopher S. Carpenter & Ralph De Haas & Mathias Dolls & Lisa Windsteiger, 2023. "Reducing Sexual Orientation Discrimination: Experimental Evidence from Basic Information Treatments," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 35-59, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:25047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.