IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/jeanmo/p0286.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Citizenship without Respect: The EU's Troubled Equality Ideal

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitry Kochenov /

Abstract

Abstract: The European Union suffers from an empty formalistic reading of the principle of equality when dealing with situations where different legal orders legitimately compete, aspiring to regulate the condition of the same persons in the same circumstances. Consequently, equality before the law is not safeguarded in the Union, and a radical reform of the procedural reading of the principle of equality is required. Most importantly, to live up to being a true principle of EU law, equality in the EU needs to acquire a substantive component which is entirely missing at the moment. This paper looks at the procedural vistas informing the ECJ‘s attempts to address the EU‘s fundamental problems through the redefinition of the scope ratione materiae of EU law following the introduction of Union citizenship, only to find the outcomes of such efforts inadequate and potentially dangerous for the rule of law in Europe. It is suggested that a substantive approach to equality could be employed instead, and that the idea of respect, lying just as equality itself, at the core of the notion of citizenship †and the law as such †could supply the missing core of the equality principle, providing the much-needed cure for some crucial deficiencies of EU law as it currently stands.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitry Kochenov /, 2001. "Citizenship without Respect: The EU's Troubled Equality Ideal," Jean Monnet Working Papers 8, Jean Monnet Chair.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/10/100801.html
    File Function: Contents/abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    citizenship; federalism; nationality; sovereignty; competences; European citizenship; European law; German Constitutional Court; non-discrimination; reverse discrimination;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charlie Pike). General contact details of provider: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.