IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002672/4405.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

International Property Rights and Climate Policy: Implications on the Diffusion of Climate-Friendly Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Voigt
  • Enrica De Cian
  • Elena Verdolini
  • Michael Schymura

Abstract

Technological change has been attributed an important role in reducing the costs associated to climate change mitigation through GHG emission reductions. The adoption and deployment of low-carbon and environmentally friendly technologies has been at the center stage of climate negotiations. Technology transfer from developed to developing countries can facilitate access to affordable and appropriate emission-reducing technologies. Deployment of climate friendly technologies will result both in lower greenhouse gas emissions and in more economic development, increasing the likelihood that developing countries accept binding reduction targets. Despite the importance attributed to technological innovation and transfer within climate negotiations, still too little is known about the dynamics of technological change, its drivers, and the resulting economic and environmental performance. While a number of recent contributions in the literature analyze technology innovation and transfer in energy and climate-friendly technologies, they are characterized by a number of important limitations. Most analyses concentrate on demand determinants of innovation. Conversely, only a few point to the role of other drivers, such as knowledge stocks, the importance of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regimes or the role of environmental policy. This is mostly due to data availability issues and with the challenges of building appropriate proxies to measure these determinants. Therefore, this paper aims at bridging this gap and examining the impact of these drivers on the diffusion of selected climate-friendly technologies such as renewable energy sources.For the analysis we employ country level panel data using econometric methods. An important step is the development of indicators representing the stringency of environmental and climate policy as well as the strength of IPR regimes. In order to construct a policy indicator, comprehensive data on renewable energy policies, energy efficiency policies and climate change policies from the IEA Policies and Measures Databases are collected. These data provide detailed information on the technologies the specific policy is aimed at as well as on indicators such as the policy type and the jurisdiction, i.e. whether the policy is implemented on a national, regional or municipal level. Regarding the IPR indicator we rely on two available proxies: the Patent Right Index developed by Ginarte and Park (1997, Research Policy) and updated by Park (2008, Research Policy), and the quality index for patent systems developed by Saint-Georges and van Pottelsberghe (2011, CEPR Discussion Paper 8440). Whereas the former index mainly concentrates on the strength of patent protection, the latter puts more emphasis on the quality of the patent system. Therefore, we construct a composition of these proxies to combine the advantages of both and to account for the strength of IPR regimes as well as their quality in terms of inventiveness conditions and transparency and certainty. These indicators together with variables such as energy investment, trade in energy and emission intensive sectors, and foreign direct investments, serve as explanatory variables to study the impact on technology diffusion measured by foreign patent applications.Preliminary results show a positive influence of climate and environmental policy stringency in developing countries on the diffusion of climate-friendly technologies from developed to developing countries. Furthermore, also a higher policy stringency in developed countries increases technology diffusion from developed to developing regions, though to a lesser extent. The reason for this outcome could be that stricter policies induce a higher innovation level for climate-friendly technologies in developed regions which in turn leads to a market expansion for those technologies and thus exports (of patent applications) to developing regions increase. Moreover, preliminary results on the influence of the IPR regime show a positive impact on diffusion from developed to developing regions as long as the IPR regime in the developing country increases. Inventors benefit from stricter patent protection in developing regions and hence apply for patents abroad inducing technology transfer. Conversely, if IPR protection is high in developed regions and low in developing regions, there is no incentive to apply for patents in the latter regions which attenuates technology transfer in terms of foreign patent applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Voigt & Enrica De Cian & Elena Verdolini & Michael Schymura, 2012. "International Property Rights and Climate Policy: Implications on the Diffusion of Climate-Friendly Technologies," EcoMod2012 4405, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Voigt_EcoMod2012_IPR_ClimatePolicies.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hãœbler, Michael & Keller, Andreas, 2010. "Energy savings via FDI? Empirical evidence from developing countries," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 59-80, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adom, Philip Kofi, 2015. "Business cycle and economic-wide energy intensity: The implications for energy conservation policy in Algeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 334-350.
    2. Hübler, Michael, 2011. "Technology diffusion under contraction and convergence: A CGE analysis of China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 131-142, January.
    3. Muhammad Shahbaz & Amatul Razzaq Chaudhary & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, 2020. "Is energy consumption sensitive to foreign capital inflows and currency devaluation in Pakistan?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(52), pages 5641-5658, June.
    4. Fuzhong Chen & Guohai Jiang & Getachew Magnar Kitila, 2021. "Trade Openness and CO 2 Emissions: The Heterogeneous and Mediating Effects for the Belt and Road Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Adom, Philip Kofi & Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin, 2016. "What drives the energy saving role of FDI and industrialization in East Africa?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 925-942.
    6. Sujan Chandra Paul & Md. Harun Or Rosid & Md. Jamil Sharif & Anjuman Ara Rajonee, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment and CO2, CH4, N2O, Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Cross Country Study," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 97-104.
    7. Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin & Klege, Rebecca A. & Adom, Philip K. & Amoah, Anthony & Hagan, Edmond, 2018. "Unveiling the energy saving role of banking performance in Sub-Sahara Africa," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 828-842.
    8. Sapkota, Pratikshya & Bastola, Umesh, 2017. "Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 206-212.
    9. Herrerias, M.J. & Cuadros, A. & Luo, D., 2016. "Foreign versus indigenous innovation and energy intensity: Further research across Chinese regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1374-1384.
    10. Cenjie Liu & Chunbo Ma & Rui Xie, 2020. "Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 741-768, April.
    11. Karanfil, Fatih & Omgba, Luc Désiré, 2019. "Do the IMF’s structural adjustment programs help reduce energy consumption and carbon intensity? Evidence from developing countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 312-323.
    12. Hübler, Michael & Pothen, Frank, 2013. "The optimal tariff in the presence of trade-induced productivity gains," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-103, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Muntasir Murshed & Mohamed Elheddad & Rizwan Ahmed & Mohga Bassim & Ei Thuzar Than, 2022. "Foreign Direct Investments, Renewable Electricity Output, and Ecological Footprints: Do Financial Globalization Facilitate Renewable Energy Transition and Environmental Welfare in Bangladesh?," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(1), pages 33-78, March.
    14. Richard Perkins & Eric Neumayer, 2009. "How do domestic attributes affect international spillovers of CO2-efficiency?," GRI Working Papers 8, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    15. Islam, Md. Monirul & Irfan, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1130-1149.
    16. Alexander Glas & Michael H�bler & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2016. "Catching up of emerging economies: the role of capital goods imports, FDI inflows, domestic investment and absorptive capacity," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 117-120, February.
    17. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Han, Cuicui & Wang, Mengyang & Song, Jinbo & Liao, Xianchun, 2020. "Influence of FDI quality on energy efficiency in China based on seemingly unrelated regression method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Angelo Antoci & Paolo Russu & Elisa Ticci, 2011. "Investement inflows and sustainable development in a natural resource-dependent economy," Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID) University of Siena 0311, Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID), University of Siena.
    19. Hamdi, Helmi & Sbia, Rashid & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2014. "The nexus between electricity consumption and economic growth in Bahrain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 227-237.
    20. Croutzet, Alexandre & Dabbous, Amal, 2021. "Do FinTech trigger renewable energy use? Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1608-1617.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.