IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/cempwp/cempa9-22.html

Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Richiardi, Matteo
  • Bambra, Clare
  • Brown, Heather
  • Aaron Munford, Luke
  • Sutton, Matt
  • Vittal Katikireddi, Srinivasa
  • Wickham, Sophie
  • Taylor-Robinson, David
  • Gibson, Marcia
  • Craig, Peter
  • Barr, Benjamin
  • J. Baxter, Andrew
  • Cheetham, Mandy
  • Moffatt, Suzanne
  • Morris, Steph
  • Xiang, Huasheng

Abstract

Introduction: The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen’s Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost–consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost–benefit analyses of mitigating actions. Ethics and dissemination: We obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats.

Suggested Citation

  • Richiardi, Matteo & Bambra, Clare & Brown, Heather & Aaron Munford, Luke & Sutton, Matt & Vittal Katikireddi, Srinivasa & Wickham, Sophie & Taylor-Robinson, David & Gibson, Marcia & Craig, Peter & Bar, 2022. "Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA9/22, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/cempa/cempa9-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richiardi, Matteo & Bambra, Clare & Brown, Heather & Vittal Katikireddi, S. & Wickham, Sophie & Craig, Peter & Maria, Marimpi & Andy, Baxter & David, Taylor-Robinson & Mandy, Cheetam & Luke, Monford &, 2025. "A difference-in-differences analysis of the well-being effects of Universal Credit," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA4/25, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niklas Buehren & Shyamal Chowdhury & Sreelakshmi Papineni & Munshi Sulaiman, 2025. "Impact of inputs, information, and financial services on the adoption of a biofortified crop by women farmers in Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(4), pages 1117-1151, August.
    2. Thomas Barnay & Emmanuel Duguet & Christine Le Clainche & Yann Videau, 2019. "An evaluation of the 1987 French Disabled Workers Act: better paying than hiring," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 597-610, June.
    3. Firpo Sergio & Possebom Vitor, 2018. "Synthetic Control Method: Inference, Sensitivity Analysis and Confidence Sets," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Riccardo Di Francesco, 2022. "Aggregation Trees," CEIS Research Paper 546, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 20 Nov 2023.
    5. Marie Bjørneby & Annette Alstadsæter & Kjetil Telle, 2018. "Collusive Tax Evasion by Employers and Employees: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Norway," CESifo Working Paper Series 7381, CESifo.
    6. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2020. "The impact of product subsidies on plant‐level total factor productivity in Britain, 1997–2014," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(4), pages 387-403, September.
    7. Krekel, Christian & Kavetsos, Georgios & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2025. "Passing on the flame: Do mega sports events promote health behaviours?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 377(C).
    8. Donato Romano & Silvio Traverso, 2020. "Disentangling the Impact of International Migration on Food and Nutrition Security of Left-Behind Households: Evidence from Bangladesh," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 783-811, September.
    9. Brantly Callaway & Derek Dyal & Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Emmanuel S. Tsyawo, 2025. "Beyond Parallel Trends: An Identification-Strategy-Robust Approach to Causal Inference with Panel Data," Papers 2511.21977, arXiv.org.
    10. Carolina Caetano & Gregorio Caetano & Brantly Callaway & Derek Dyal, 2025. "Causal Inference for Aggregated Treatment," Papers 2506.22885, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    11. Francesco Manaresi & Alessandro Palma & Luca Salvatici & Vincenzo Scrutinio, 2022. "Managerial input and firm performance. Evidence from a policy experiment," CEP Discussion Papers dp1871, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Alice Lépissier & Matto Mildenberger, 2021. "Unilateral climate policies can substantially reduce national carbon pollution," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Zhexiao Lin & Peng Ding & Fang Han, 2023. "Estimation Based on Nearest Neighbor Matching: From Density Ratio to Average Treatment Effect," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2187-2217, November.
    14. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Susan Athey & David A. Hirshberg & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Synthetic Difference-in-Differences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(12), pages 4088-4118, December.
    15. Pablo Blanchard & Matías Brum & Paula Carrasco & Cecilia Parada & Ivone Perazzo, 2023. "Employment effects of a social and labor inclusion program," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 23-02, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    16. Sven Resnjanskij & Jens Ruhose & Simon Wiederhold & Ludger Wößmann, 2021. "Mentoring verbessert die Arbeitsmarktchancen von stark benachteiligten Jugendlichen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(02), pages 31-38, February.
    17. Kandel, Pratikshya & Pandit, Ram & White, Benedict, 2024. "Impacts of buffer zone policy on household income: Evidence from Chitwan National Park, Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Pierre Cahuc & Pauline Carry & Franck Malherbet & Pedro S Martins, 2022. "Employment Effects of Restricting Fixed-Term Contracts: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers hal-03881622, HAL.
    19. Tristan Le Cotty & Elodie Maître d'Hôtel & Julie Subervie, 2019. "Inventory credit to enhance food security in Africa," CIRED Working Papers hal-02018715, HAL.
    20. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.