IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/35979.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU commission and national governments as partners: EC regulatory expansion in telecommunications 1979-2000

Author

Listed:
  • Thatcher, Mark

Abstract

Explicitly or implicitly, general models of European integration claim that EC regulatory expansion involves a struggle for power between Commission and national governments. The Commission is seen as a policy entrepreneur, taking the initiative to drive forward integration (Sandholtz and Zysman 1989). It seeks regulatory expansion due to constraints on its expenditure (Majone 1996, ch4). Neo-functionalists emphasise the Commission's ability to expand its role against the wishes of governments, thanks to the support of transnational groups and the European Court of Justice (Sandholtz and Stone Sweet 1998; Stone-Sweet and Burrell 1998). Intergovernmentalists differ in their conclusions about the distribution of power (arguing that the Commission is generally unable to impose its preferences on member states), rather than the assumption that Commission and national governments are in conflictual competition with each other for power (Moravcsik 1998, 1999)...

Suggested Citation

  • Thatcher, Mark, 2001. "The EU commission and national governments as partners: EC regulatory expansion in telecommunications 1979-2000," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35979, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:35979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35979/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uschi Koebberling, 1993. "The Limits of National Governance," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 49-82, December.
    2. Delcourt, Bernard, 1991. "EC decisions and directives on information technology and telecommunications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 15-21, February.
    3. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1999. "A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(2), pages 267-306, April.
    4. Volker Schneider & Godefroy Dang‐Nguyen & Raymund Wrle, 1994. "Corporate Actor Networks in European Policy‐Making: Harmonizing Telecommunications Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 473-498, December.
    5. Schmidt, Susanne K., 1996. "Sterile Debates and Dubious Generalisations: European Integration Theory Tested by Telecommunications and Electricity," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 233-271, September.
    6. Schmidt, Susanne K., 1991. "Taking the long road to liberalization : Telecommunications reform in the Federal Republic of Germany," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 209-222, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheung, Zeerim & Aalto, Eero & Nevalainen, Pasi, 2020. "Institutional Logics and the Internationalization of a State-Owned Enterprise: Evaluation of International Venture Opportunities by Telecom Finland 1987–1998," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    2. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8602 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Cornelia Woll, 2007. "From National Champions to Global Players? Lobbying by Dominant Providers during the WTO's Basic Telecom Negotiations," Post-Print hal-00972815, HAL.
    4. Quaglione, Davide & Matteucci, Nicola & Furia, Donatella & Marra, Alessandro & Pozzi, Cesare, 2020. "Are mobile and fixed broadband substitutes or complements? New empirical evidence from Italy and implications for the digital divide policies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade. Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01065571, HAL.
    6. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8527 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Calzada, Joan & Diaz-Serrano, Luis, 2023. "Conflicting national policies: The creation of the euro and the rebalancing of telecommunications prices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    9. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8602 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cornelia Woll, 2007. "From National Champions to Global Players? Lobbying by Dominant Providers during the WTO's Basic Telecom Negotiations," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972815, HAL.
    11. Cornelia Woll, 2005. "Learning to Act on World Trade. Preference Formation of Large Firms in the United States and the European Union," Working Papers hal-01065571, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedi Revecca & Sarri Katerina, 2019. "From the ‘Small but Smart State’ to the ‘Small and Entrepreneurial State’: Introducing a Framework for Effective Small State Strategies within the EU and Beyond," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 3-19, June.
    2. Arndt Wonka & Frank R Baumgartner & Christine Mahoney & Joost Berkhout, 2010. "Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 463-476, September.
    3. David L. Ellison & Attila Hugyecz, 2008. "An initial investigation of the EU's 2020 climate change package and its potential domestic impact," IWE Working Papers 186, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Wangsik Kim, 2008. "The Context of EU Telecommunications Reform Process: The Cases of Britain and Germany," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 117-136, May.
    5. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    6. Osei-Owusu, Alexander, 2015. "The Analysis of the Ghana Telecom Industry," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127172, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Aynsley Kellow, 2012. "Multi-level and multi-arena governance: the limits of integration and the possibilities of forum shopping," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 327-342, November.
    8. Peter Humphreys & Seamus Simpson, 2008. "Globalization, the 'Competition' State and the Rise of the 'Regulatory' State in European Telecommunications," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46, pages 849-874, September.
    9. Fabio Franchino & Camilla Mariotto, 2013. "Explaining negotiations in the conciliation committee," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 345-365, September.
    10. Fuchs, Gerhard, 1993. "ISDN: The telecommunications highway for Europe after 1992 or Paving a dead end street?: The politics of pan-european telecommunications network development," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Perri 6 & Eva Heims & Martha Prevezer, 2023. "How did international economic regulation survive the last period of deglobalization?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 272-289, January.
    12. Tosun, Jale & Solorio, Israel, 2011. "Exploring the Energy-Environment Relationship in the EU: Perspectives and Challenges for Theorizing and Empirical Analysis," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, November.
    13. Mayer, Sebastian, 2006. "TACIS and EU's security of energy supply: the Commission as a strategic actor in external relations," TranState Working Papers 46, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    14. Susanne K. Schmidt, 2000. "Only an Agenda Setter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 37-61, February.
    15. Jon Birger Skjærseth, 2017. "The European Commission’s Shifting Climate Leadership," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(2), pages 84-104, May.
    16. David L. Ellison, 2005. "Divide and conquer: the EU enlargement's successful conclusion?," IWE Working Papers 161, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    17. Suzuki, Sanae, 2014. "Chairship system and decision making by consensus in international agreements : the case of ASEAN," IDE Discussion Papers 471, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    18. Werle, Raymund, 2001. "Standards in the International Telecommunications Regime," Discussion Paper Series 26265, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    19. Feick, Jürgen, 2002. "Regulatory Europeanization, national autonomy and regulatory effectiveness: Marketing authorization for pharmaceuticals," MPIfG Discussion Paper 02/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Theodore Baird, 2017. "Non-State Actors and the New Intergovernmentalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1192-1202, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:35979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.