IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/23077.html

Does Paying Passive Managers to Engage Improve ESG Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Marco BECHT
  • Julian FRANKS
  • Hideaki MIYAJIMA
  • Kazunori SUZUKI

Abstract

The paper studies a natural experiment in responsible investment conducted by the Japanese Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF). In 2018 GPIF gave its largest passive manager a remunerated mandate to engage with portfolio companies to improve ESG and adopted best-in-class indexes, rewarding high-ESG-scoring companies with additional equity investment. Using private data and difference-in-differences analysis we show that engagement by the asset manager improved scores. In an event study, we find that the conditional portfolio tilt significantly impacts share prices. We also provide evidence that ESG scores for companies in Japan increased significantly more than for companies in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco BECHT & Julian FRANKS & Hideaki MIYAJIMA & Kazunori SUZUKI, 2023. "Does Paying Passive Managers to Engage Improve ESG Performance?," Discussion papers 23077, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:23077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/23e077.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davies, Shaun William & Van Wesep, Edward Dickersin, 2018. "The unintended consequences of divestment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 558-575.
    2. Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Laura T Starks, 2020. "The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 1067-1111.
    3. Heinkel, Robert & Kraus, Alan & Zechner, Josef, 2001. "The Effect of Green Investment on Corporate Behavior," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 431-449, December.
    4. Chattopadhyay, Akash & Shaffer, Matthew D. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2020. "Governance through shame and aspiration: Index creation and corporate behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 704-724.
    5. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    6. A. Craig MacKinlay, 1997. "Event Studies in Economics and Finance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 13-39, March.
    7. Olga Hawn & Aaron K. Chatterji & Will Mitchell, 2018. "Do investors actually value sustainability? New evidence from investor reactions to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI)," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 949-976, April.
    8. Juan M. Villa, 2016. "diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 16(1), pages 52-71, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Hao & Ng, Lilian & Yoon, Aaron, 2025. "Editorial: What have we learned about green and climate finance?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    2. Heeb, Florian & Kölbel, Julian, 2024. "The impact of climate engagement: A field experiment," SAFE Working Paper Series 437, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sascha Kolaric, 2024. "The impact of climate litigation and activism on stock prices: the case of oil and gas majors," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3141-3172, November.
    2. Liao, Kezhi & Wang, Zhihao & Ma, Baichao & Zhang, Yu, 2026. "Capital market international integration and corporate demand for green skills: Evidence from MSCI index inclusion," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Dangl, Thomas & Halling, Michael & Yu, Jin & Zechner, Josef, 2025. "Social preferences and corporate investment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Amin Shakourloo & Asil Azimli, 2025. "The role of greenwashing scandals on investors’ herding behavior," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(3), pages 733-767, September.
    5. Chen, Alvin & Gupta, Deeksha & Starmans, Jan, 2026. "Sustainable investing and market governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Li, Suyang & Qiao, Lu & Ren, Boru & Wang, Zilong, 2025. "Financing sustainability: Sustainable institutional investors and bank loan access," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Gantchev, Nickolay & Giannetti, Mariassunta & Li, Rachel, 2019. "Does Money Talk? Market Discipline through Selloffs and Boycotts," CEPR Discussion Papers 14098, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Deeksha Gupta & Alexandr Kopytov & Jan Starmans, 2026. "The Pace of Change: Socially Responsible Investing in Private Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 39(1), pages 30-78.
    9. Huang, Chenchen & Luo, Di & Mukherjee, Soumyatanu & Mishra, Tapas, 2022. "To Acquire or to Ally? Managing Partners’ Environmental Risk in International Expansion," MPRA Paper 121808, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jan 2023.
    10. Ana M. Silva & José M. Arranz & Carlos García-Serrano, 2026. "Evaluating the impact of the large 2019 increase in the Spanish minimum wage on job retention and employment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei & Mishra, Dev R. & Somé, Hyacinthe Y., 2025. "Firm-level climate sentiments, climate politics and implied cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Luo, Lianfa & Cheng, Zhiming & Ye, Qingqing & Cheng, Yanjun & Smyth, Russell & Yang, Zhiqing & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Nonmonetary awards and innovation: Evidence from winning China's Top Brand Contest," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Fisman, Raymond & Ghosh, Pulak & Sarkar, Arkodipta & Zhang, Jian, 2026. "Dirty air and green investments: The impact of pollution information on portfolio allocations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Berle, Erika & He, Wanwei (Angela) & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2025. "The stock market and corporate consequences of ethical exclusions by the world’s largest fund," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Jinchao Huang & Shuang Meng & Jiajie Yu, 2023. "The Effects of the Low-Carbon Pilot City Program on Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Jerch, Rhiannon & Kahn, Matthew E. & Lin, Gary C., 2023. "Local public finance dynamics and hurricane shocks," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Massimo Mariani & Fabio Pizzutilo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito, 2021. "Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital: Environmental commitment and the cost of capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1854-1869, November.
    20. Bauckloh, Michael Tobias & Beyer, Victor & Klein, Christian, 2022. "Does it pay to invest in dirty industries? New insights on the shunned-stock hypothesis," CFR Working Papers 22-07, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:23077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.