IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eoe/escoed/escoe-dp-2023-22.html

Who Wants to Improve their Management? Evidence from a Failed Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Meng, Charlotte
  • Mizen, Paul
  • Riley, Rebecca
  • Schneebacher, Jakob

Abstract

Structured management practices are robustly correlated with superior performance, but wide dispersion of management quality persists through time. This paper asks if management practices can bring about these improvements why do we see little change in the distribution of management practices over time? And if improvements to management practices within firms are possible and seemingly profitable over short periods, why is the uptake so low? We design three linked data collection tools to understand these puzzles showing that there is positive selection due to firms’ management practices over time, their characteristics including share of management and educational level of management. These attributes along with subjective beliefs about barriers to improvement all contribute to firms’ willingness to improve and take actions to do so. Our paper shows management practices are a predictor of firm survival and offers some policy interventions to help firms improve.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng, Charlotte & Mizen, Paul & Riley, Rebecca & Schneebacher, Jakob, 2023. "Who Wants to Improve their Management? Evidence from a Failed Experiment," Discussion Papers escoe-dp-2023-22, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence.
  • Handle: RePEc:eoe:escoed:escoe-dp-2023-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.repository-escoe.com/id/eprint/34/1/ESCoE%20DP%202023-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anwar Adem & Richard Kneller & Cher Li, 2023. "Information constraints and technology efficiency: Field experiments benchmarking firms website performance," Discussion Papers 2023-07, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    2. Greg Fischer & Dean Karlan, 2015. "The Catch-22 of External Validity in the Context of Constraints to Firm Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 295-299, May.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Takafumi Kawakubo & Charlotte Meng & Paul Mizen & Rebecca Riley & Tatsuro Senga & John Van Reenen, 2021. "Do Well Managed Firms Make Better Forecasts?," NBER Working Papers 29591, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Wyatt Brooks & Kevin Donovan & Terence R. Johnson, 2018. "Mentors or Teachers? Microenterprise Training in Kenya," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 196-221, October.
    5. Sandra E. Black & Lisa M. Lynch, 2005. "Measuring Organizational Capital in the New Economy," NBER Chapters, in: Measuring Capital in the New Economy, pages 205-236, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Stephen J. Anderson & David McKenzie, 2022. "Improving Business Practices and the Boundary of the Entrepreneur: A Randomized Experiment Comparing Training, Consulting, Insourcing, and Outsourcing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(1), pages 157-209.
    7. Müge Adalet McGowan & Dan Andrews & Valentine Millot & Thorsten BeckManaging Editor, 2018. "The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 33(96), pages 685-736.
    8. Michela Giorcelli, 2019. "The Long-Term Effects of Management and Technology Transfers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 121-152, January.
    9. Miriam Bruhn & Dean Karlan & Antoinette Schoar, 2010. "What Capital Is Missing in Developing Countries?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 629-633, May.
    10. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 203-224, Winter.
    11. Nicholas Bloom & Christos Genakos & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2011. "Management Practices Across Firms and Countries," CEP Discussion Papers dp1109, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Nicholas Bloom & Benn Eifert & Aprajit Mahajan & David McKenzie & John Roberts, 2013. "Does Management Matter? Evidence from India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 1-51.
    13. Oliver Ludewig & Dieter Sadowski, 2009. "Measuring Organizational Capital," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 61(4), pages 393-412, October.
    14. Patricio S Dalton & Julius Rüschenpöhler & Burak Uras & Bilal Zia, 2021. "Curating Local Knowledge: Experimental Evidence from Small Retailers in Indonesia," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(5), pages 2622-2657.
    15. Leonardo Iacovone & William Maloney & David McKenzie, 2022. "Improving Management with Individual and Group-Based Consulting: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Colombia," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(1), pages 346-371.
    16. Miriam Bruhn & Dean Karlan & Antoinette Schoar, 2018. "The Impact of Consulting Services on Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Mexico," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 635-687.
    17. Dean Karlan & Martin Valdivia, 2011. "Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(2), pages 510-527, May.
    18. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(4), pages 1351-1408.
    19. Marianne Bertrand & Antoinette Schoar, 2003. "Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1169-1208.
    20. Haskel, Jonathan & Criscuolo, Chiara & ,, 2007. "Information Technology, Organisational Change and Productivity," CEPR Discussion Papers 6105, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    21. Mariagrazia Squicciarini & Marie Le Mouel, 2012. "Defining and Measuring Investment in Organisational Capital: Using US Microdata to Develop a Task-based Approach," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2012/5, OECD Publishing.
    22. David McKenzie, 2021. "Small business training to improve management practices in developing countries: re-assessing the evidence for ‘training doesn’t work’," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 276-301.
    23. David McKenzie & Christopher Woodruff, 2014. "What Are We Learning from Business Training and Entrepreneurship Evaluations around the Developing World?," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 29(1), pages 48-82.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes & Luis H. Gutiérrez & Juan Carlos Urueña-Mejía & Andrés Felipe Ortiz & Iván Darío Medina Rojas & Mauricio Romero, 2025. "The role of local promoters in helping microentrepreneurs engage in digital business training," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(1), pages 205-242, March.
    2. Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes & Luis H. Gutierrez & Juan Carlos Urueña-Mejia & Andres Ortiz & Ivan Medina Rojas & Mauricio Romero, 2023. "The role of local promoters in helping microentrepreneurs engage in digital business training. The case of Expertienda," Documentos de Trabajo 20902, Universidad del Rosario.
    3. Islam, Asadul & Lee, Wang-Sheng & Triyana, Margaret & Xia, Xing, 2023. "Improving Health and Safety in the Informal Sector: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Bangladesh," IZA Discussion Papers 16150, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Cláudia Custódio & Diogo Mendes & Daniel Metzger, 2025. "The Impact of the Financial Education of Executives on the Financial Practices of Medium and Large Enterprises," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(5), pages 2875-2920, October.
    5. Sivropoulos-Valero, Anna Valero, 2021. "Education and management practices," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114436, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Manaresi, Francesco & Palma, Alessandro & Salvatici, Luca & Scrutinio, Vincenzo, 2022. "Managerial input and firm performance. Evidence from a policy experiment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117989, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Sohail, Faisal, 2021. "From employee to entrepreneur: Learning, employer size, and spinout dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Cardenas, Fernando & Cecchi, Francesco & Lopez Rivas, Jose & Seimel, Natália & Uras, Burak, 2026. "Business Training and Loan Repayment: Experimental Evidence from Microfinance," Other publications TiSEM d04513fb-e9c6-4b4b-8196-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Anna Valero, 2021. "Education and management practices," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 302-322.
    10. Anicet A. Fangwa & Caroline Flammer & Marieke Huysentruyt & Bertrand V. Quélin, 2024. "The Governance of Nonprofits and Their Social Impact: Evidence from a Randomized Program in Healthcare in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2732-2755, May.
    11. Anna Valero, 2021. "Education and management practices," POID Working Papers 007, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. González-Uribe, Juanita & Reyes, Santiago, 2021. "Identifying and boosting “Gazelles”: Evidence from business accelerators," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 260-287.
    13. Mano, Yukichi & Akoten, John & Yoshino, Yutaka & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2014. "Teaching KAIZEN to small business owners: An experiment in a metalworking cluster in Nairobi," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 25-42.
    14. Higuchi, Yuki & Nam, Vu Hoang & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2015. "Sustained impacts of Kaizen training," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 189-206.
    15. Kilian Huber & Volker Lindenthal & Fabian Waldinger, 2021. "Discrimination, Managers, and Firm Performance: Evidence from “Aryanizations” in Nazi Germany," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(9), pages 2455-2503.
    16. Daniela Scur & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen & Renata Lemos & Nicholas Bloom, 2021. "The World Management Survey at 18: lessons and the way forward," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 231-258.
    17. Stefan Dimitriadis & Rembrand Koning, 2022. "Social Skills Improve Business Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial with Entrepreneurs in Togo," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8635-8657, December.
    18. Scur, Daniela & Lemos, Renata, 2019. "The ties that bind: implicit contracts and management practices in family-run firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 13794, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Mckenzie,David J., 2020. "Small Business Training to Improve Management Practices in Developing Countries: Reassessingthe Evidence for 'Training Doesn’t Work'," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9408, The World Bank.
    20. Timothy DeStefano & Richard Kneller & Jonathan Timmis, 2026. "Strategic Asset Importance and the Adoption of Data-Driven Management Practices," CESifo Working Paper Series 12930, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eoe:escoed:escoe-dp-2023-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Communications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escoeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.