IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eiq/eileqs/44.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The democratic crisis of capitalism: Reflections on political and economic modernity in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Wagner

Abstract

Are 'modern societies' necessarily democratic societies and capitalist (or: market) societies? This is what most of the social sciences of the post-Second World War period have assumed, while only some strands of critical, often Marx-inspired approaches contested this connection. This essay briefly reconsiders the link between democracy and capitalism both in theoretical and historical terms to then advance a hypothesis about the current constellation of political and economic modernity which seems to be marked by a paradox. On the one hand, both democracy, apparently spreading through 'waves of democratization', and capitalism, as the outcome of economic globalization, seem to be without alternative. On the other hand, current capitalism is highly crisis-ridden and democracy, at least in Europe, witnesses strong signs of disaffection. In this light, the essay proposes to see the current constellation as the outcome of a democratic crisis of capitalism during the 1970s. The reasoning proceeds in five steps. First, we will reconsider theories that have assumed that there is a strong conceptual connection between democracy and capitalism. Secondly, we will briefly review the history of the relation between modern capitalism and modern democracy from their beginnings until the 1970s to refine the ideas about such conceptual link. These two steps, thirdly, will allow for an interim conclusion to understand the double crisis of the 1970s, of both capitalism and democracy, an understanding that opens the path to two observations – the fourth and fifth steps – on the current condition of global capitalism and the alleged global movement of democratisation. First, the developments of the past four decades can be seen as a transformation of capitalism in reaction to democratic demands. Extrapolating from this insight, second, one may ask whether there is not a basic tension between economic and political modernity, given the evident difficulty of keeping political citizenship connected to socio-economic citizenship.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Wagner, 2011. "The democratic crisis of capitalism: Reflections on political and economic modernity in Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 44, European Institute, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:eiq:eileqs:44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LEQS/LEQSPaper44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eve Chiapello & Luc Boltanski, 1999. "Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme," Post-Print hal-00680085, HAL.
    2. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226731445 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan Costa-i-Font, 2012. "Fiscal Federalism and European Health System Decentralization: A Perspective," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    2. José Joaquín Brunner, 2018. "Sobre las contradicciones culturales del liberalismo y sus malestares," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(150), pages 161-233.
    3. Richard Hyman, 2011. "Trade Unions, Lisbon and Europe 2020: From Dream to Nightmare," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    4. Richard Hyman, 2011. "Trade Unions, Lisbon and Europe 2020: From Dream to Nightmare," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 45, European Institute, LSE.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    2. Bernard Billaudot, 2009. "L'ambivalence de la RSE. L'illusion de la coordination par le contrat," Post-Print halshs-00515194, HAL.
    3. Rachid Bagaoui, 2021. "Le management et la mobilisation des travailleurs : de l’illusio aux désillusions," Post-Print hal-03680299, HAL.
    4. Yoann Verger, 2015. "Sraffa and ecological economics: review of the literature," Working Papers hal-01182894, HAL.
    5. Robert Boyer, 2007. "Growth strategies and poverty reduction: the institutional complementarity hypothesis," Working Papers halshs-00587703, HAL.
    6. Pierre Pech & Cédissia About & Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste & Phlippe Jacob & Laurent Simon, 2017. "Analyse des processus de renaturation en tissu urbain dense en relation avec des infrastructures linéaires de transport urbaines et leurs emprises : le cas de la Métropole du Grand Paris," Working Papers halshs-01802392, HAL.
    7. Fabien Jakob, 2022. "Collective action towards a greener order of worth: protecting a common cultural and natural heritage," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 625-642, June.
    8. Thomas Amossé & Gaëtan Flocco & Josette Lefèvre & Jean-Marie Pernot & Héloïse Petit & Frédéric Rey & Michèle Tallard & Carole Tuchszirer & Catherine Vincent, 2012. "Les organisations patronales. Continuités et mutations des formes de représentation du patronat," Working Papers hal-00684075, HAL.
    9. Jean-Pierre Bréchet & Hélène Journé-Michel & Nathalie Schieb-Bienfait, 2008. "Figures de la conception et de l’innovation dans l’artisanat," Post-Print hal-01417042, HAL.
    10. Daniel Innerarity, 2013. "A Concept of the Global to Conceive Global Governance. Four Metaphorical Proposals," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 6, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    11. Tuomas Ylä-Anttila & Eeva Luhtakallio, 2016. "Justifications Analysis: Understanding Moral Evaluations in Public Debates," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Isabela dos Santos Paes & Jean-Luc Moriceau & Géraldine Guérillot & Julien Billion, 2014. "Entrepreneur et salarié : parcours et identités dans le portage salarial," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02394355, HAL.
    13. Nicolas da Silva & Jean-Paul Domin, 2016. "Assurance et métrologie : le grand tournant de la médecine capitaliste," Post-Print hal-02077563, HAL.
    14. David Vallat, 2016. "An Alternative to State-Market Dualism: The Sharing Economy. Practical and Epistemological Questions," Post-Print halshs-01331107, HAL.
    15. Sibylle Bui & Ionara Costa & Olivier De Schutter & Tom Dedeurwaerdere & Marek Hudon & Marlene Feyereisen, 2019. "Systemic ethics and inclusive governance: two key prerequisites for sustainability transitions of agri-food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 277-288, June.
    16. Fabrice Burlot & Julien Pierre & Lilian Pichot, 2010. "Le sport en entreprise au service des pratiques managériales," Post-Print hal-01727049, HAL.
    17. Helge Peukert, 2002. "Schumpeter'S "Lost" Seventh Chapter: A Critical Overview," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1-2), pages 79-89.
    18. Céline Bessière & Christophe Giraud & Nicolas Renahy, 2008. "Introduction - Famille, travail, école et agriculture," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 88(3), pages 5-19.
    19. Franck Aggeri, 2017. "How can performativity contribute to management and organization research? Theoretical perspectives and analytical framework [Qu'est-ce que la performativité peut apporter aux recherches en managem," Post-Print hal-01609172, HAL.
    20. Maria da Conceição Cerdeira & Ilona Kovács, 2008. "Job quality in Europe: the North-South divide," Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, vol. 4(4), pages 21-47, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eiq:eileqs:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katjana Gattermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eilseuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.