IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Importance of Firm Heterogeneity for Exports Policy Design in Turkey: Implications for 500 Billion $ Exports Target for 2023

Listed author(s):
  • A. Emre AKEL

The main objective of this paper is to present how firm heterogeneity influenced Turkey's exports during 2003-2012 and why Turkey's exports would be better off if Turkey's exports policies took into account the differences in structure of its exporters. Using firm-product-country level data, this study suggests a new approach to decompose exports, which can be considered as an extension of Amurgo-Pacheco and Pierola (2008), focusing on the "decomposition of exports in each year", rather than the common approach that focuses on the "decomposition of growth of exports" as suggested by Eaton et al (2007). In addition, a number of definitions such as "Exporters Portfolio of a Country", "Product and Market Portfolios of a Firm", "N-Year Survivors" and "Last-Time Exporters" are introduced. Using these definitions, this study offers its own perspective for product and market diversification, survival rate of exporters, firm entries and exits, as well as extensive and intensive margins of exports; while providing results that take into account the heterogeneous structure of the exporters. According to the results, between 2003 and 2012, 140,678 different firms exported from Turkey. Each year, on average, 97% of the exporters were SMEs, while micro-sized exporters constituted 53% of total exporters. Although an average Turkish exporter exported 10.9 products to 4.4 markets in 2012, an average micro-sized exporter exported 9 products to 2.9 markets, while an average large-sized exporter exported 28.5 products to 15.8 markets. Almost all of the new exporters and last-time exporters were small-sized or micro-sized firms, while contribution of new firms to Turkey's exports was only around 3.8% each year. 81% of Turkey's exports in each year were a result of exports in intensive margin, while 12.5% were a result of market diversification and 8% were thanks to product diversification. 80% of market diversification and 88% of product diversification in each year were realized by SMEs, while average market and product portfolios of an average SME were significantly smaller than an average large-sized exporter. In addition, there were 8789 10-year survivors that constituted almost 67% of Turkey's exports in each year, while having significantly larger market and product portfolios compared to an average exporter, performing better with respect to all of the metrics. Despite the heterogeneous structure of Turkey's exporters, Turkey's exports policies have a uniform structure. Therefore, there is a significant opportunity for increasing efficiency of Turkey's exports policies taking into account this phenomenon. . .

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/ECOMOD-2014-FINAL.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by EcoMod in its series EcoMod2014 with number 7126.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 03 Jul 2014
Handle: RePEc:ekd:006356:7126
Contact details of provider: Postal:
351 Pleasant Street, #357, Northampton MA 01060-3900 USA

Phone: +1 413 586 3203
Fax: +1 413 517 0900
Web page: http://www.ecomod.net

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as
in new window


  1. Andrew B. Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2011. "Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 126(3), pages 1271-1318.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:006356:7126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theresa Leary)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.