IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/129489.html

Re-innovation nation: the political economy of technology transfer policy in post-WTO China

Author

Listed:
  • Minnich, John

Abstract

This article examines China’s efforts to accelerate its economic rise using technology absorption policies, or measures that condition foreign market access on technology transfers to domestic firms. I argue bureaucratic fragmentation and China’s position in global value chains (GVCs) constrain its bargaining power over foreign investors, limiting the use of tech absorption policies even in highly strategic industries such as semiconductors. Case studies and analysis of a new industry-level dataset from 1995 to 2015 suggest centralizing reforms facilitated increased use of tech absorption policies in strategic industries over time. However, China’s reliance on foreign firms to drive export growth and associated employment undercut tech absorption efforts in strategic industries in which it occupied an intermediate position in GVCs. My findings show how regulatory institutions and GVCs shape the political economy of bargaining over technology transfer between states and firms and how position in production networks influenced the strategic choices behind China’s rise.

Suggested Citation

  • Minnich, John, 2026. "Re-innovation nation: the political economy of technology transfer policy in post-WTO China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129489, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129489/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pincus, J J, 1975. "Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(4), pages 757-778, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin, Sheng, 2000. "The Political Economy of Trade Policy in China," Working Papers 10/2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    2. Richard Pomfret, 2003. "Trade and Exchange Rate Policies in Formerly Centrally Planned Economies," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 585-612, April.
    3. John Tressler, 1978. "Political Goods and Trade Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 22(1), pages 51-59, March.
    4. Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Maria Petrova & Ruben Enikolopov, 2008. "The Dracula effect: voter information and trade policy," Economics Working Papers 1296, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2020.
    5. Glismann, Hans H. & Spinanger, Dean, 1984. "Clothing the world efficiently: The MFA and consumers," Kiel Working Papers 208, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    6. repec:bge:wpaper:514 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Panagariya, Arvind & Rodrik, Dani, 1993. "Political-Economy Arguments for a Uniform Tariff," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 34(3), pages 685-703, August.
    8. John Conybeare, 1978. "Public Policy and the Australian Tariff Structure," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 3(1), pages 49-63, April.
    9. Robert Pahre, 1998. "Reactions and Reciprocity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(4), pages 467-492, August.
    10. Robert C. Feenstra & Jagdish N. Bhagwati, 1982. "Tariff Seeking and the Efficient Tariff," NBER Chapters, in: Import Competition and Response, pages 245-262, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Wen Li Cheng & Meng-Chun Liu & Xiaokai Yang, 2005. "A Ricardian Model With Endogenous Comparative Advantage And Endogenous Trade Policy Regimes," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Inframarginal Approach To Trade Theory, chapter 7, pages 109-130, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Grossman, Gene M. & Helpman, Elhanan, 1996. "Rent dissipation, free riding, and trade policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 795-803, April.
    13. Donald Feaver & Kenneth Wilson, 1998. "Unlocking Australia's Contingent Protection Black Box," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(224), pages 62-73, March.
    14. Emile van Ommeren & Arlo Poletti & Dirk De Bièvre, 2021. "The European Union and the political economy of enforcing international trade rules," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 377-400, September.
    15. Rodrik, Dani, 1994. "What does the Political Economy Literature on Trade Policy (Not) Tell Us That We Ought to Know?," CEPR Discussion Papers 1039, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Kudo, Tomoshige & Matsubara, Fumitaka & Katsura, Shigetoshi, 1978. "Magnetic properties and distribution of thermal averages of spins in the one-dimensional random mixture of Ising spins of S = 1 and12," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 255-272.
    17. Friedrich Schneider & Jörg Naumann, 1982. "Interest groups in democracies — How influential are they?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 281-303, January.
    18. Chen, Baizhu & Feng, Yi, 2001. "Openness and trade policy in China: an industrial analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 323-341.
    19. Thorsten Drautzburg & Igor Livshits & Mark L. J. Wright, 2022. "Polarized Contributions but Convergent Agendas," Working Papers 22-29, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    20. John Conybeare, 1984. "Politicians and protection: Tariffs and elections in Australia," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 203-209, January.
    21. Don P. Clark & Donald Bruce, 2006. "Who Bears The Burden Of U.S. Nontariff Measures?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(2), pages 274-286, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:129489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.