IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/115097.html

Evaluation of the NHS England evidence based interventions programme: a difference-in-difference analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Anderson, Michael
  • Molloy, Aoife
  • Maynou-Pujolras, Laia
  • Kyriopoulos, Ilias-Ioannis
  • Mcguire, Alistair
  • Mossialos, Elias

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The NHS England evidence-based interventions programme (EBI), launched in April 2019, is a novel nationally led initiative to encourage disinvestment in low value care. METHOD: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of this policy by using a difference-in-difference approach to compare changes in volume between January 2016 and February 2020 in a treatment group of low value procedures against a control group unaffected by the EBI programme during our period of analysis but subsequently identified as candidates for disinvestment. RESULTS: We found only small differences between the treatment and control group after implementation, with reductions in volumes in the treatment group 0.10% (95% CI 0.09% to 0.11%) smaller than in the control group (equivalent to 16 low value procedures per month). During the month of implementation, reductions in volumes in the treatment group were 0.05% (95% CI 0.03% to 0.06%) smaller than in the control group (equivalent to 7 low value procedures). Using triple difference estimators, we found that reductions in volumes were 0.35% (95% CI 0.26% to 0.44%) larger in NHS hospitals than independent sector providers (equivalent to 47 low value procedures per month). We found no significant differences between clinical commissioning groups that did or did not volunteer to be part of a demonstrator community to trial EBI guidance, but found reductions in volume were 0.06% (95% CI 0.04% to 0.08%) larger in clinical commissioning groups that posted a deficit in the financial year 2018/19 before implementation (equivalent to 4 low value procedures per month). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that the EBI programme did not accelerate disinvestment for procedures under its remit during our period of analysis. However, we find that financial and organisational factors may have had some influence on the degree of responsiveness to the EBI programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Michael & Molloy, Aoife & Maynou-Pujolras, Laia & Kyriopoulos, Ilias-Ioannis & Mcguire, Alistair & Mossialos, Elias, 2023. "Evaluation of the NHS England evidence based interventions programme: a difference-in-difference analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115097, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/115097/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Olden & Jarle Møen, 2022. "The triple difference estimator [Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 531-553.
    2. Zack Cooper & Stephen Gibbons & Simon Jones & Alistair McGuire, 2011. "Does Hospital Competition Save Lives? Evidence From The English NHS Patient Choice Reforms," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(554), pages 228-260, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Jay & Qin, Xuezheng & Li, Qian & Messina, Joseph P. & Delamater, Paul L., 2015. "Does hospital competition improve health care delivery in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 179-199.
    2. He, Chengxu & Liang, Yinhe & Wang, Gefei, 2025. "Reshaping Migrant-Native Health Disparities: evidence from the hukou reform in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Brekke, Kurt R. & Canta, Chiara & Siciliani, Luigi & Straume, Odd Rune, 2021. "Hospital competition in a national health service: Evidence from a patient choice reform," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Lastauskas, Povilas & Proškutė, Aurelija & Žaldokas, Alminas, 2023. "How do firms adjust when trade stops?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 287-307.
    5. Kurt R. Brekke & Luigi Siciliani & Odd Rune Straume, 2013. "Hospital Mergers: A Spatial Competition Approach," NIPE Working Papers 04/2013, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    6. Lorenzo Cappellari & Anna De Paoli & Gilberto Turati, 2016. "Do Market Incentives for Hospitals Affect Health and Service Utilization? Evidence from PPS-DRG Tariffs in Italian Regions," CESifo Working Paper Series 5804, CESifo.
    7. Sina Akbari & Negar Kiyavash & AmirEmad Ghassami, 2025. "Semiparametric Triple Difference Estimators," Papers 2502.19788, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    8. Guangbo Ma & Kun Xu, 2022. "Value-Based Health Care: Long-Term Care Insurance for Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses and Self-Rated Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Wicaksana, Agus & Ho, William & Samson, Daniel & K. S. Lam, Hugo, 2025. "Tariff barriers and operational efficiency: the mitigative role of top management team supply chain management experience and potential domestic supply base," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Fang, Hanming & Liu, Chang, 2026. "Desired fertility, realized fertility and the effects of China's Universal Two-Child Policy∗," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Samuel Nocito & Marcello Sartarelli & Francesco Sobbrio, 2021. "A Beam of Light: Media, Tourism & Economic Development," CESifo Working Paper Series 9055, CESifo.
    12. Jing Li & Daniel M. Shapiro & Anastasia Ufimtseva & Peng Zhang, 2024. "Techno-nationalism and cross-border acquisitions in an age of geopolitical rivalry," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(9), pages 1190-1203, December.
    13. Gaynor, Martin & Laudicella, Mauro & Propper, Carol, 2012. "Can governments do it better? Merger mania and hospital outcomes in the English NHS," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 528-543.
    14. Tarduno, Matthew, 2025. "Elasticities and tax incidence in urban ridesharing markets: Evidence from Chicago," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Nocito, Samuel & Sartarelli, Marcello & Sobbrio, Francesco, 2023. "A beam of light: Media, tourism and economic development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina & Verzulli, Rossella, 2021. "Should I wait or should I go? Travelling versus waiting for better healthcare," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Huerta, Diego, 2026. "The regressive effects of worker protection: The role of financial constraints," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    19. Fang, Chao & Pan, Jiafeng & Wu, Peng, 2026. "Reaching the last mile: Digitalization of tax administration and VAT compliance at the retail stage," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Van Parys, Jessica & Brown, Zach Y., 2024. "Broadband Internet access and health outcomes: Patient and provider responses in Medicare," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:115097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.