IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/wc2000/1821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choice Set Definition Issues in a Kuhn-Tucker Model of Recreation Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Phaneuf

    (North Carolina State University)

Abstract

This line of research considers econometric methods for dealing with agent-level consumer choice data in the presence of binding non-negativity constraints. Specifically, the Kuhn-Tucker (KT) model and its dual counterpart (Wales and Woodland (1983), Lee and Pitt (1987), Phaneuf (1999), Phaneuf, et. al. (2000)) are applied to the problem of recreation site choice. The conceptual attractiveness of these methods is generally acknowledged, but the difficulty of estimation has prevented wide application. Extensions of these works to allow wider application are emphasized here. These include the use of more general functional forms and error structures, expanding the dimensions of models that can be estimated, improving the tractability and usability of these models, and providing additional applications. Good progress has been made in these areas. The paper included for consideration provides results for a 16 good complete demand system KT model applied to a fresh data set on the demand for visits to wetland recreation sites in Iowa. Recreation demand provides a good platform to study binding non-negativity constraints, since few individuals visit all recreation sites available to them and hence the data contain many zeros. The KT method recovers estimates of the utility function, from which utility consistent welfare measures resulting from changes in wetland characteristics and availability are calculated via Monte Carlo integration. A second paper is included for reference, providing more detail on the calculation and interpretation of welfare effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Phaneuf, 2000. "Choice Set Definition Issues in a Kuhn-Tucker Model of Recreation Demand," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1821, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/es2000/1821.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel J. Phaneuf & Catherine L. Kling & Joseph A. Herriges, 2000. "Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 82(1), pages 83-92, February.
    2. Bockstael, N E & McConnell, K E, 1993. "Public Goods as Characteristics of Non-market Commodities," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 103(420), pages 1244-1257, September.
    3. Wales, T. J. & Woodland, A. D., 1983. "Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 263-285, April.
    4. Bockstael, Nancy E & McConnell, Kenneth E, 1983. "Welfare Measurement in the Household Production Framework," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 806-814, September.
    5. Richard T. Carson, 2011. "Contingent Valuation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2489.
    6. Herriges, Joseph A. & Kling, Catherine L., 2003. "Recreation Demand Models," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10211, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongjie Ji & Joseph A. Herriges & Catherine L. Kling, 2016. "Modeling Recreation Demand When the Access Point Is Unknown," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(3), pages 860-880.
    2. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.