IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1786.html

Intensity of International Sanctions and Internal Conflict: The Case of Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Farzanegan

    (Philipps-Universität Marburg)

  • Jerg Gutmann

    (University of Hamburg)

Abstract

This study investigates the case of Iran to evaluate how changes in the intensity of international sanctions affect internal conflict in the target country. Estimating a vector autoregressive model for the period between 2001q2 and 2020q3, we find that an increase in sanction intensity causes an increase in both civil disorder and terrorism risk. In contrast, the risk of civil war declines after an increase in sanction intensity. These findings for Iran are consistent with our theoretical predictions and indicate that higher intensity sanctions against a stable autocracy with high repression capacity allow sender country governments to put pressure on a political regime without risking an outbreak of major violent conflicts. Therefore, more intensive sanctions may also not be helpful in inducing violent regime change in such countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Jerg Gutmann, 2025. "Intensity of International Sanctions and Internal Conflict: The Case of Iran," Working Papers 1786, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Aug 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/intensity-of-international-sanctions-and-internal-conflict-the-case-of-iran/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/app/uploads/2025/08/1755502187_703_842182_1786.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Namees Nabeel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.