IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/8017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When smaller families look contagious: a spatial look at the French fertility decline using an agent-based simulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Tommy E. Murphy

    (University of Bocconi)

  • Sandra González-Bailón

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

"Despite some disagreements about specific timing, it is now widely accepted that France was the first country in Europe to experience a systematic fall in birth rates. At least two further features, however, make the French case particularly noteworthy: how long it took and how persis- tent internal heterogeneity was throughout. Fertility rates evolved following quite a distinctive geographical pattern, where two clear areas of low fertility (the Seine valley and the Aquitaine re- gion) appeared to spread their influence while two ‘islands’ of high fertility (Bretagne and the Mas- sif Central) kept shrinking until they more or less disappeared in the early 1900s. Standard quanti- tative analyses have shed light into some of the factors driving this dynamic, but to better under- stand the mechanisms underlying this apparent diffusion we need other tools. In an attempt to pro- vide a sensible explanation of this salient feature, we build an agent-based simulation model [Ax- elrod, 1997, 2005; Arthur, 2005; Hedström, 2005; Gilbert, 2008; Gilbert and Troitzsch, 2005; Tes- fatsion, 2005] which incorporates both historical data on population characteristics and spatial in- formation on the geography of France, and assess how different behavioural assumptions on social interaction might have affected variations in the patterns followed by fertility rates. In doing so we incorporate two components normally neglected in the literature. On the one hand, we introduce the role of social influence in fertility decisions [e.g. Kohler, 2001]. On the other, we assess the ef- fect of the French Revolution. Its simultaneity with the onset of the decline is quite suggestive al- ready, but an increasing literature is now pointing towards a more regular connection between so- cial upheavals and fertility decline [Binion, 2001; Caldwell, 2004; Bailey, 2006]. We build upon these studies and introduce the Revolution in the model as a heterogeneous, exogenous shock to the population. In the model, individuals living in more ‘progressive’ départements are more likely to be affected by a shock that make them want to have fewer children, and we use département level quantitative data on the Ecclesiastical Oath of loyalty to the Revolution of 1791 [Tackett, 1986] to proxy for the percentage of agents switching to this new status. Preliminary results suggest that both social influence and the revolution might partly explain the particular evolution of fertility rates in France. The model performs relatively well at micro level, suggesting our choice of the proxy for the ‘modernisation factor’ might have been a good one. Although failing to fully per- ceive the impact on those départements leading the decline, simulated fertility trends –and in many cases levels– follow actual patterns in intermediate areas, and in those that lagged behind in the demographic transition. Overall, the model provides new insights into an old problem and serves as a benchmark to assess alternative behavioural hypotheses."

Suggested Citation

  • Tommy E. Murphy & Sandra González-Bailón, 2008. "When smaller families look contagious: a spatial look at the French fertility decline using an agent-based simulation model," Working Papers 8017, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:8017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/712ab883-34de-490b-b235-c308727b02ea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tommy Murphy, 2015. "Old habits die hard (sometimes)," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 177-222, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Daudin & Raphaël Franck & Hillel Rapoport, 2016. "The cultural diffusion of the fertility transition: evidence from internal migration in 19 th century France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01321952, HAL.
    2. Paul David & S. Ryan Johansson & Andrea Pozzi, 2010. "The Demography of an Early Mortality Transition: Life Expectancy, Survival and Mortality Rates for Britain's Royals, 1500-1799," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _083, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    3. Paul A. David & S. Ryan Johansson & Andrea Pozzi, 2010. "The Demography of an Early Mortality Transition: Life Expectancy, Survival and Mortality Rates for Britain's Royals, 1500-1799," Oxford University Economic and Social History Series _083, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen Thang Dao & Julio Dávila & Angela Greulich, 2021. "The education gender gap and the demographic transition in developing countries," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 431-474, April.
    2. Bhattacharya, Joydeep & Chakraborty, Shankha & Kim, Minkyong, 2023. "Child survival and contraception choice: Theory and evidence," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Lecce, Giampaolo & Ogliari, Laura & Squicciarini, Mara P., 2021. "Birth and migration of scientists: Does religiosity matter? Evidence from 19th-century France," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 274-289.
    4. Ager, Philipp & Brueckner, Markus & Herz, Benedikt, 2017. "Structural Change and the Fertility Transition in the American South," Discussion Papers on Economics 6/2017, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    5. Ole E. Barndorff‐Nielsen & Neil Shephard, 2002. "Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 253-280, May.
    6. Fabian Siuda & Uwe Sunde, 2021. "Disease and demographic development: the legacy of the plague," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Guillaume Daudin & Raphaël Franck & Hillel Rapoport, 2016. "The cultural diffusion of the fertility transition: evidence from internal migration in 19 th century France," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01321952, HAL.
    8. repec:oxf:wpaper:71.2 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Claude Diebolt & Audrey-Rose Menard & Faustine Perrin, 2016. "Behind the Fertility-Education Nexus: What Triggered the French Development Process?," Working Papers 03-16, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    10. Alberto Basso, 2015. "Does Democracy Foster the Fertility Transition?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 459-474, November.
    11. Claude Diebolt & Tapas Mishra & Faustine Perrin, 2019. "Gender Equality as an Enforcer of Individuals’ Choice between Education and Fertility: Evidence from 19th Century France," Working Papers 12-19, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    12. Claude Diebolt & Tapas Mishra & Faustine Perrin, 2015. "Did Gender-Bias Matter in the Quantity- Quality Trade-off in the 19th Century France ?," Working Papers of BETA 2015-28, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Nico Voigtl?nder & Hans-Joachim Voth, 2013. "How the West "Invented" Fertility Restriction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2227-2264, October.
    14. Diebolt, Claude & Mishra, Tapas & Perrin, Faustine, 2021. "Gender empowerment as an enforcer of individuals’ choice between education and fertility: Evidence from 19th century France," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 408-438.
    15. Court Victor & Florent Mc Isaac, 2019. "A Representation of the World Population Dynamics for Integrated Assessment Models," Working Papers hal-03192539, HAL.
    16. de la Croix, David & Perrin, Faustine, 2018. "How far can economic incentives explain the French fertility and education transition?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 221-245.
    17. Yu Bai & Yanjun Li & Pak Hung Lam, 2023. "Quantity-quality trade-off in Northeast China during the Qing dynasty," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 1657-1694, July.
    18. Philip DeCicca & Harry Krashinsky, 2023. "The effect of education on overall fertility," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 471-503, January.
    19. Vincent Bignon & Cecilia García-Peñalosa, 2016. "Protectionism and the Education-Fertility Trade-off in Late 19th Century France," Working Papers halshs-01264614, HAL.
    20. Thomas Baudin & David de la Croix, 2023. "The Emergence of the Child Quantity-Quality Tradeoff - insights from early modern academics," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2023015, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    21. Fernihough, Alan, 2017. "Less is More? The child quantity-quality trade-off in early 20th century England and Wales," QUCEH Working Paper Series 2017-07, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic history; demographic history (Europe pre-1913); France; demographic economics; fertility; simulation models (agent-based); diffusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N33 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - Europe: Pre-1913
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:8017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.