IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/edn/esedps/321.html

OLS Estimation when Two Noisy Measures of a Regressor are Available: Instruments, Tests and Pitfalls

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Snell

    (School of Economics, University of Edinburgh)

Abstract

It is well known that if the regression coefficient of y on w (beta say) has a constant probability limit but we only have two noisy measures of w - x and z - then we may obtain consistent estimates of beta as long as a) the measurement errors are classical and b) the measurement errors are uncorrelated. We propose a simple test of a) and a test for b) as part of a composite null. To effect the latter we instrument x with z and functions of z and vice versa to obtain two sets of overidentifying restrictions tested via a standard J test of instrument validity. If no test in this sequence rejects we then combine the orthogonality conditions to obtain a single efficient estimate of beta. We discuss the likely prior validity of the various instruments and the pitfalls in using the test procedure. Unlike standard overidentification tests which diverge in heterogeneous response settings even when each instrument is valid, our tests only diverge when one or more instrument is invalid. We apply the test sequence and estimation procedure to analyse i) the cyclical component of wages and ii) the effect of state level unemployment on burglaries in the US. Correcting for measurement error raises the estimates of beta in both applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Snell, 2025. "OLS Estimation when Two Noisy Measures of a Regressor are Available: Instruments, Tests and Pitfalls," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 321, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
  • Handle: RePEc:edn:esedps:321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ed.ac.uk/papers/id321_esedps.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edn:esedps:321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deediuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.