IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/123212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economics of TransMilenio, a mass transit system for Bogota

Author

Listed:
  • Echeverry, Juan Carlos
  • Ibáñez, Ana María
  • Moya, Andrés
  • Hillon, Luis Carlos

Abstract

By the end of the 1990s, inefficiency, excess supply and low service quality characterized the mass transit system of Bogotá. The average travel time to work was one hour and ten minutes, obsolete buses provided public transport, traffic generated 70 percent of air pollution and there were frequent traffic accidents. To address all of these issues, the municipal and national governments designed and put in place a new mass transit system named TransMilenio (TM), which came into operation in January 2001. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Bogotá´s mass transit system before and after TM, study the political economy of its adoption process and conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of the first phase of the system. The new transit system is a hybrid model that combines public planning of the network structure, route tendering conditions, regulation and supervision, as well as private operation of the separated functions of revenue collection and transport service. The adoption of this new model needed to resolve delicate political economy issues that characterized private transport systems in many developing countries. The new organization had a sizeable impact on TM users´ by improving traveling conditions significantly. In addition, congestion, pollution and traffic accidents plummeted in TM corridors. However, the type of transition adopted for the remaining transport corridors not covered by TM caused unforeseen negative spillovers, as a consequence of slow scrapping rates and bus and routes relocation. Consequently, although the CBA for the first phase of the corridors covered by TM is positive, once these additional measures are taken into consideration, the net effect is negative due primarily to increases in travel time for passengers using the traditional transport system. In order to minimize the negative spillovers during the full implementation of TM, expected to last until 2015, integration of the traditional and new systems should be carried on, and
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Echeverry, Juan Carlos & Ibáñez, Ana María & Moya, Andrés & Hillon, Luis Carlos, 2005. "The economics of TransMilenio, a mass transit system for Bogota," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123212, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/123212/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David, Quentin & Foucart, Renaud, 2014. "Modal choice and optimal congestion," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 12-20.
    2. Bel, Germà & Holst, Maximilian, 2018. "Evaluation of the impact of Bus Rapid Transit on air pollution in Mexico City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 209-220.
    3. Combs, Tabitha S. & Rodríguez, Daniel A., 2014. "Joint impacts of Bus Rapid Transit and urban form on vehicle ownership: New evidence from a quasi-longitudinal analysis in Bogotá, Colombia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 272-285.
    4. Tien Dung Khong & Yen Dan Tong & Le Thai Hanh Bui, 2023. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and Model Preference of Public Transportation in Can Tho City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Gómez-Lobo, Andrés, 2020. "Transit reforms in intermediate cities of Colombia: An ex-post evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 349-364.
    6. Carlos Alberto Medina & Carlos Eduardo V�lez, 2012. "Aglomeración económica y congestión vial: los perjuicios por racionamiento del tráfico vehicular," Documentos de trabajo 17696, Escuela de Gobierno - Universidad de los Andes.
    7. Llanto, Gilberto M. & Gerochi, Hope, 2017. "Competition for the Market: A Policy Framework for Improving Bus Operation along EDSA," Discussion Papers DP 2017-10, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    8. Carlos Alberto Medina & Carlos Eduardo V�lez, 2011. "Aglomeraci�n econ�mica y congesti�n vial: los perjuicios por racionamiento del tr�fico vehicular," Borradores de Economia 9085, Banco de la Republica.
    9. Heres, David R. & Jack, Darby & Salon, Deborah, 2013. "Do Public Transit Investments Promote Urban Economic Development? Evidence from Bogotá, Colombia," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8dg273pk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Carlos Alberto Medina & carlos Eduardo Vélez, 2011. "Aglomeración Económica y Congestión Vial: los Perjuicios por Racionamiento del Tráfico Vehicular," Borradores de Economia 678, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    11. Bueno Rezendede Castro, André & Ortega Sandoval, Abby Daniela & Odamtten, Genevieve, 2022. "Up around the bend? How transport poverty can lead to social exclusion in a low-income community in Lagos, Nigeria," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:123212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.