IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v74y1998i224p62-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking Australia's Contingent Protection Black Box

Author

Listed:
  • Feaver, Donald
  • Wilson, Kenneth

Abstract

In this paper, the material injury outcome decisions of the Australian regulatory authority (the Anti-Dumping Authority) are analyzed in order to determine which factors are influential in determining outcome decisions. The paper tests hypotheses concerning how the Australian authorities decide whether an Australian industry has suffered material injury as required under the relevant Australian legislation and the GATT/WTO obligations. The paper concludes that, even though the Australian authorities follow a procedurally correct and GATT-consistent approach, there is nevertheless some evidence of protectionist bias in favor of domestic industries. Copyright 1998 by The Economic Society of Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Feaver, Donald & Wilson, Kenneth, 1998. "Unlocking Australia's Contingent Protection Black Box," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(224), pages 62-73, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:74:y:1998:i:224:p:62-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kara M. Reynolds, 2009. "From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(5), pages 969-985, November.
    2. Nelson, Douglas, 2006. "The political economy of antidumping: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 554-590, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:74:y:1998:i:224:p:62-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.